Structure and Practices of the Video Relay Service Program

AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION:

Final rule.

SUMMARY:

In this document, the Commission adopts rules to address fraud, waste, and abuse in the Video Relay Service (VRS) industry. These rules are necessary to combat reported and detected activity that has resulted in inappropriate payments to VRS providers from the Interstate TRS Fund (Fund). The intended impact of these rules is to minimize fraud in order to safeguard the sustainability of the VRS program.

DATES:

Effective June 1, 2011, except § 64.604(b)(4)(iii) of the Commission's rules, which shall become effective August 30, 2011. The recordkeeping and reporting requirements contained herein are subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) and have not been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Written comments by the public on the new information collections are due July 1, 2011. The Commission will publish a document in the Federal Register announcing the effective date of these requirements.

ADDRESSES:

Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street, SW., Washington, DC 20554. In addition to filing comments with the Secretary, a copy of any comments on the information collection requirements contained herein should be submitted to Cathy Williams, Federal Communications Commission via e-mail at PRA@fcc.gov and Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Diane Mason, Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Disability Rights Office, at (202) 418-7126 or e-mail Diane.Mason@fcc.gov.

For additional information concerning the PRA information collection requirements contained in this document, contact Cathy Williams, Federal Communications Commission, at (202) 418-2918, or via e-mail Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

This is a synopsis of the Commission's Structure and Practices of the Video Relay Service Program, Report and Order (Report and Order), document FCC 11-54, adopted on April 5, 2011 and released on April 6, 2011, in CG Docket No. 10-51. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 10-88, adopted on May 24, 2010 and released on May 27, 2010 is published elsewhere in this issue. The full text of document FCC 11-54 and copies of any subsequently filed documents in this matter will be available for public inspection and copying via ECFS, and during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. They may also be purchased from the Commission's duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., Portals II, 445 12th Street, SW., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone: (800) 378-3160, fax: (202) 488-5563, or Internet: http://www.bcpiweb.com. Document FCC 11-54 can also be downloaded in Word or Portable Document Format (PDF) at: http://www.fcc.gov/cgb/dro/trs.html#orders. To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an e-mail to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530 (voice), 202-418-0432 (TTY).

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis

The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in document FCC 11-54 contains new and modified information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), Public Law 104-13. It will be submitted to OMB for review under section 3507(d) of the PRA. OMB, the general public, and other Federal agencies are invited to comment on the new or modified information collection requirements contained in this proceeding. In addition, the Commission notes that pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4), the Commission previously sought specific comment on how the Commission might further reduce the information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees.

In document FCC 11-54, the Commission has assessed the effects of imposing various requirements on VRS providers as well as providers of other forms of TRS. The Commission recognizes that these requirements are necessary to detect and prevent fraud, abuse and waste in the VRS program. The Commission takes these actions to ensure the sustainability of the program upon which individuals of hearing and speech disabilities have come to rely for their daily communication needs. In doing so, the Commission has balanced preserving the integrity of the VRS program and minimizing the information collection burden for small business concerns, including those with fewer than 25 employees. For example, in adopting procedures for the resolution of disputed provider payment claims when payment has been suspended, the Report and Order allows providers, including small businesses, to submit claims for payment in a process that is uniform, predictable and equitable for all providers, thereby reducing burdens associated with disputed payments. The Commission also requires automated recordkeeping of TRS minutes submitted to the Fund. The Commission believes that providers automatically receiving records of TRS minutes and submitting them in an electronic format should entail minimal burden and will prove critical to ensuring that submitted data for compensation is accurate. The Commission also finds that requiring providers to provide reports and retain records in an electronic format that is retrievable will provide a seamless transaction for the purpose of compensation from the TRS Fund, which will alleviate burdens on providers, including small businesses. Further, the Commission believes that the whistleblower protection rule adopted in the Report and Order will benefit all providers, including small businesses, because it provides their employees with guidance that will reduce uncertainty associated with employee's rights. Finally, the Commission concludes that all TRS providers, including small entities, will be eligible to receive compensation from the Interstate TRS Fund for their reasonable costs of complying with the requirements adopted in the Report and Order. These measures should substantially alleviate any burdens on businesses with fewer than 25 employees.

Congressional Review Act

The Commission will send a copy of document FCC 11-54 in a report to be sent to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).

