Ariz. Admin. Code § 20-6-214

Current through Register Vol. 30, No. 45, November 8, 2024

Section R20-6-214 - Coordination of Benefits

A. Applicability.

1. This Section applies to all:

a. Group disability insurance policies;

b. Group subscriber contracts of hospital and medical service corporations and health care services organizations;

c. Group disability policies of benefit insurers; and

d. Group-type contracts that contain a coordination of benefits provision, are not available to the general public, and can be obtained and maintained only because of the covered person's membership in or connection with a particular organization. Group-type contracts that meet this description are included regardless of whether denominated as "franchise," "blanket," or some other designation.

2. This Section does not apply to:

a. Individual or family policies or individual or family subscriber contracts except as provided for in subsection (A)(1);

b. Group or group-type hospital indemnity benefits, written on a non-expense incurred basis, of $30 per day or less unless characterized as reimbursement-type benefits and designed or administered to give the insured the right to elect indemnity-type benefits, instead of the reimbursement type benefits at the time of claim; or

c. School accident type coverages, written on a blanket, group, or franchise basis.

B. Definitions. In this Section, the following definitions apply:

1. "Allowable expense" means any necessary, reasonable, and customary item of expense, at least a portion of which is covered under one or more of the plans covering the person for whom claim is made or service provided.

a. When a plan provides benefits in the form of services rather than cash payments, the reasonable cash value of each service rendered is deemed to be both an allowable expense and a benefit paid.

b. A plan that takes Medicare or similar government benefits into consideration when determining the application of its coordination of benefits provision does not expand the definition of an allowable expense.

2. "Claim determination period" means an appropriate period of time such as "calendar year" or "benefit period" as defined in the policy.

3. "Plan," within the coordination of benefits provisions of a group policy or subscriber contract, means the types of coverage that the insurer may consider in determining whether overinsurance exists with respect to a specific claim.

4. "School accident-type coverage" means coverage of grammar school and high school students for accidents only, including athletic injuries, either on a 24-hour basis or "to-and-from school," for which the parent pays the entire premium.

C. Order-of-benefit determination.

1. When a claim under a plan with a coordination of benefit provision involves another plan that also has a coordination of benefit provision, the insurer shall make the order-of-benefit determination as follows:

a. The plan that covers the person claiming benefits other than as a dependent shall determine benefits before those of the plan that covers the person as a dependent.

b. The plan of a parent whose birthday occurs earlier in a calendar year shall cover a dependent child before the benefits of a plan of a parent whose birthday occurs later in a calendar year. The word "birthday" as used in this subsection refers only to month and day in a calendar year, not the year in which the person was born.

c. If two or more plans cover a person as a dependent child of divorced or separated parents, benefits for the child are determined in the following order:

i. First, the plan of the parent with custody of the child;

ii. Then, the plan of the spouse of the parent with custody of the child; and

iii. Finally, the plan of the parent not having custody of the child.

d. Notwithstanding subsection (c), if the specific terms of a court decree state that one of the parents is responsible for the health care expenses of the child, and the entity obligated to pay or provide the benefits of the plan of that parent has actual knowledge of those terms, the benefits of that plan are determined first.

2. The benefits of a plan that covers a person as an employee (or as that employee's dependent) are determined before those of a plan that covers that person as a laid off or retired employee (or as that employee's dependent). If the other plan does not have this provision and if, as a result, the plans do not agree on the order of benefits, this subsection does apply.

3. If none of the provisions of subsection (C) determines the order of benefits, the benefits of the plan that covered a claimant longer are determined before those of the plan that covered that person for the shorter time.

4. If one of the plans is issued out of this state and determines the order of benefits based upon the gender of a parent and, as a result, the plans do not agree on the order of benefits, the plan with the gender rule shall determine the order of benefits.

D. Excess and other nonconforming provisions. A plan with an order of benefit determination provision that complies with this Section, a complying plan, may coordinate its benefits with a plan that is "excess" or "always secondary" or that uses an order-of-benefit determination provision that is inconsistent with this Section, a noncomplying plan, on the following basis:

1. If the complying plan is the primary plan, it shall pay or provide its benefits on a primary basis.

2. If the complying plan is the secondary plan, it shall pay or provide its benefits first, as the secondary plan. The payment shall be the limit of the complying plan's liability, except as provided in subsection (4).

3. If the noncomplying plan does not provide the information needed by the complying plan to determine its benefits within a reasonable time after it is requested to do so, the complying plan shall assume that the benefits of the noncomplying plan are identical to its own, and shall pay benefits accordingly. The complying plan shall adjust any payments it makes based on the assumption whether information becomes available as the actual benefits of the noncomplying plan.

4. If the noncomplying plan pays benefits so that the claimant receives less in benefits than the claimant would have received had the noncomplying plan paid or provided its benefits as the primary plan, the complying plan shall advance to or on behalf of the claimant an amount equal to the difference. The complying plan shall not have a right to reimbursement from the claimant.

Ariz. Admin. Code § R20-6-214

Adopted effective October 26, 1979 (Supp. 79-5). R20-6-214 recodified from R4-14-214 (Supp. 95-1). Section expired under A.R.S. § 41-1056(E) at 8 A.A.R. 491, effective September 30, 2001 (Supp. 02-1). Section R20-6-214 renumbered from R20-6-217 and amended by final rulemaking at 13 A.A.R. 2061, effective August 4, 2007 (Supp. 07-2).