On March 23, 2012, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“Exchange” or “NASDAQ”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“Commission”), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act”) and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, a proposed rule change to establish the Market Quality Program. On March 29, 2012, the Exchange submitted Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change. The proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1 thereto, was published for comment in the Federal Register on April 12, 2012. The Commission initially received fifteen comment letters on the proposed rule change. On May 18, 2012, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, the Commission extended the time period for Commission action on the proposed rule change to July 11, 2012. The Commission subsequently received three additional comment letters on the proposed rule change and a response letter from the Exchange. On July 11, 2012, the Commission instituted proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1. The Commission thereafter received six comment letters and two response letters from the Exchange.
17 CFR 240.19b-4.
In Amendment No. 1, NASDAQ made a technical amendment to Item I of Exhibit 1 to delete an erroneous reference to the NASDAQ Options Market and replace it with a reference to NASDAQ.
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66765 (April 6, 2012), 77 FR 22042.
See Letter from Frank Choi, dated April 13, 2012; Letter from Christopher J. Csicsko, dated April 14, 2012; Letter from Jeremiah O'Connor III, dated April 14, 2012; Letter from Dezso J. Szalay, dated April 15, 2012; Letter from Kathryn Keita, dated April 18, 2012; Letter; Letter from Anonymous, dated April 18, 2012; Letter from Mark Connell, dated April 19, 2012; Letter from Timothy Quast, Managing Director, Modern Networks IR LLC, dated April 26, 2012; Letter from Daniel G. Weaver, Ph.D., Professor of Finance, Rutgers Business School, dated April 26, 2012; Letter from Amber Anand, Associate Professor of Finance, Syracuse University, dated April 29, 2012; Letter from Albert J. Menkveld, Associate Professor of Finance, VU University Amsterdam, dated May 2, 2012; Letter from James J. Angel, Associate Professor of Finance, Georgetown University, dated May 2, 2012; Letter from Ari Burstein, Senior Counsel, Investment Company Institute, dated May 3, 2012; Letter from Gus Sauter, Managing Director and Chief Investment Officer, Vanguard, dated May 3, 2012; and Letter from Leonard J. Amoruso, General Counsel, Knight Capital Group, Inc., dated May 4, 2012.
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67022 (May 18, 2012), 77 FR 31050 (May 24, 2012).
See Letter from Gary L. Gastineau, Managing Member, ETF Consultants LLC, dated June 11, 2012; Letter from Rey Ramsey, President & CEO, TechNet, dated June 20, 2012; and Letter from Stuart J. Kaswell, Executive Vice President & Managing Director, General Counsel, Managed Funds Association, dated July 3, 2012. See Letter from Joan C. Conley, Senior Vice President & Corporate Secretary, NASDAQ, dated July 6, 2012.
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67411, 77 FR 42052 (July 17, 2012).
See Letter from Joseph Cavatoni, Managing Director, and Joanne Medero, Managing Director, BlackRock, Inc., dated July 11, 2012; Letter from Stanislav Dolgopolov, Assistant Adjunct Professor, UCLA School of Law, dated August 15, 2012; Letter from James E. Ross, Global Head, SPDR Exchange Traded Funds, State Street Global Advisors, dated August 16, 2012; Letter from Ari Burstein, Senior Counsel, Investment Company Institute, dated August 16, 2012; Letter from F. William McNabb, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Vanguard, dated August 16, 2012; and Letter from Andrew Stevens, Legal Counsel, IMC Chicago, LLC d/b/a IMC Financial Markets, dated August 16, 2012. See Letters from Joan C. Conley, Senior Vice President & Corporate Secretary, NASDAQ OMX LLC, dated August 30, 2012 and Jurij Trypupenko, Esq., NASDAQ, dated September 7, 2012.
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act provides that, after initiating disapproval proceedings, the Commission shall issue an order approving or disapproving the proposed rule change not later than 180 days after the date of publication of notice of filing of the proposed rule change. The Commission may extend the period for issuing an order approving or disapproving the proposed rule change, however, by not more than 60 days if the Commission determines that a longer period is appropriate and publishes the reasons for such determination. The proposed rule change was published for notice and comment in the Federal Register on April 12, 2012. October 9, 2012 is 180 days from that date, and December 8, 2012 is 240 days from that date.
The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period within which to issue an order approving or disapproving the proposed rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider this proposed rule change, the issues raised in the comment letters that have been submitted in response to the proposed rule change, including comment letters submitted in response to the Order Instituting Proceedings, and the Exchange's responses to such comments.
Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act, designates December 8, 2012 as the date by which the Commission should either approve or disapprove the proposed rule change (File Number SR-NASDAQ-2012-043).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.13
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-24733 Filed 10-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P