Synopsis

1. In document FCC 11-54, the Commission adopts rules to detect and prevent fraud and abuse in the provision of video relay service (VRS), which allows users to communicate in sign language via a video link. The Commission recognizes the valuable ways in which VRS fulfills the communication needs of persons who are deaf and hard of hearing. The program's structure, however, has made it vulnerable to fraud and abuse, which have plagued the current program and threatened its long-term sustainability.

In November 2009, the U.S. Department of Justice indicted 26 people for allegedly manufacturing and billing the Fund for illegitimate calls, the vast majority of whom have either pleaded guilty or been convicted. The Commission continues to receive numerous allegations of abusive practices by VRS providers. Some of these allegations have resulted in criminal investigations of VRS practices, which in turn have been the subject of semi-annual reports that the Commission's Office of the Inspector General (OIG) has submitted to Congress. The reports on these investigations have noted evidence of the following illicit VRS activities:

• Callers specifically requesting that the call not be relayed by the communications assistant (CA) to a third party;
• Calls placed to numbers that do not require any relaying, for example a voice-to-voice call;
• Calls initiated from international IP addresses by callers with little or no fluency in ASL where the connection is permitted to “run” (i.e., the line is simply left open without any relaying of the call occurring);
• Implementation of “double privacy screens” (i.e., where both users to the video leg of the call block their respective video displays, thus making communication impossible);
• VRS CAs calling themselves;
• CAs connecting videophones/computers and letting them run with no parties participating in the call;
• Callers disconnecting from one illegitimate call and immediately calling back to initiate another; and
• Callers admitting that they were paid to make TRS calls.

2. Document FCC 11-54 follows the Commission's, Structure and Practices of Video Relay Service, Declaratory Ruling, Order and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (VRS Call Practices NPRM), document FCC 10-88, published at 75 FR 51735, August 23, 2010. In the VRS Call Practices NRPM, the Commission sought comment on a number of ways to reduce and ultimately eliminate fraud and abuse, and to improve the integrity and sustainability of the TRS Fund that pays for this program. Specifically, the Commission sought comment on: (1) The location of VRS call centers; (2) VRS CAs working from home; (3) compensation for VRS CAs; (4) procedures for the suspension of payment from the TRS Fund; (5) the permissibility of specific call practices; and (6) ways to detect and stop the billing of illegitimate calls.

Location of VRS Call Centers

3. The Commission declines to adopt its tentative conclusion to require that all VRS call centers be located in the United States. The Commission is concerned about potential violations of international trade agreements, and also agrees with those commenters that argue that it can effectively control fraud and ensure compliance with the Commission's mandatory minimum standards at any center, regardless of its location, in other ways. However, it will assist the Commission's investigatory efforts to have information about where all current and future call centers are located. Accordingly, the Commission amends its rules to require all VRS providers to submit a written statement to the Commission and the TRS Fund administrator containing the locations of all of their call centers that handle VRS calls, including call centers located outside the United States, twice a year, on April 1st and October 1st. In addition to the street address of each call center, the Commission further directs that these statements contain (1) the number of individual CAs and CA managers employed at each call center; and (2) the name and contact information (phone number and e-mail address) for the managers at each call center. The Commission also amends its rules to require VRS providers to notify the Commission and the TRS Fund administrator in writing at least 30 days prior to any change to their call centers' locations, including the opening, closing, or relocation of any center.

VRS CAs Working From Their Homes

4. Allowing VRS CAs to work from their homes poses substantially more risks than benefits. An unsupervised home environment is more conducive to fraud than a supervised call center with on-site management. In the course of the Commission's ongoing investigations of fraud in the VRS industry, the Commission has identified numerous incidents in which unsupervised VRS CAs may have been complicit in facilitating fraudulent calls.

5. The Commission is also concerned about the ability of home-based VRS arrangements, where there is no on-site management to provide direct supervision, to achieve full compliance with the Commission's TRS mandatory minimum standards. First, the Commission is not convinced that call handling in a home environment can meet the Commission's TRS standard requiring strict confidentiality of all relay calls. See 47 CFR 64.604(a)(2) of the Commission's rules. Eavesdropping is more likely to occur in a home environment and provider call centers typically ensure structural or other arrangements that prevent sound from carrying from call station to call station, which are not available in a home. Second, the Commission is concerned about potential violations of the Commission's technical standards in a home environment. Commission rules require TRS facilities to have redundancy features, including uninterruptible power for emergency use, and further require TRS providers to be able to handle all 9-1-1 calls. See 47 CFR 64.604(b)(4)(ii) and 64.605 of the Commission's rules. The record does not contain evidence that these critical capabilities, routinely available in provider-operated call centers, are equally available in all home environments.

