Ariz. Admin. Code § 7-2-1046

Current through Register Vol. 30, No. 50, December 13, 2024

Section R7-2-1046 - Evaluation of Proposals

A. Evaluation of proposals and best and final offers shall be based on the evaluation factors set forth in the request for proposals. Specific numerical weighting may be used.

1. If only one proposal is received in response to a request for proposals, the school district shall proceed according to R7-2-1032.

2. The school district shall not modify evaluation factors or the relative importance of price and other evaluation factors after the proposal due date and time.

3. A school district may appoint an evaluation committee to assist in the evaluation of proposals. If proposals are evaluated by an evaluation committee, the evaluation committee shall prepare an evaluation report for the school district. The school district may:

a. Accept the findings of the evaluation committee;

b. Request additional information from the evaluation committee; or

c. Reject the findings of the evaluation committee, in which case the school district shall appoint a new evaluation committee to evaluate the existing proposals or cancel the solicitation.

B. As part of its initial evaluation, the school district may contact an offeror to confirm the school district's understanding of the proposal. Such contact shall be prior to the determination that a proposal is acceptable for further consideration. The school district shall obtain written confirmation from the offeror and shall retain the confirmation in the procurement file.

C. The contract or contracts shall be awarded during the proposal acceptance period. If the proposal acceptance period expires prior to award of the contract or contracts, the procurement shall be canceled, unless the proposal acceptance period is extended in accordance with subsection (D).

D. To extend the proposal acceptance period, a school district shall notify all offerors in writing of an extension and request written concurrence from each offeror. To be eligible for a contract award, an offeror shall submit a written concurrence to the extension. The school district shall reject a proposal as nonresponsive if written concurrence is not provided as requested.

E. For the purpose of conducting discussions, the school district shall determine that proposals are either acceptable for further consideration or unacceptable.

F. A proposal is acceptable if it is determined to be reasonably susceptible of being awarded a contract in accordance with the evaluation criteria and a comparison and ranking of original proposals. Proposals to be considered reasonably susceptible of being awarded a contract shall, at a minimum, demonstrate the following:

1. Affirmative compliance with mandatory requirements designated in the solicitation.

2. An ability to deliver goods or services on terms advantageous to the school district sufficient to be entitled to continue in the competition.

3. That the proposal is technically acceptable as submitted.

G. A proposal is unacceptable if it is determined to not be reasonably susceptible of being awarded a contract. Those proposals that have no reasonable chance for award when compared on a relative basis with more highly ranked proposals will not be reasonably susceptible of being awarded a contract. The determination shall be in writing, state the basis for the determination and be retained in the procurement file. When there is doubt as to whether a proposal is reasonably susceptible of being awarded a contract, the proposal shall be considered acceptable.

H. If the school district determines an offeror's proposal is unacceptable, the school district shall notify that offeror of the determination and that the offeror shall not be afforded an opportunity to amend its proposal.

Ariz. Admin. Code § R7-2-1046

Adopted effective December 17, 1987 (Supp. 87-4). Amended by exempt rulemaking at 33 A.A.R. 1525, effective 7/1/2014.