6. Finally, the Commission has concerns about the ability to achieve service quality standards in a home environment. For example, in provider-based call centers, managerial staff can intervene in the event that a CA is having difficulty understanding someone's signs, assist with an emergency call to 9-1-1, or relieve a CA in the middle of a call if the CA suddenly becomes ill. That is not the case in a home-based setting. Moreover, in a home environment, even when the CA's door is locked and surveillance cameras are used, there is little assurance that interruptions will not occur or that noises coming from outside the room, for example, from other family members, will not adversely affect the CA's ability to accurately and effectively interpret the call. Given the use of VRS as a critical tool for communication in employment and other daily life activities, as well as the statutory mandate to ensure functionally equivalent communication services, the Commission has an obligation to do all that it can to ensure that relay service enables communication that is as accurate and reliable as that of a direct voice telephone conversation. If the Commission determines in the future that home-based VRS can be provided in a manner that meets all of the Commission's requirements, the Commission may revisit this finding.

VRS CA Compensation

7. The indictments resulting from criminal investigations into VRS fraud are replete with alleged instances in which CAs were rewarded for handling calls that otherwise would not have been made, as well as alleged schemes directing VRS call center employees to make illegitimate calls. In addition to being criminal, these arrangements do not support the goal of TRS, which is to provide a telephone service equivalent that allows people with hearing and/or speech disabilities to make or receive calls only when they want to do so. While it may be legitimate to reward VRS employees with bonuses and other forms of compensation for a job well done, or for extra hours worked, incentives based on the number of minutes or calls that these employees handle encourage such employees to generate minutes that would not otherwise have been made by individuals using VRS. Such incentives encourage CAs to process additional traffic, artificially lengthen the time of a call, or even engage in illicit schemes to create fictional calls where no relaying takes place. Such incentives may be the cause of a substantial amount of the fraud that has occurred over the past few years. Accordingly, the Commission now concludes that VRS CAs, either individually or as part of a group, are prohibited from receiving compensation, being given preferential work schedules, or otherwise benefiting in any way based on the number of minutes or calls that they relay.

Procedures for the Suspension of Payment

8. Delay or suspension of payment is expressly authorized by the TRS rules, which state that the Fund administrator “may suspend or delay payments to a TRS provider if the TRS provider fails to provide adequate verification of payment upon reasonable request, or if directed by the Commission to do so.” 47 CFR 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(E) of the Commission's rules. In the past, payment has been withheld either because the minutes have appeared to be non-compensable under the Commission's rules or because the Commission has a basis for believing that fraud is associated with the minutes. To preserve the integrity of the TRS Fund, the Commission must continue withholding payments for TRS minutes, where justified, to ensure compliance with the Commission's rules and to prevent fraud and abuse of the TRS program.

9. However, to provide greater due process and transparency to TRS providers, the Commission adopts a one-year time frame (starting with the date of the provider's initial request for payment) for the evaluation and resolution of disputed payment claims. The time frames set forth below relate only to payment suspension or delay and not to the Commission's investigatory processes used to determine whether a provider has violated the Act or any Commission rule or order. The procedures and time frames for investigation and enforcement will continue to be governed by the provisions of the Act relevant to the Commission's investigative and enforcement functions. The time frames discussed below also are not intended to affect the investigatory processes of other law enforcement bodies, such as the U.S. Department of Justice, in determining whether a provider has violated any provision of law that such other law enforcement entity enforces. The Commission amends its rules by adopting the following process for suspension or delay of payment to a TRS provider:

• The Fund administrator will continue the current practice of reviewing monthly requests for compensation of TRS minutes of use within two months after they are filed with the Fund administrator.
• If the Fund administrator in consultation with the Commission, or the Commission on its own accord, determines that payments for certain minutes should be withheld, the TRS provider will be notified within two months from the date the request for compensation was filed, as to why its claim for compensation has been withheld in whole or in part. The TRS provider then will be given two additional months from the date of notification to provide additional justification for payment of such minutes of use. Such justification should be sufficiently detailed to provide the Fund administrator and the Commission the information needed to evaluate whether the minutes of use in dispute are compensable. If the TRS provider does not respond, or does not respond with sufficiently detailed information within two months after notification that payment for minutes of use is being withheld, payment for the minutes of use in dispute will be denied permanently.
• If the TRS provider submits additional justification for payment of the minutes of use in dispute within two months after being notified that its initial justification was insufficient, the Fund administrator or the Commission will review such additional justification documentation, and may ask further questions or conduct further investigation to evaluate whether to pay the TRS provider for the minutes of use in dispute, within eight months after submission of such additional justification.
• If the provider meets its burden to establish that the minutes in question are compensable under the Commission's rules, the Fund administrator will compensate the provider for such minutes of use. Any payment from the Fund will not preclude any future action by either the Commission or the U.S. Department of Justice to recover past payments (regardless of whether the payment was the subject of withholding) if it is determined at any time that such payment was for minutes billed to the Commission in violation of the Commission's rules or any other civil or criminal law.
• If the Commission determines that the provider has not met its burden to demonstrate that the minutes of use in dispute are compensable under the Commission's rules, payment will be permanently denied. The Fund administrator or the Commission will notify the provider of this decision within one year of the initial request for payment.

International VRS Calls

10. In recent years, the TRS Fund call data has revealed a large number of VRS calls from international IP addresses (i.e., wherein the originating party's IP address indicates that the call originated from outside of the United States). In its 2009 Semi-Annual Report to Congress, the Commission's OIG noted that some of the allegations of conspiracy, fraud, and other criminal activity that have been associated with VRS minutes billed to the TRS Fund were based, among other things, on evidence of “run” calls initiated by callers with little or no fluency in ASL from international IP addresses in which no conversations were relayed. Because many of these minutes are likely attributable to fraudulent or abusive activities, the Commission adopts rules to prohibit compensation for VRS calls that originate with Internet connections from international IP addresses, regardless of where those calls terminate. The Commission adopts a limited exception to this prohibition for VRS calls originating from international IP addresses that are made by a U.S. resident who has pre-registered with his or her default provider prior to leaving the country, so long as the provider has an accurate means of verifying the identity of such callers and their locations at the time such calls are made. When pre-registering, such individuals must specify the locations to which the individual will be traveling, as well as a finite period of time during which they will be on travel. Only calls made from those locations and during the specified time period will be compensable if otherwise in compliance with the Commission's rules and not associated with fraudulent activities. The general prohibition against Internet calling does not apply to (1) VRS calls initiated by voice callers located outside the United States to deaf users physically located in the United States or (2) legitimate VRS calls originated by individuals with IP addresses associated with registered ten-digit numbers that are made from a location within the United States and terminating outside the United States.

A. Use of Privacy Screens; Idle Calls

11. In recent years, some VRS providers have participated in practices that effectively “suspend” the communication that is supposed to be taking place between the parties to a relay call for what appears to be excessive amounts of time. The Commission adopts two rules to reduce the frequency of these schemes. First, the Commission adopts a rule prohibiting CAs from enabling privacy screens from their side of the call at any time. There is no justification for a CA to ever prevent a caller from seeing him or her, because the precise and sole function of the CA is to interpret the call using sign language, a visual language.

12. Second, the Commission adopts a rule requiring CAs to terminate VRS calls if either or both the calling or called party: (1) Enables a privacy screen for more than five minutes; or (2) is completely unresponsive or unengaged (creating an idle call) for longer than five minutes. Prior to disconnecting a call, a CA must first announce to both parties the intent to terminate the call and may reverse the decision to disconnect if one of the parties indicates that he or she is still actively participating on the call. This rule will not apply to 9-1-1 calls. Nor will it apply to relay calls that are legitimately placed on hold (e.g., by a customer service agent), where at least one of the parties to the call is still actively present and waiting for the other party to return to the phone. To avoid any ambiguity as to the ongoing nature of the call, the Commission expects that at least one of the parties to the call will check in with the CA periodically, so that the CA knows the call has not ended or become idle.

B. Provider-Involved Remote Training

13. The function of a VRS provider is to provide communication for people with hearing and/or speech disabilities that is functionally equivalent to voice telephone communications. When a VRS provider engages in activities that are designed to attract VRS users to “remote training sessions,” it is highly likely that the provider is doing so for the sole purpose of generating minutes. The Commission defines remote training to include any training session, such as a classroom lesson, tutorial lesson, seminar, speaker's conference or other event to which an individual connects from a remote distance via a telephone or Internet-based connection. In the VRS Call Practices NPRM, the Commission noted that as many as 232,000 VRS minutes stemmed from these and similar types of remote training sessions in the second half of 2009, resulting in at least $1.4 million billed to the Fund. Accordingly, the Commission adopts a rule that where a provider is involved, in any way, in remote training, VRS calls to such training sessions are not reimbursable from the Fund. Non-compensable arrangements shall include any program or activity in which a provider or its affiliates of any kind, including, but not limited to, its subcontractors, partnerships, employees and sponsoring organizations or entities, have any role in arranging, scheduling, sponsoring, hosting, conducting or promoting such programs or activities to VRS users.

C. Ineligible Providers; Revenue Sharing Schemes

14. In order to reduce fraud and establish better oversight of the VRS program, and address the unauthorized revenue sharing arrangements that have escalated in the VRS program, the Commission amends its rules in the following ways. First, only entities determined to be eligible to receive compensation from the TRS Fund under § 64.604(c)(5)(iii)(F) of the Commission's rules will be eligible to provide VRS and hold themselves out as providers of VRS to the general public. VRS service must be offered under the name by which the provider became certified and in a manner that clearly identifies that provider of the service. The foregoing requirement will not prevent a VRS provider from utilizing sub-brands, such as those dedicated to particular states, communities or regions in which it provides service, but requires that each sub-brand clearly identify the certified entity as the actual provider of the service. Calls to any brand or sub-brand of VRS must be routed through a single URL for that brand or sub-brand.

15. Second, the Commission amends its rules to make clear that an eligible provider is prohibited from engaging any third party entity to provide VRS CAs or call center functions (including call distribution, routing, call setup, mapping, call features, billing for compensation from the TRS Fund, and registration), on its behalf, unless that third party entity also is an eligible provider under the Commission's rules. This provision will ensure that an eligible provider is responsible for providing the core components of VRS, rather than subcontracting out these responsibilities to third party entities, whose operations are not under the direct supervision of the Commission.

16. Third, to the extent an eligible provider contracts with a third party to provide any other services or functions related to the provision of VRS, at third party entity must not hold itself out to the public as a VRS provider. This will make it easier for consumers, the Commission and the Fund administrator to tie service to the company providing that service.

17. Fourth, to provide effective oversight, all third-party contracts or agreements must be executed in writing and copies of these agreements must be available to the Commission and the TRS Fund administrator upon request. Such contracts or agreements shall provide detailed information about the nature of the services to be provided by the subcontractor.

18. Lastly, the Commission seeks to reduce the risk that marketing and outreach efforts will continue to be vehicles for manufacturing fraudulent minutes, such as those described above. To the extent an eligible VRS provider contracts with a third party to provide any services or functions related to marketing or outreach, and such services utilize VRS, the costs for such services cannot be compensated from the TRS Fund on a per-minute basis. In addition, all agreements in connection with marketing and outreach activities, including those involving sponsorships, financial endorsements, awards, and gifts made by the provider to any individual or entity, must be described in the providers' annual submissions to the TRS Fund administrator.

D. Whistleblower Protections

19. The Commission adopts specific whistleblower protections for the employees and contractors of TRS providers. Notwithstanding the existence of other Federal and state whistleblower regulations, establishing a specific TRS whistleblower protection rule here will provide an explicit layer of protection for employees who are interested in disclosing information necessary to combat waste, fraud, and abuse with respect to relay services, and thus encourage them to do so. Current or former employees of TRS providers or any contractors (“covered individuals”) will be protected from reprisal in the form of a personnel action if they disclose information they reasonably believe evidences a violation of the Act or TRS regulations (including any activities that could result in the improper billing of minutes to the TRS Fund) to the eligible TRS provider billing for those minutes, the Commission, the Interstate TRS Fund administrator, or any Federal or state law enforcement entity. For a disclosure to be protected, the covered individual must have a reasonable belief that the information is true. The actual veracity of any disclosure, however, will not affect whether a disclosure is protected. If a TRS provider violates the TRS whistleblower protection rule, as with any rule violation, the Commission may take enforcement action.

20. Providers shall provide information about these TRS whistleblower protections, including the right to notify the Commission's OIG or its Enforcement Bureau, to all employees and contractors, in writing. Providers that already disseminate their internal business policies to their employees in writing (e.g. in employee handbooks, policies and procedures manuals, or bulletin board postings) must also explicitly include these TRS whistleblower protections in those written materials. The Commission will also take steps to disseminate information about the TRS whistleblower protection rule.

21. Unlike interpreters generally, CAs are strictly bound by the standards set forth in the Commission's regulations. Thus, whatever ethical codes may be imposed upon these individuals by their certifying bodies in community interpreting situations do not necessarily govern VRS situations; rather the specific rules, including those dealing with confidentiality, that are contained in the Commission's mandatory minimum standards are the governing standards for CAs who handle VRS calls.

Data, Audits and Record Retention Requirements

Data Filed With the Fund Administrator to Support Payment Claims

22. The Commission now expands the data collection rules to require the filing of the following data associated with each VRS call for which a VRS provider seeks compensation: (1) The call record ID sequence; (2) CA ID number; (3) session start and end times; (4) conversation start and end times; (5) incoming telephone number and IP address (if call originates with an IP-based device) at the time of call; (6) outbound telephone number and IP address (if call terminates with an IP-based device) at the time of call; (7) total conversation minutes; (8) total session minutes; (9) the call center (by assigned center ID number) that handles the call; and (10) the URL address through which the call was initiated.

23. The Commission also amends its functional TRS mandatory minimum standards to require VRS and IP Relay providers to submit speed of answer compliance data. Under the Commission's rules, VRS providers are required to answer 80 percent of all calls within 120 seconds. 47 CFR 64.604(b)(2)(iii) of the Commission's rules. The provision of this data will enable the Commission to ensure compliance with this mandatory minimum standard, which is critical to ensuring that VRS providers promptly answer calls.

24. Finally, in the VRS Call Practices NPRM, the Commission amends its rules to require that the call record and speed of answer data be submitted electronically and in a standardized format in order to reduce the burden associated with compiling and filing this data and to facilitate the collection and analysis of this data by the Fund administrator and the Commission.

Automated Call Data Collection

25. The Commission amends its rules to require TRS providers to use an automated record keeping system to capture the following data when seeking compensation from the Fund: (1) The call record ID sequence; (2) CA ID number; (3) session start and end times, at a minimum to the nearest second; (4) conversation start and end times, at a minimum to the nearest second; (5) incoming telephone number (if call originates with a telephone) and IP address (if call originates with an IP-based device) at the time of the call; (6) outbound telephone number and IP address (if call terminates to an IP-based device) at the time of call; (7) total conversation minutes; (8) total session minutes; and (9) the call center (by assigned center ID number) that handles the call. The Commission defines automated recordkeeping system for purposes of these rules as a system that captures data in a computerized and electronic format in a manner that does not allow human intervention during the call session (for either conversation or session time). An electronic system that requires the CA or provider's employee to manually press a start and/or end command key in order to capture the required data or to terminate the data recording does not constitute an automated system under this requirement.

Transparency and the Disclosure of Provider Financial and Call Data

26. The Commission has declined to make individual provider cost data available to the public because of its highly proprietary nature, and in light of the significant fraud and abuse that has taken place in this industry. The Commission must consider cost and demand data as part of the VRS compensation rate-setting process, and it will work in conjunction with the Fund administrator to carefully scrutinize data submitted by providers.

Provider Audits

27. The Commission has determined that regular audits of providers must be conducted to ensure the integrity of the TRS Fund. In order to provide the Commission the flexibility and discretion it needs in determining when audits are necessary, the Commission amends the TRS mandatory minimum standards to require that all TRS providers submit to audits annually or, if necessary, at any other time deemed appropriate by the Commission, the Fund administrator, or by the Commission's OIG. The Commission also concludes that providers that fail to fully cooperate in audits, for example, by failing to provide documentation necessary for verification upon reasonable request, will be subject to an automatic suspension of TRS payments until sufficient documentation is provided. The Commission believes that this policy will promote greater transparency and accountability in the compensation process.

Record Retention

28. Providers of all forms of Internet-based TRS must retain all required call detail records, other records that support their claims for payment from the Fund, and records used to substantiate the costs and expense data submitted in the annual relay service data request form for a minimum of five years, in an electronic format that is easily retrievable for the Commission and TRS Fund administrator for possible future use, including audits. Retained records must include the following data that is used to support payment claims submitted to the Fund administrator: (1) The call record ID sequence; (2) CA ID number; (3) session start and end times; (4) conversation start and end times; (5) incoming telephone number and IP address (if call originates with an IP-based device) at the time of call; (6) outbound telephone number and IP address (if call terminates with an IP-based device) at the time of call; (7) total conversation minutes; (8) total session minutes; and (9) the call center (by assigned center ID number) that handles the call.

Provider Certification Under Penalty of Perjury

29. The Commission permanently adopts the rule requiring the CEO, CFO, or other senior executive of a TRS provider with first hand knowledge of the accuracy and completeness of the information provided, to certify, under penalty of perjury that: (1) Minutes submitted to the Fund administrator for compensation were handled in compliance with section 225 of the Act and the Commission's rules and orders, and are not the result of impermissible financial incentives, payments or kickbacks to generate calls, and (2) cost and demand data submitted to the Fund administrator in connection with the determination of compensation rates or methodologies are true and correct, as follows:

I swear under penalty of perjury that (i) I am __(name and title), __an officer of the above-named reporting entity and that I have examined the foregoing reports and that all requested information has been provided and all statements of fact, as well as all cost and demand data contained in this Relay Services Data Request, are true and accurate; and (ii) the TRS calls for which compensation is sought were handled in compliance with section 225 of the Communications Act and the Commission's rules and orders, and are not the result of impermissible financial incentives or payments to generate calls.

30. The Commission believes that this certification will provide an added deterrent against fraud and abuse of the Fund by making senior officers of providers more accountable for the compensation data submitted to the Fund administrator.

Final Regulatory Flexibility Certification

31. The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended (RFA), requires that a regulatory flexibility analysis be prepared for rulemaking proceedings, unless the agency certifies that “the rule will not, if promulgated, have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.” See 5 U.S.C. 603. The RFA, see 5 U.S.C. 601-612, has been amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, (SBREFA) Public Law 104-121, Title II, 110 Stat. 857 (1996). The RFA generally defines “small entity” as having the same meaning as the terms “small business,” “small organization,” and “small governmental jurisdiction.” In addition, the term “small business” has the same meaning as the term “small business concern” under the Small Business Act. A small business concern is one which: (1) Is independently owned and operated; (2) is not dominant in its field of operation; and (3) satisfies any additional criteria established by the Small Business Administration (SBA).

32. The Report and Order adopts rules to minimize fraud, waste, and abuse in the TRS industry, particularly for VRS. Specifically, the Report and Order takes the following measures: It adopts rules requiring that VRS providers submit a statement describing the location and staffing of their call centers twice a year, and a notification at least 30 days prior to any change in the location of such centers. It prohibits VRS CAs from relaying calls from their homes. It prohibits VRS provider arrangements that involve tying compensation paid or other benefits given to CAs to minutes or calls processed by that CA, either individually or as part of a group. In addition, the Commission adopts procedures for the resolution of disputed provider payment claims when payment has been suspended.

33. In addition to the above, in the Report and Order, the Commission adopts a rule prohibiting compensation for VRS calls that originate from IP addresses that indicate the individual initiating the call is located outside of the United States. Under new rules, VRS CAs will be required to terminate a VRS call if either party to the call: (1) Enables a privacy screen or similar feature for more than five minutes, or (2) is unresponsive or unengaged for more than five minutes, unless the call is to 9-1-1 or one of the parties is on hold. In addition, compensation for VRS calls for remote training when the provider is involved in any way with such training will be prohibited. The Report and Order also requires automated recordkeeping of TRS minutes submitted to the Fund, and amends the rules governing data collection from VRS providers to add requirements for the filing of data associated with each VRS call for which a VRS provider is seeking compensation.

34. The Report and Order prohibits revenue sharing agreements between entities eligible for compensation from the Fund and non-eligible entities. Providers will be prohibited from engaging third party entities to provide CAs or call center functions unless the third party is also an eligible provider. Where providers contract with or otherwise authorize other entities to provide other services or functions related to the provision of VRS, the third party may not hold itself out to the public as a service provider. Any such third party contracts must be in writing and available to the Commission and Fund administrator upon request. In addition, each VRS provider will be required to offer VRS only under the name by which the provider became certified and in a manner that clearly identifies that provider of the service, or a sub-brand name that identifies that provider. All calls to any brand or sub-brand of TRS must be routed through a single URL for that brand or sub-brand.

35. The Commission adopts whistleblower protection rules for current and former employees and contractors of TRS providers. The Commission also will require that VRS providers submit to audits annually or as deemed appropriate by the Fund administrator or the Commission. Internet-based TRS providers will be required to retain all records that support their claims for payment from the Fund for five years. Finally, the Commission makes permanent the emergency rule that requires the CEO, CFO, or another senior executive of a TRS provider with first-hand knowledge of the accuracy and completeness of the information to certify, under penalty of perjury, to the validity of minutes and data submitted to the Fund administrator.

36. In order to be compensated, TRS providers are required to comply with all of the Commission's rules governing the provision of TRS. All reasonable costs of providing service in compliance with the Report and Order are compensable from the Fund. Thus, because the providers will recoup the costs of compliance within a reasonable period, the Commission asserts that the providers will not be detrimentally burdened.

37. Therefore, the Commission certifies that the requirements of the Report and Order will not have a significant adverse economic impact on any entities, large or small.

38. The Commission has previously limited its RFA considerations to those entities collecting money directly from the TRS Fund. Although there may be various impacted entities that subcontract with providers eligible for direct compensation from the TRS Fund, the Commission does not have oversight of such entities.

39. Therefore, in addressing only those entities currently eligible to receive compensation from the TRS Fund, the Commission also notes that, of the fourteen providers affected by the Report and Order, no more than five meet the definition of a small entity. The SBA has developed a small business size standard for Wired Telecommunications Carriers, which consists of all such firms having 1,500 or fewer employees.

40. Currently, fourteen providers receive compensation from the Interstate TRS Fund for providing any form of TRS. Because no more than five of the providers that will be affected by the Report and Order, if adopted, are deemed to be small entities under the SBA's small business size standard, the Commission concludes that the number of small entities potentially affected by our proposed rules is not substantial. In addition, because those providers that meet the definition of small entity will be promptly compensated within a reasonable period for complying with the Report and Order, the Commission concludes that the financial impact of the Commission's decisions in the Report and Order is not substantial.

41. Therefore, for all of the reasons stated above, the Commission certifies that the requirements of the Report and Order will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, or any entities.

42. The Commission will send a copy of the Report and Order, including a copy of the Final Regulatory Flexibility Certification, in a report to Congress pursuant to the Congressional Review Act. In addition, the Report and Order and the final certification will be sent to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the SBA.

Ordering Clauses

43. Pursuant to sections 1, 4(i), (j) and (o), 225, and 303(r), of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 151, 154(i), (j) and (o), 225, and 303(r), document FCC 11-54 is adopted.

44. Pursuant to § 1.427(a) of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.427(a), document FCC 11-54 and the rules adopted herein shall become effective June 1, 2011, except for rule, 64.604(b)(4)(iii), which shall become effective August 30, 2011, and except for the rules containing information collections, which require approval by OMB under the PRA and which shall become effective after the Commission publishes a notice in the Federal Register announcing such approval and the relevant effective date.

45. The Commission's Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau, Reference Information Center, shall send a copy of the Report and Order, including the Final Regulatory Flexibility Certification, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.

List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 64

• Individuals with disabilities
• Reporting and recordkeeping requirements
• Telecommunications
• Telephone

Final Rules

For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission amends 47 CFR part 64 as follows:

PART 64—MISCELLANEOUS RULES RELATING TO COMMON CARRIERS

1. The authority citation for part 64 is revised to read as follows:

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 254(k); secs. 403(b)(2)(B), (c), Pub. L. 104-104, 110 Stat. 56. Interpret or apply 47 U.S.C. 201, 218, 222, 225, 226, 228, 254(k), and 620, unless otherwise noted.

Subpart F—Telecomunications Relay Services and Related Customer Premises Equipment for Persons with Disabilities

2. The authority citation for Subpart F is revised to read as follows:

Authority: 47 U.S.C. 151-154; 225, 255, 303(r), and 620.

3. In 64.601, redesignate paragraph (a)(27) as paragraph (a)(28), and add a new paragraph (a)(27) to read as follows:

4. Section 64.604 is revised by adding new paragraphs (a)(6), (a)(7), and (b)(4)(iii), by revising paragraph (c)(5)(iii)(C), and by adding new paragraphs (c)(5)(iii)(L), (c)(5)(iii)(M), and (c)(5)(iii)(N) to read as follows:

5. In § 64.606, revise paragraph (g) to read as follows: