Financial Assistance and Social Services Programs

AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION:

Final rule.

SUMMARY:

The Bureau of Indian Affairs (Bureau) is amending the existing Financial Assistance and Social Services Program regulations to incorporate rules for Adult Care Assistance, Burial Assistance, Child Assistance, Disaster Assistance, Emergency Assistance, General Assistance, Services to Children, Elderly and Families, Tribal Welfare Reform, and Tribal Work Experience Program. All other sections are revised and renumbered to conform to existing programmatic and budgetary statutes and conditions. Also, these regulations have been rewritten in Plain English as required by Executive Order 12866. In keeping with the intent of Plain English, we added more subparts for easier use in reference.

EFFECTIVE DATE:

These regulations take effect on November 20, 2000.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Larry Blair, Chief, Division of Social Services, Department of the Interior, Bureau of Indian Affairs, 1849 C Street, NW., MS-4660-MIB, Washington, DC 20240 at telephone (202) 208-2721.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

We last revised the financial assistance and social services regulations in 25 CFR part 20 in 1985. Since that time, a number of important changes have occurred that are not reflected in the existing regulations. These actions present an opportunity to review the current priorities and policies contained in the regulations and propose changes that conform to existing conditions. We published a proposed rule in the Federal Register on May 6, 1999 (64 FR 24296). We considered the following factors in proposing changes in the current regulations:

• The primary purpose of the amendments is to provide clear, concise regulations that will improve program implementation;
• Congress has enacted a cap on the level of financial assistance funding;
• Existing financial assistance and social services regulations do not provide for the development of tribal welfare reform/redesign plans in accordance with tribal desires and existing law;
• Given fluctuations in financial assistance caseloads and emergencies, it has been difficult to plan and refine the existing service delivery framework;
• The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has made a policy decision to allow Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) payments to be included as one of the grants under Public Law 102-477;
• Public Law 104-193 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA) reduced funding level authorizations and required General Assistance (GA) payments to be equal to the level of state TANF payments; and
• The Indian Child Protection and Family Violence Prevention Act and the Adoption and Safe Families Act have established new standards in child welfare. The regulations need revision to incorporate and consolidate additional child protection and permanency planning requirements.

The Bureau continues to support the policy that Indian people are eligible and should receive financial assistance and social services from local state, county, and city resources on the same basis as non-Indians. For the purposes of simplifying the locations where we will provide the financial assistance and social services program, we use the term “service area” in these regulations and tell you how to get a service area if one does not yet exist.

Summary of the Rule

The rule provides tribes the option of operating their own general assistance program through a redesign plan which incorporates welfare reform or utilizing the Bureau's revised regulations on general assistance as a program standard for operation. In addition, the rule provides clear concise guidance for operation of other program components including Adult Care Assistance, Burial Assistance, Child Assistance, Disaster Assistance, Emergency Assistance, Services to Children, Elderly and Families and Tribal Work Experience Program. These Bureau programs do not replace any existing services, but in many instances interface with existing federal, state, county and tribal programs. Many of these governmental public assistance programs have been modified and revised as a result of PRWORA and the Bureau has the task of distinguishing and describing its programs to prevent duplication of services. Much tribal input was received both during the comment period and in prior meetings with tribal leaders and program officials.

The final rule reflects this input and provides tribes with choices as to how they might proceed with their own versions of welfare reform. In addition, the rule clarifies specific eligibility criteria for applicants and describes where services may be provided for eligible applicants. The program will continue to be based upon need and the annual distribution of funds is based upon the number of cases and lack of other resources to meet need.

Review of Public Comments

Appeal means a written request for correction of an action or decision of a specific program decision by a Bureau official (§ 20.700) or a tribal official (§ 20.705).

No comments were received on this definition.

Applicant means an Indian individual or person by or on whose behalf an application for financial assistance and/or social services has been made under this part.

One commenter recommended an applicant be an “enrolled Indian.”

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. The definition of “Indian” states that an Indian is a member of a federally recognized tribe that is recognized by the Bureau of Indian Affairs to receive service. The definition was not changed because the term “Indian” indicates the applicant is a member of a tribe that is recognized by the Federal Government to receive service.

Application means the written or oral process through which a request is made for financial assistance or social services.

One commenter stated the requirement of a written application was in conflict with § 20.600(a) which states an application may be written or oral. This section was renumbered as § 20.601 in the final rule.

Response: This recommendation was adopted. The language was changed to state that an application can be oral or written.

Area Director means the Bureau official in charge of an Area Office.

One commenter stated that Area Director had changed to Regional Director.

Response: This recommendation was adopted and the definition was changed to Regional Director.

Assistant Secretary means the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

No comments were received on this definition.

Authorized representative means a parent or other caretaker relative, conservator, legal guardian, foster parent, attorney, paralegal acting under the supervision of an attorney, friend or other spokesperson duly authorized and acting on behalf or representing the applicant or recipient.

No comments were received on this definition.

Bureau means the Bureau of Indian Affairs of the United States Department of the Interior.

No comments were received on this definition.

Bureau Standard of Assistance means payment standards established by the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs for Burial, Disaster, Emergency, and Adoption and Guardianship subsidy. In accordance with Pub. L. 104-193, the Bureau Standard of Assistance for General Assistance is the state rate for TANF in the state where the applicant lives. Child Assistance and Foster Care rates are in accordance with Title IV of the Social Security Act (49 Stat. 620) and Pub. L. 104-193.

Some commenters raised the following questions: (1) What authority under Pub. L. 104-193 is used as the basis for the Bureau Standard of Assistance for General Assistance and Foster Care? (2) Why is the Bureau required to use Foster Care rates in accordance with Title IV of the Social Security Act? (3) What Bureau Standard of Assistance is used for multi-state tribes? (4) Why shouldn't the Bureau Standard of Assistance be an amount equal to the larger of either the state or tribal TANF amount? (5) Why should the Bureau set their own Standard of Assistance? (6) What is the Bureau's definition for financial assistance?

Response: These recommendations were partially adopted. Pub. L. 104-193 does require the Bureau General Assistance payment levels be tied to the state TANF rate including ratable reduction. Child Assistance was deleted from the reference to rates as Foster Care rates should have been the only service referenced. By tradition, the Bureau has used state Foster Care rates for Indian children requiring care. Based on the Bureau's experience, this is the most equitable payment level for Foster Care, and the Bureau continues to use the state established Foster Care rates for this purpose. The Bureau acknowledges the need to explain service delivery where a reservation extends into more than one state and added language to that effect. There may be instances when the General Assistance rate would be a larger amount than the state TANF rate if the tribe has chosen to redesign their General Assistance program. The Bureau Standard of Assistance for Adult Care Assistance and TWEP will be added to the definition because these services were added under financial assistance. Additionally, adult and adult care will be added as definitions. The Bureau has the discretion to establish payment standards for unmet needs that it does not routinely provide, such as Emergency Assistance, Adoption or Guardianship subsidy; therefore, these rates will be established by the Assistant Secretary. The Burial Assistance payment level will also remain an indigent Burial Assistance rate, and the rate will continue to be established by the Assistant Secretary. The Bureau has limited experience in dealing with natural disasters, but has coordinated assistance with Red Cross and Federal Emergency Management Assistance (FEMA) when disaster occurs on Indian reservations. The Assistant Secretary will establish payment rates for allowable expense(s) when disaster strikes an Indian reservation. The payment levels established by the Assistant Secretary will be reviewed and updated periodically. The Bureau will add a definition for financial assistance to add clarity.

Burial Assistance means a financial assistance payment made on behalf of an indigent eligible Indian person who meets the eligibility criteria to provide minimum burial expenses according to the Bureau payment standards established by the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

One commenter requested deletion of “indigent.” Other commenters recommended the tribe establish their own Burial Assistance payment level. One commenter recommended judgement funds not be counted as income toward the Burial Assistance payment.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The Bureau's Burial Assistance has always been used for eligible Indians who are “indigent,” and who have no resources available to be used for Burial Assistance. The Bureau will continue to make this assistance for “indigent” Indians, only, and will retain the discretion to establish an indigent burial rate. Judgement funds that are exempted by federal law(s) are not counted as income by the Bureau for the purpose of federal assistance.

Case means all individuals in the household.

Some commenters stated that the definition for case was too simplified and needed to be further defined.

Response: The recommendations were adopted and the definition was changed.

Case management means the activity of a social services worker in assessing client and family problem(s), case planning, coordinating and linking services for clients, monitoring service provisions and client progress, advocacy, tracking and evaluating services provided, such as evaluation of child's treatment being concurrent with parent's treatment, and provision of aftercare service. Activities may also include resource development and providing other direct services such as accountability of funds, data collection, reporting requirements, and documenting activities in the case file.

Some commenters stated that social services staff cannot perform this function without additional resources, and one commenter stated that this is a practice issue, and should not be part of the Bureau's definitions.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The need for additional resources to accomplish case management was not addressed as this is not a regulatory issue. The Bureau disagreed with the comment that this definition is primarily a practice issue. The Bureau views this definition as a quality control method used by a social services worker and his/her supervisor to track cases to ensure appropriate services are provided. In addition, a review system is established to determine client progress and link resources that may be needed to institute change. This definition will be of assistance to case managers for maintaining data collection and/or information required by federal laws and for documenting the need for welfare assistance funds.

Case plan means a signed written plan with time limited goals which is developed and signed by the service recipient and social services worker. The plan will include documentation of referral and ineligibility for other services. The plan must incorporate the steps needed to assist individuals and families to resolve social, economic, psychological, interpersonal, and/or other problems, to achieve self-sufficiency and independence. All plans for children in Foster Care must include a time specific goal of the return of the child to the home or initiation of a guardianship/adoption.

Some commenters requested explanation as to when permanency plans should be included in case plans. One wanted a clarification as to how the case plan differed from the Individual Self-sufficiency Plan (ISP).

Response: These recommendations were partially adopted. Permanency plans should be developed and included in case plans for all out of home placements including residential care. The definition of “Permanency Plan” includes language that allows tribes to establish a permanency plan for children that are consistent with their tribal codes. ISP is specific action(s) which a General Assistance recipient must accomplish in order to become employed and retain employment. The definition for the ISP states that this plan will be incorporated into the Case Plan, or in essence, the ISP is only one part of the Case Plan.

Child means an Indian person under the age of 18 or such other age of majority as may be established for purposes of parental support by tribal or state law (if any) applicable to the person at his or her residence, except that no person who has been emancipated by marriage will be deemed a child.

One commenter recommended that children should be exempted from employment as indicated in § 20.315.

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. Section 20.315 states that the employment policy does not apply to a full time student under the age of 19. The definition was revised to provide clarity.

Child Assistance means financial assistance provided on behalf of an Indian child, or an Indian under age 18, who is not eligible for any other state or federal assistance as documented in the case file and who requires placement in a foster home or specialized non-medical care facility, in accordance with standards of payments established by the state in which they reside pursuant to the foster care program under Title IV of the Social Security Act (49 Stat. 620), or has special needs as specified in § 20.100.

Some commenters requested that the term “Child Welfare Assistance” be retained, and some stated the Bureau should retain the current Child Welfare Assistance language that allows assistance to be provided to Indian children until they reach age 22. Some commenters stated that this definition should include payments for adoption subsidies, guardianship subsidies, homemaker, day care, and other out of home placements that use child assistance funds. One commenter stated that the change in terminology emphasizes service to children and moves away from the idea that this is not “welfare.”

Response: These recommendations were partially adopted. The Bureau provides child assistance to eligible Indian children who are under age 18, because this is the age recognized nationally when a child is considered to be an adult. The Bureau retained the new terminology “Child Assistance” because the emphasis of this program component is upon the well-being of children within the family unit. When the family encounters difficulties, a temporary out-of-home placement or respite assistance may be necessary to preserve the family. The cost associated with guardianship subsidy and adoption subsidy is addressed under the Bureau Standard of Assistance, and the expenses related to homemaker, day care and respite service are considered “Special Needs” as specified in § 20.100. The definition was revised to include all the types of services that are provided under child assistance.

Designated representative means an official of the Bureau who is designated by a Superintendent to hold a hearing as prescribed in §§ 20.700 through 20.705 and who has had no prior involvement in the proposed decision under § 20.602 and whose hearing decision under §§ 20.700 through 20.705 will have the same force and effect as if rendered by the Superintendent.

Some commenters requested the addition of a “designated tribal official” for tribal contracts or compacts.

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. This recommendation was not added because tribes have authority to develop their own policies and procedures to handle appeals at § 20.705.

Disaster means a situation where a tribal community is adversely affected by a natural disaster or other forces which pose a threat to life, safety, or health as specified in §§ 20.327 and 20.328.

One commenter recommended the addition of “man made” disasters, and another recommended the addition of a tribal community disaster definition which would describe economic failures in the fishing and agriculture industries. Another commenter stated that tribal communities should declare their own disasters.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The Bureau retained the disaster assistance definition, because there is no limit as to how man made disasters may be interpreted. As indicated in other areas of this regulation, the Bureau's financial resources are residual. The primary responsibility for service delivery for natural disasters is the Red Cross and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), and state agencies and tribes should contact them to request disaster assistance. In the event assistance and/or services cannot be obtained from other resources, the tribe can make a request to the Bureau for disaster assistance. The process to be used by a tribe to declare a disaster is addressed at § 20.328. The recommendation to include economic disasters was not accepted because general assistance, and other state assistance such as TANF are available to meet economic hardships of individuals needing financial assistance.

Emergency means a situation where an individual or family's home and personal possessions are either destroyed or damaged through forces beyond their control as specified in § 20.329.

Some commenters stated that Emergency Assistance is too narrowly defined and should include conditions for emergency food, transportation and loss of heat in a winter storm.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The Bureau's General Assistance and other assistance (TANF and Food Stamps) should be used to meet food needs, and transportation needs. If the winter storm is extensive in nature and poses a threat to life, safety or health, then such a request for assistance should be handled as a disaster as specified in §§ 20.327 and 20.328.

Employable means an eligible Indian person who is physically and mentally able to obtain employment, and who is not exempt from seeking employment in accordance with the criteria specified in § 20.315.

One commenter stated that in addition to being physically and mentally able to obtain employment, the person should have a high school diploma or General Equivalency Diploma (GED) to be considered employable.

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. This recommendation is not accepted because an individual is not required to have a high school diploma or GED to be considered employable. The purpose of this regulation is to work with general assistance recipients and help them to become employed. It is preferable that individuals have a high school diploma or GED, but this is not a requirement to be considered employable.

Essential needs means shelter, food, clothing and utilities, as included in the standard of assistance in the state where the eligible applicant lives.

One commenter recommended that tribes establish their own definition for essential needs.

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. Nationwide, the need determination for any state standard of assistance at a minimum includes food, shelter, clothing and utilities; therefore, the Bureau will retain the definition of essential needs.

Extended family means persons related by blood, marriage or as defined by Indian custom.

Some commenters requested that “tradition” replace the word “custom,” and one commenter wanted language to insure that where tribal codes for family existed they would take precedence. Some commenters requested the inclusion of “Kinship care” into this definition. One commenter recommended revising the definition as follows: Extended family will be defined by tribal law or custom, or in the absence of such law or custom, means a grandparent, grandchild, aunt or uncle, brother or sister, brother-in-law or sister-in-law, niece or nephew, first or second cousin, or stepparent or stepchild.

Response: These recommendations were partially adopted. The inclusion of kinship care was not accepted, because kinship care is related to placement of children with relatives and/or the placement practice of a social service agency; however, the Bureau will include a reference to tribal law to ensure that existing tribal laws take precedence.

Family assessment means a social services evaluation of a family's abilities and resources to provide the necessary care and supervision for the children, and individuals within the family's current living situation and is included in the case file.

Some commenters stated that the definition is limited and the language “is included in the file” is not a definition. Some commenters recommended the addition of clinical or social service evaluation to this definition to clarify what should be included in the assessment.

Response: These recommendations were partially adopted. The definition of family assessment was revised to include social services assessment. In addition, § 20.404 was added to specify the minimum requirements needed in a social services assessment.

Foster Care Services means those social services provided when an Indian child lives away from the family home.

Some commenters stated that the definition is vague and too general.

Response: This recommendation was adopted. The definitions of foster care services was revised to provide clarity and examples were provided.

General Assistance means a secondary or residual source of financial assistance payments to eligible Indian individuals for essential needs as provided and pursuant to §§ 20.300 through 20.319.

One commenter stated that the regulation must specify that general assistance is “temporary,” and another stated that general assistance should be provided only to “enrolled eligible Indians” of a federally recognized tribe. Another commenter suggested simplifying the definition.

Response: These recommendations were partially adopted. General Assistance is temporary assistance and eligibility is reviewed periodically. There is a process for review of recipient eligibility every 3 months for employables and every 6 months for unemployables. The language “eligible Indian individuals” in the definition in § 20.100 indicates that enrolled Indians of a federally recognized tribe may apply for general assistance. The reference to secondary or residual source was deleted.

Head of household means the persons in the household with whom the household members live and who makes application for benefits.

Some commenters stated that this definition needs to be redefined and clarified. One commenter stated that the definition should include language stating that one person can be the head of household, rather than a number of persons.

Response: These recommendations were adopted. The definition was changed to clarify that one person was the head of household and financially responsible for the other members.

Homemaker services means those non-medical services purchased or contracted for individuals who are not eligible for any other programs such as Medicaid/Medicare as documented in the case file. These individuals must be under the supervision of a social services agency which is administered by a person trained in such skills as child care and home management to prevent out-of-home placement.

Some commenters recommended the deletion of the second sentence in the definition and deletion of “Medicaid/Medicare,” because this is a “policy” statement rather than a definition. One commenter stated that the definition is vague and needs clarity and should include homemaker services for adults and children and a reference should be made to residential care.

Response: These recommendations were partially adopted. References to Medicaid/Medicare were deleted as they were unnecessary and the addition of adults and children was not accepted as the use of individuals implies both adults and children as beneficiaries of this service. Residential Care was added and referenced and the definition was rewritten.

Household means persons living together who may or may not be related to the “head of household.”

Some commenters requested that the definition be revised taking into consideration the existence of multiple households and the practice of accepting roommates when determining payment amounts. Another commenter stated that there is a need for the language “who function as members of a family unit.”

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The process for calculation of payments in a multiple household is addressed at § 20.313. The recommendation to include, “who function as members of a family unit” is not necessary because there is a legal obligation to support family members. There are circumstances when individuals who are not related to the head of household may be considered as additional persons in a general assistance household.

Indian means any person who is a member of any of those tribes listed in the Federal Register, pursuant to 25 CFR part 83, as recognized by and receiving services from the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

Some commenters stated that this definition should specify enrolled member or be simplified.

Response: This recommendation was partially adopted. Membership is determined by tribes, and eligible members can receive services. The definition was revised and simplified.

Indian court means Indian tribal court or court of Indian offenses.

Some commenters recommended the deletion of “Court of Indian Offenses.”

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. Court of Indian Offenses was not deleted because this is the official name of a court operated by the United States Government.

Indian tribe means an Indian or Alaska Native tribe, band, nation, pueblo, village, or community that the Secretary of the Interior acknowledges to exist as an Indian tribe pursuant to Public Law 103-454, 108 Stat. 4791.

Some commenters requested retention of the current definition which states Alaska Native Village or regional or village corporation and asked that the definition be simplified.

Response: This recommendation was adopted. The definition was revised and simplified.

Individual Self-Sufficiency Plan (ISP) means a plan designed to meet the goal of employment through specific action steps and is incorporated within the case plan. The plan is jointly developed and signed by the general assistance recipient and social services worker.

Some commenters stated that they objected to the addition of an ISP because this requirement will be burdensome. One commenter stated the self-sufficiency may be in conflict with the state's self-sufficiency plan if the applicant is coming to general assistance from a TANF program.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. We acknowledge the development and implementation of an ISP may be burdensome, but it is good social work practice to have ISP's for employable general assistance recipients. Both the general assistance and TANF programs' expectation is to attain employment in order to become self-sufficient, and although the specific action steps to be taken to obtain employment for general assistance may not be the same as TANF, the ultimate goal is the same.

Need means the deficit after consideration of income and other resources necessary to meet the cost of essential need items and special need items as defined by the Bureau standard of assistance for the state in which the applicant or recipient resides.

No comments were received on this definition.

Non-medical care means financial assistance for room and board services for individuals in non-medical care facilities. These individuals must not be eligible for SSI or any other federal or state programs and this information must be documented in the case file.

Some commenters asked if “non-medical service” is the same as “non-medical care” as the definition was confusing and should be revised or deleted. One commenter requested changing the words “must not” to “should not.” Another commenter requested clarification in terms of what was considered as residential care services.

Response: This recommendation was adopted. This definition was deleted to avoid confusion and the definition of residential care services was added.

Permanency plan means the documentation in a case plan which provides for permanent living alternatives for the child in foster care who is not eligible for any other federal or state program. Permanency plans are developed in accordance with tribal, cultural, and tribal/state legal standards when the parent or guardian is unable to resolve the issues that require out-of-home placement of the children.

Some commenters recommended permanency plans be developed in accordance with ICWA language.

Response: This recommendation was partially adopted. Reference to ICWA was unnecessary in this definition. The definition was revised to include a description of the circumstances where a permanency plan may be required and language indicating that a plan has been developed and implemented.

Protective services means those services necessary to protect an individual who is the victim of an alleged and/or substantiated incident of abuse, neglect or exploitation. In coordination with law enforcement and tribal courts, this may include placement of the individual out of the home to assure the safety of the individual while the allegations are being investigated. Social workers will not remove individuals from their homes without a court order except in life threatening situations. Protective services can also include provision of social services in the home, the coordination and referral to other programs/services and the involvement of Child Protection and/or Multi-Disciplinary Teams.

Some commenters objected to the sentence, “Social Workers will not remove individuals from their homes without a court order except in life or death situations.” One commenter requested additional clarity in explaining responsibility under protective services.

Response: These recommendations were adopted. The justification for changing this language to read that social services workers can remove individuals in life threatening situations was accepted by the Bureau and the language was revised. Repetitive language was deleted and language was added to clarify that social services has responsibility for supervision of Individual Indian Money accounts.

Public assistance means those programs of financial assistance provided by state, tribal, county, local and federal organizations including programs under Title IV of the Social Security Act (49 Stat. 620), as amended, and Public Law 104-193.

No comments were received on this definition.

Recipient is an individual or person who has been determined as eligible through documentation in the case file and is receiving financial assistance under this part.

No comments were received on this definition. This definition was revised for simplification.

Recurring income means any cash or in-kind payment, earned or unearned, received on a monthly, quarterly, semiannual, or annual basis.

No comments were received on this definition.

Resources means income and other liquid assets available to an Indian person or household to meet current essential needs, unless otherwise specifically excluded by federal statute. Liquid assets are those items in the form of cash or other financial instruments which can be converted to cash, such as savings or checking accounts, promissory notes, mortgages and similar properties, and retirements and annuities.

One commenter recommended the deletion of “other financial instruments which can be converted to cash.” Another commenter requested the exclusion of the value of the “primary residence.”

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. This definition is the same definition of resources in the current regulations, 25 CFR part 20, and deletion of this language would lead to confusion. The value of the primary residence of individuals applying for assistance/services is not a countable resource.

Secretary means the Secretary of the Interior.

No comments were received on this definition.

Service area means:

(1) Reservations;

(2) Areas adjacent or adjoining reservations;

(3) Allotments outside the reservations;

(4) Areas defined as reservations or service areas by statute; and/or

(5) Other defined areas designated by the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs pursuant to this part.

Some commenters requested that this definition be simplified. Other commenters recommended that near reservation and reservation be added to the definition.

Response: These recommendations were adopted. A new definition was developed for service area and the definitions for near reservation and reservation were added.

Services to children, elderly and families means social services, including protective services, not including money payments, provided through the social work skills of casework, group work or community development to assist in solving social problems involving children, elderly and families.

One commenter requested the retention of existing language at 25 CFR 20.24 (Family and Community Services), and one commenter recommended deletion of the word “elderly” in the title. Another commenter stated that they wanted clarification of what services will be provided to the elderly population.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The title, “Services to Children, Elderly and Families” is used in the budget justification and the title was retained as it accurately describes the program. The services to be provided under this part are non-money payment social services to children, elderly, and families.

Special needs means a financial assistance payment made to/or on behalf of individuals who have extenuating, non-medical circumstances which warrant a one-time annual financial assistance payment when other resources are not available and the circumstances are documented in the case files.

Some commenters recommended the deletion of “one-time annual financial assistance payment” and requested clarification whether this category of assistance applied to both adults and children.

Response: These recommendations were adopted. The one-time annual financial assistance payment limitation was deleted to allow greater flexibility. In addition, examples were provided to clarify the types of services that are considered to be special needs. Special needs have historically been limited to children's special needs, and not adults.

Subsidized guardianship means a payment of a monthly subsidy, not to exceed 2 years, for the child in long-term, court approved guardianship placements. The child must not be eligible for any other federal or state program and this must be documented in the case file.

Some commenters requested deletion of the 2-year limitation and requested an additional reference to social services.

Response: This recommendation was adopted. We are in agreement with the recommendation and deleted the 2-year limitation. The definition was revised for simplification and was termed “guardianship” and a reference was added for social services.

Substitute care means the provision of foster care or any in-home, out-of-home, or relative placement of the children by someone other than a parent.

Some commenters stated this definition was confusing because it appeared to be interchangeable with the foster care at § 20.509 which was renumbered in the final rule as § 20.507.

Response: This recommendation was adopted. This definition was deleted because it was unnecessary.

Superintendent means the Bureau official in charge of an agency office.

No comments were received on this definition.

Supplemental Security Income (SSI) means cash assistance provided under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (49 Stat. 620), as amended.

Some commenters requested deletion of “those programs of,” and replaced with “cash.”

Response: This recommendation was adopted. This definition was revised to provide clarity.

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) means one of the programs of financial assistance provided under the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (PRWORA).

No comments were received on this definition.

Tribal governing body means the federally recognized governing body of an Indian tribe.

No comments were received on this definition.

Tribal redesign plan means a tribally designed method for changing general assistance eligibility and/or payment levels in accordance with appropriation language so as to reduce dependence on general assistance as specified in §§ 20.203 through 20.211.

No comments were received on this definition. This definition was revised to accurately reflect that this authority is codified and no longer limited to appropriation language.

Tribal Work Experience Program (TWEP) means a program operated by tribal contract/grant or self-governance annual funding agreement, which provides eligible participants with work experience and training that promotes and preserves work habits and develops work skills aimed toward self-sufficiency. The Bureau payment standard is established by the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

Some commenters recommended that the TWEP definition include: gaining special experience, training and acquiring skills and knowledge necessary to qualify, access and retain employment.

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. These goals and objectives are already part of the ongoing General Assistance/TWEP program.

Unemployable means a person who meets the criteria specified in § 20.315.

Some commenters stated the definition was “demeaning,” and others recommended clarification. One commenter suggested that this definition be reworded to specify that Unemployable means a person that is exempted from the employment policy at § 20.314.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The definition conveys the meaning and does not need rewording.

Section 20.101 What Is the Purpose of This Part?

Several commenters stated that other Bureau program entities such as TWEP and Adult Services should be added to this section to better explain the types of services available.

Response: This recommendation was adopted. Financial assistance and social services were added to this section and described in terms of kinds of service.

Section 20.102 What Is the Bureau's Policy in Providing Financial Assistance and Social Services Under This Part?

Some commenters stated that the Bureau program descriptions should be expanded to include employment and educational activity and that it be clarified that in some instances the Bureau programs were supplementing other agency programs on behalf of certain individuals. Some other commenters requested that the language be expanded to clarify that in certain states the Bureau programs are not comparable to county or state services and therefore should be of a primary nature. One commenter recommended adding a reference to self-sufficiency.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The Bureau regulations encompass financial assistance and social services and language that would address employment and educational activity would unjustly imply that the Bureau was revising parts 26 and 27 and folding them into part 20 and that is not the case. The Bureau's policy has always been that the social services program is secondary and is not to be used to supplement or supplant other programs and any language allowing the funds to be used otherwise would endanger the integrity of these funds and could lead to misuse of these limited funds. In response to the request for exemptions where there are variations in public assistance programs by county or state, existing regulations in part 1 provide a process for waiver if there is an unusual situation which requires special attention because applicants are being deprived of services. Reference to self-sufficiency is not necessary in the context of this section as references are made in subsequent sections. The Bureau renumbered (a) and (b) for clarity.

Section 20.103 Have the Information Collection Requirements in This Part Been Approved by the Office of Management and Budget?

No comments were received on this section.

Subpart B—Welfare Reform

Section 20.200 What Contact Will the Bureau Maintain With State, Tribal, County, Local, and Other Federal Agency Programs?

Some commenters stated that the Bureau should work closer with all other public assistance service providers to insure that there is no duplication and that individual client's needs are being met without limiting services to existing financial resources. One commenter suggested that “will” be deleted from the first sentence. Another commenter recommended language referencing tribes in the statement.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The Bureau has been and will continue to work with all federal and state agencies responsible for the provision of services to Indian people. Additional language to emphasize this point was not necessary. Although it is ideal to have funding available to meet all of the needs of every applicant, in reality all programs are limited by the funds they have and must adhere to the specific criteria for their own programs. The use of “will” in the first sentence effectively conveys the intent of the Bureau and was not deleted. The reference to “we” in the statement above implies all providers of services and remains in the regulations.

Secton 20.201 How Does the Bureau Designate a Service Area and What Information Is Required?

Some commenters stated that the Bureau should ensure that all eligible Indian members within the reservation, near reservation or service area be provided services and that language to that effect should be placed in the regulations and that tribes be sanctioned if they do not comply. Another commenter stated that limiting services to only tribal members was necessary for budgetary purposes. Some commenters requested that time frames be placed upon the Bureau to process requests for designation as near reservation or service area. Some commenters asked that “Indian community” be defined in more specific terms. One commenter requested that service area be defined as places where tribal members reside with no specific geographic area designated. Another commenter stated that tribes should have the flexibility to define their own service area. One commenter stated that they wanted service area to remain the same unless tribal governments request a change. Another commenter stated that it was unreasonable to require tribes to provide documentation for evaluation when they submit their request for service area designation. Another commenter stated that this section should be deleted and tribes should be allowed to accomplish this by tribal resolution. Another commenter requested that the definition of reservation which is in the current regulations and which contains reference to Alaska Native regions established pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (85 Stat. 688) and Indian Allotments be retained. Another commenter recommended that “can” in (b) be replaced with “will” to make it mandatory. One commenter stated that the language in (c)(2) which was renumbered as (a)(2) in the final rule was too vague in that comparable services between California counties and the Bureau programs is a point of contention and needs to be resolved before the regulations can be put in final. Another commenter questioned (d)(1) which was renumbered as (b)(l) in the final rule as to whether “administratively feasible” applied to the tribe or the Bureau. Another commenter questioned the use of the language that tribes had to document that the proposed service area would not include counties or parts thereof that have reasonably available comparable services. Another commenter requested clarification whether tribes having reservations and near reservation designations would be required to obtain a service area designation.

Response: These recommendations were partially adopted. The Bureau added language to ensure that all eligible Indian members within the reservation, near reservation or service area receive services. Time frames were not necessary for processing these requests as the number of requests for designation are very limited and will not require significant staff time. The term “Indian community” was deleted because it is unnecessary as a requirement for designation. Service area cannot be defined as any place where a tribal member resides in the United States or by any means that a tribe chooses because operation of the program would not be administratively or financially feasible if this language was accepted. Service areas do not change unless and until a tribe requests the change and documentation must be provided to give the Bureau sufficient facts to approve the request. This section was not deleted because this designation is a significant action with budgetary and policy ramifications. The Bureau added the definition for reservation which includes reference to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (85 Stat. 688) and Indian Allotments. In addition, the definition for near reservation was added. The language stating that the Assistant Secretary can designate or modify service areas for a tribe in (b) was retained in the final rule as this conveys the intent of this section. The Bureau retained the language of reasonably available comparable services in (c)(2) and this subsection was renumbered as (a)(2) in the final rule to avoid duplication of services. The requirement of documentation for evaluation to support the service area designation as being “administratively feasible” was retained. The tribe requesting the designation is responsible for making sure the proposed area can be served within available funding constraints. Those tribes with reservations and near reservations as existing service areas are not required to request designation unless they request a modified geographic location as a service area.

Section 20.202 What Does Financial Assistance Include?

Some commenters requested that financial assistance be included in § 20.100 as a definition.

Response: This recommendation was accepted and the definition for financial assistance was added in § 20.100 and this section was deleted.

Section 20.203 What Is a Tribal Redesign Plan?

Some commenters asked why the Bureau was implementing the redesign at this time and asked what authority did the Bureau have to allow changes in general assistance eligibility criteria and payment levels. One commenter requested that the section include language giving approval for the redesign of child assistance. This commenter also requested language to the effect that redesigned programs may be expanded if appropriation language in the future expands the number of programs that could be redesigned. One commenter stated that redesign plans in Oklahoma would require additional funds. Another commenter requested further clarification of this section. Another commenter stated that tribes already have authority to redesign the general assistance program.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. Congress specifically gave tribes the authority to redesign general assistance. No similar specific authority currently exists for tribes to redesign additional programs; therefore, no additional language was added to include child assistance. The language stating that the redesign will not result in additional expenses for the Bureau if additional expenses are solely the result of increased payment levels is statutory. This section provides clarity as to the intent of the Bureau.

Section 20.204 Can a Tribe Incorporate Assistance From Other Sources Into a Tribal Redesign Plan?

One commenter stated that the Bureau should add language to the effect that all welfare assistance programs should be allowed to be included with a Pub. L. 102-477 grant, a Public Law 103-413 self-governance annual funding agreement, or a tribal redesign plan. Another commenter stated that tribes needed flexibility to use these funds to meet members' needs according to how the tribes identified these needs. Another commenter stated that this section should be rewritten to better describe the redesign in relation to Pub. L. 102-477. Another commenter asked if TANF could be included as a part of the tribal redesign plan.

Response: These recommendations were partially adopted. The Bureau does not have the authority to include all of the welfare assistance programs in a redesign. Adequate flexibility is available for tribes to redesign their programs. Tribal redesign and Pub. L. 102-477 are separate tools for tribes to use while exercising self-determination. The section was rewritten to better convey the concept of funding from other sources.

Section 20.205 Must All Tribes Submit a Tribal Redesign Plan?

One commenter stated that the table of contents mistakenly worded this section by using the word “develop” instead of “submit.”

Response: This recommendation was adopted. The Table of Contents will be corrected to read “submit” rather than “develop.”

Section 20.206 Can Tribes Change Eligibility Criteria or Levels of Payments for General Assistance?

Some commenters requested clarification in terms of who is to provide technical assistance and what level of funding would be used for the redesign plans. Another commenter wanted it clarified that tribes are not required to do a redesign if they did not want to pursue it. One commenter requested clarification as to how this section might affect Oklahoma. One commenter requested inclusion of child and adult assistance in this section. One commenter suggested deletion of (d) as it was redundant.

Response: These recommendations were partially adopted. The Bureau or Office of Self-Governance will provide technical assistance on redesigned plans. The existing language is sufficient to convey that the redesign is not mandatory. It is unknown how this section might affect the State of Oklahoma, because tribes propose redesign plans and it is unknown whether any tribes in Oklahoma will attempt redesign plans. In answer to the comment made about the funding level to be used, the Bureau will add language that the funding for the program will be the same funding received in the most recent fiscal or calendar year, whichever applies.

Section 20.207 Must a Tribe Get Approval for a Tribal Redesign Plan?

Some commenters pointed out that existing procedures are in effect whereby self-governance tribes routinely obtain approval for their annual funding agreements through the Office of Self-Governance and changing this process for redesign plans would be disruptive and counterproductive and that this language requiring approval by the Regional Director should be deleted. One commenter recommended that criteria be added specifying what is needed to obtain approval.

Response: These recommendations were partially adopted. The Bureau did not delete this section but added language that clarifies who will approve the tribal redesign plan. The Office of Self-Governance will continue to be the point of contact for self-governance tribes. The Bureau plans to develop a technical assistance package that will assist tribes in formulating redesign plans; however, technical assistance documentation will not be codified in regulation.

Section 20.208 Can a Tribe Use Savings From a Tribal Redesign Plan To Meet Other Priorities of the Tribe?

One commenter questioned how a general assistance program could remain a need-based program if there were savings which could be used for other priorities. Another commenter requested the Bureau to explain the different types of TPA funding in this section. Another commenter stated that an equitable level of funding should be established before the start-up of the redesign plan.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The regulation and statutory language give tribes the ability to use cost savings for other priorities only in the case of the general assistance redesign. A discussion of the TPA and the Bureau's budget process is not appropriate for this regulation. The level of funding for the start-up of the redesign has been added in § 20.205.

Section 20.209 What If the Tribal Redesign Plan Leads to Increased Costs?

One commenter stated that with a redesigned program there may be increased costs and if that were the case, the Bureau should assume the additional costs.

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. The Bureau is prohibited from assuming additional costs resulting solely from increased payment levels.

Section 20.210 Can a Tribe Operating Under a Tribal Redesign Plan Go Back to Operating Under This Part?

No comments were received on this section. This section was renumbered as § 20.209 in the final rule.

Section 20.211 Can Eligibility Criteria or Payments for Burial Assistance, Child Assistance, and Disaster Assistance Change?

Some commenters requested an explanation as to why the general assistance program was the only program eligible for redesign. One commenter asked if their tribe could redesign their program eligibility criteria so as to exclude those members who are less than one-quarter blood quantum. Some commenters stated that under part 900 they already had authority to redesign programs. One commenter suggested that the section be deleted. Another commenter stated that tribes financially support, with their own funds, similar programs to the Bureau's welfare assistance programs and requested clarification as to whether they could supplement their programs with the Bureau funds.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The Bureau has no Congressional authority or statute to allow programs including child assistance, disaster assistance, emergency assistance, and burial assistance to be redesigned. The tribes do have the flexibility to restrict services to certain populations of clients in the general assistance program if they choose to do so through a redesign plan and follow § 20.206. This section was retained because language is needed to clarify how tribes may operate their programs under the redesign process. The Bureau cannot supplement tribal programs which are similar in nature because this is a duplication and Bureau funds are a limited resource.

Subpart C—Direct Assistance

Section 20.300 What Are the Basic Eligibility Criteria?

Several commenters stated that (a) of this section is not consistent with § 20.100, definition of an Indian, and both need to be changed to include “enrolled” and “federally recognized Indians of the United States.” Other commenters stated that (a) would result in an increase in cases in Oklahoma because the existing regulations required one-fourth or more blood quantum in addition to being a member in the States of Alaska and Oklahoma. One commenter stated that the basic eligibility criteria contained in (b) of this section means that children and elderly needing protection, and families faced with emergencies must meet income requirements.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The Bureau does not agree that (a) is inconsistent with the definition of Indian. The tribes determine eligibility for enrollment and membership in their respective tribes and the tribes listed in the Federal Register, pursuant to 25 CFR part 83, are recognized as eligible to receive services from the Bureau. Because tribal membership is the responsibility of the tribe, the Bureau is unable to determine the effect upon caseloads in Alaska and Oklahoma. Applicants are required to meet all the basic eligibility criteria of § 20.300 including (b) to receive services.

Section 20.301 What Is the Goal of General Assistance?

One commenter questioned how the Bureau general assistance goals and objectives compared to those of the National PRWORA. They asked if the Bureau supported the goals of reducing out of wedlock pregnancies and increasing collection of child support payments. One commenter requested deletion of “meeting the goal of employment.” One commenter stated that elder assistance should be available nationwide not just in a selective Region and stated that existing services should not be dropped.

Response: These recommendations were partially adopted. The Bureau did not delete the statement about self-sufficiency from the regulations as it is a goal of the General Assistance Program to increase self-sufficiency. TANF goals and objectives are similar to general assistance but not identical. It is the social services worker's responsibility and the individual's right to develop a Self-Sufficiency Plan which maintains the individual's and program's integrity. The Bureau agreed with the comments about the need for adult services and established an Adult Care Program under §§ 20.331 through 20.335.

Section 20.302 Are Indian Applicants Required To Seek Assistance Through TANF?

Several commenters stated that all Indian applicants with dependent children are required to apply for TANF because general assistance is a secondary source. One commenter stated that applicants whose TANF benefits have been reduced due to TANF sanctions may not be eligible to receive general assistance as tribally determined. Another commenter stated these regulations require individuals to follow TANF regulations, and requested deletion of “and follow TANF regulations.”

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The Bureau agreed with the comments that state that all applicants with dependent children are required to apply for TANF as general assistance is a secondary source. The Bureau agrees with the statement that applicants whose TANF benefits have been reduced due to TANF sanctions may not be eligible to receive general assistance even though the tribe is operating a tribal General Assistance program in a Public Law 102-477 grant. The Bureau did not agree with the comment that these regulations cannot force individuals to comply with TANF regulations or the recommendation to delete the requirement to follow TANF regulations. The Bureau was not attempting to regulate TANF. General Assistance is a secondary program; therefore, the applicants must apply and follow the regulations of the primary resource of cash benefits which is TANF.

Section 20.303 When Is an Applicant Eligible for General Assistance?

Two commenters stated that in (d) of this section which was renumbered as (c) in the final rule, the statement “Not receive TANF” should be changed to state “If not directly receiving TANF Cash Aid” and the word “entitlement” be changed to “cash assistance” because it is not the intent of the General Assistance regulations to prohibit a recipient from receiving general assistance while they are receiving other non-cash forms of assistance such as food stamps, surplus commodities, etc. One commenter stated that the ISP/Employment strategy development for each recipient is burdensome for tribes, who receive very little administrative money to administer general assistance and requested section (e) which was renumbered as (d) in the final rule be changed to read “whenever possible.”

Response: These recommendations were partially adopted. The Bureau revised (c) to include language referring to any comparable public assistance to avoid duplication of service. The Bureau did not agree with the recommendation to change section (e) which was renumbered as (d) in the final rule to read “whenever possible” because ISP/employment strategy is necessary for applicants to become self-sufficient.

Section 20.304 When Will the Bureau Review Eligibility for General Assistance?

One commenter stated time limits are not feasible in Alaska.

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. The Bureau did not agree with the statement about time limits in Alaska. At the time of interviewing the applicant and developing the ISP, the social services worker and applicant agree on a plan which documents when eligibility will be redetermined.

Section 20.305 What Does Redetermination Involve?

Some commenters stated that home visits should not be included in redetermining program eligibility. One commenter stated that ISP's were not included in this section.

Response: These recommendations were partially adopted. The Bureau did not agree that home visits should be deleted from this section. The Bureau agreed to add ISP.

Section 20.306 What Is the Payment Standard for General Assistance?

One commenter asked how the Bureau was going to deal with states that pay $100 in TANF funds and recommended provisions to supplement amounts in states having low payment levels for TANF.

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. The Bureau must follow Public Law 104-193 for determining levels of payment; however, the tribe has the option of contracting the TANF Program and/or redesigning the eligibility and payment levels of the General Assistance Program.

Section 20.307 What Resources Does the Bureau Consider When Determining Need?

No comments were received on this section.

Section 20.308 What Does Earned Income Include?

Two commenters stated they would like to have art work, crafts and beading struck from (a) of this section if the applicant/recipient performs the work as a hobby, but the language should remain for professionals.

Response: This recommendation was adopted. If applicant/recipient are professionals, these activities should be considered as earned income for individuals who are self-employed. The Bureau agreed that if the applicant/recipient performs this as a hobby it should be eliminated from consideration as earned income.

Section 20.309 What Does Unearned Income Include?

One commenter stated that “or 25 percent of the state standard, whichever is less” be deleted. One commenter stated that (c) be deleted in its entirety. One commenter questioned how shelter could be provided as in-kind income. One commenter stated that workman compensation settlement payments should be considered as income. One commenter stated that trust dollars should not be included.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The Bureau retained the language in (c) and (e) as these subsections convey the policy of the Bureau which is to include all available items as unearned income. All agencies providing public assistance must consider all sources of income unless there is a specific federal disregard. Income generated from trust land was also retained because it is not included as a federal disregard. Workman compensation would be considered as a resource as defined in § 20.100 rather than unearned income.

Section 20.310 What Recurring Income Must Be Prorated?

No comments were received on this section.

Section 20.311 What Deducted Amounts Will Be Disregarded From the Gross Amount of Earned Income?

One commenter stated that there are instances where general assistance recipients may receive income tax refunds. The commenter stated that language should be added to insure that income tax refunds are counted as income rather than disregarded.

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. Federal and state tax refunds are considered as a resource. This section was revised to clarify that child care costs are deducted for children under the age of 6.

Section 20.312 What Amounts Will Be Disregarded From Income or Other Resources?

One commenter asked if the $2,000 cited in subsection (a) is the statutory disregard of trust resources or an increase of the $1,000 disregard currently in 25 CFR 20.21(g)(2)(i). This commenter stated that this section is unclear and may reduce eligibility requirements making additional individuals eligible for the program. Another commenter requested a list of federal disregards be published in the regulations. One commenter requested that this disregard also apply to children. Another commenter requested addition of (d) to clarify that vehicles are a disregarded resource.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The $2,000 disregard was an increase over the existing $1,000 disregard and does not financially impact the program. A list of federal disregards was not listed in the regulations as these change periodically. The disregard does apply to children as well as adults. The Bureau's program has never included vehicles nor has the issue arisen in the past; therefore, there was no need to clarify this as a resource.

Section 20.313 How Will the Bureau Compute Financial Assistance Payments?

Some commenters requested clarification as to how the Bureau will compute financial assistance payments. Another commenter stated General Assistance grants should be prorated from the date of application. Another commenter stated language needs to be developed for tribal redesign plans. Another commenter stated that the procedure in (b) for prorating shelter costs when two households reside in the same shelter is unclear and may reduce eligibility requirements and thus make additional individuals eligible for the program.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The process for computing financial assistance payments and prorating is clearly explained. For tribes using tribal redesign plans, the same proration described here must be used to determine the amount of approved payments.

Section 20.314 What Is the Policy on Employment?

One commenter stated that for a period of 60 days but not more than 90 days be changed to “for a period of at least 30 days” because the sanction was too severe. Another commenter asked if job search will be eliminated once an ISP is established and agreed upon by the social services worker and recipient.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The length of sanction remains 60-90 days as this was considered to be equitable. The number of job search contacts depends upon what was documented in the ISP.

Section 20.315 When Is the Employment Policy Not Applicable?

One commenter requested more descriptive information in (c) to fully describe the example. Another commenter suggested changing (c) to the recipient must make satisfactory progress in an ISP that leads to employment and add language that states that continued eligibility for the program is also based on satisfactory progress. Another commenter recommended deleting language in (c) that states that “he/she was an active general assistance recipient.” Another commenter suggested in (g) changing the age to 5 and under if they do not attend school/head start. Another commenter asked if educational opportunity was limited to those under 19 and to those that have been active general assistance recipients. Another asked for an explanation of section 5404 of Public Law 100-297. Another commenter suggested deletion of (h) and eliminating the minimum commuting time of one hour each way and replacing it with reasonable travel time. Another commenter recommended adding language stating the employment policy would not apply for a person for whom employment is not accessible in a commuting time that is reasonable and comparable with others in similar circumstances.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. Examples were not needed as the language clearly describes all of the exceptions. Public Law 100-297 cannot be fully explained in these regulations just as other pertinent public laws referenced cannot be fully explained. The temporary medical injury which exceeds 3 months was clarified in terms of eligibility and referral. The commuting time was not changed as it is reasonable.

Section 20.316 What Must a Person Covered by the Employment Policy Do?

One commenter suggested the following change: “If you are covered by the employment policy in § 20.314, you must seek employment in accordance with your ISP.” This will make § 20.316 consistent with § 20.319.

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. The language in § 20.316 is consistent with existing policy in § 20.319 which requires a general assistance recipient to actively seek employment and provide the social services worker with evidence of job search activities.

Section 20.317 How Will the Ineligibility Period Be Implemented?

One commenter asked how the ineligibility period would be implemented and requested additional language as an explanation.

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. This section clearly describes how the ineligibility period is to be implemented by describing why the ineligibility will continue, how the suspension can be reduced, and who is affected by the suspension.

Section 20.318 What Case Management Responsibilities Does the Social Services Worker Have?

One commenter stated social services workers should not have to supervise recipients because of lack of funds and staff and that case managers should help recipients get the services needed to meet their goals in their ISP. Another commenter recommended that social services worker be changed to a family advocate.

Response: These recommendations were partially adopted. Social services workers do have responsibility for assisting recipients to meet their goals in their ISP's and monitoring work related activities. The funding or lack of funding cannot be dealt within the regulations. The term “social services worker” was retained.

Section 20.319 What Responsibilities Does the General Assistance Recipient Have?

One commenter stated that the language “Performs successfully” needs to be explained in (b) and (c) and substitute words like “satisfactory progress.” Another commenter questioned why a recipient must be in treatment and counseling.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The Bureau retained the existing language as it describes participation in a positive context and success or lack of success is evaluated by each social services worker on a case by case basis. Participation in treatment and counseling services are appropriate for some recipients needing these types of services. The policy of the Bureau arranging supportive services and requiring recipient participation is consistent with other social services programs operating at the state and county levels.

Section 20.320 What Is TWEP?

No comments were received on this section.

Section 20.321 Does TWEP Allow an Incentive Payment?

One commenter requested that the payment standards be tribally determined. Another commenter asked whether TWEP was considered an incentive payment.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The payment standard will be determined by the Bureau as this is a budgetary concern. TWEP payments are considered to be incentives.

Section 20.322 Who Is Eligible To Receive a TWEP Incentive Payment?

One commenter recommended deletion of the following language “in situations where the participation is mandatory.” Another commenter suggested the following change: “Where there are multiple family units in one household” to “Where there are more than one household in a dwelling.”

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. Since tribes do have the option of making TWEP mandatory, the language was retained. The existing language regarding family units was retained as it accurately conveys the intent of the section which is where there are multiple family units in one household, one member of each family unit will be eligible to receive the TWEP incentive payment.

Section 20.323 Will the Local TWEP Be Required To Have Written Program Procedures?

One commenter suggested inclusion of language that states local TWEP must have specific written program procedures that cover progress.

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. Progress is documented in the ISP for TWEP participants.

Section 20.324 When Can the Bureau Provide Burial Assistance?

No comments were received on this section.

Section 20.325 What Is the Process for Making Application for Burial Assistance for Eligible Indians?

One commenter suggested changing SSI to SSA lump sum death benefits. Another commenter stated that the standard of payments for burials is currently $1,300 and is not enough to take care of a proper burial and updating these standards should be considered. Another commenter stated, “A tribal cultural wake in accordance to the tribe's culture” should be added. Another suggested that a payment standard should be recommended by the Regional Director or Central Office. Another commenter recommended changing the language to state that requests and applications for Burial Assistance must be submitted within 30 days after the issuance of a Death Certificate rather than following death.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. Social Security lump sums are considered as a resource and additional language was not needed. Payment rates which include cultural wakes will be reviewed periodically and raised if warranted. The Bureau retained existing language that applications need to be submitted within 30 days following death. The Assistant Secretary will establish the standard payment referred to in this section within 60 days after this rule is published in final.

Section 20.326 When Are the Related Transportation Expenses Covered by Burial Assistance?

One commenter stated that it should be up to the tribe to determine when transportation expenses could be paid particularly in those instances when the individual is gone for more than 6 months. Another commenter stated that they were opposed to this section because they had tribal members who have resided outside of the service area for a period of time exceeding 6 consecutive months and this regulation prohibits them from helping these members with burial assistance.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The Bureau has limited eligibility to eligible members who resided in the service area for at least the last 6 consecutive months of his/her life because of budgetary concerns.

Section 20.327 When Can the Bureau Provide Disaster Assistance?

One commenter suggested tribal resolutions should be used to request disaster assistance. Another commenter recommended deletion of “provided” and insertion of the word “available.”

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The language was adequate in stating that disaster assistance can be provided in absence of FEMA and Red Cross.

Section 20.328 How Can a Tribe Apply for Disaster Assistance?

One commenter stated that a tribal resolution requesting disaster assistance should be adequate rather than a Presidential declaration. Another commenter stated that there should be a time limit for response by the Bureau and that (b) should be deleted. One commenter suggested the tribal requests go directly to the Assistant Secretary for a final decision.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The Bureau does not agree that only a tribal resolution should be required, and retained the entire section because the reporting requirements must be met in order to avoid duplication of services and to obtain projections of total need for services. The request for disaster assistance must be processed by the local Bureau office to insure that all necessary documentation is included.

Section 20.329 When Can the Bureau Provide Emergency Assistance Payments?

One commenter suggested language establishing a disaster contingency fund.

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. It is unnecessary to set up such a fund given the limited need for these funds.

Section 20.330 What Is the Payment Standard for Emergency Assistance?

One commenter recommended raising the rates and another stated that this section should only apply to tribes that have their own standards/guidelines for emergency assistance. Another commenter recommended that this section be deleted.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The Assistant Secretary will establish the payment standard referred to in this section within 60 days after this rule is published in final.

Subpart D—Services to Children, Elderly, and Families

Section 20.400 For Whom Should Services to Children, Elderly, and Families Be Provided?

One commenter requested clarification as to the meaning of services to children, elderly and families.

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. The term replaces the category formerly called, “Family and Community Services” which is the non-payment category of services. It was revised in the budget justification at the request of budget analysts because it provides a better description of recipients for whom services are provided.

Section 20.401 What Services Are Included Under Services to Children, Elderly and Families?

One commenter stated that adult care service should be included in this section. Another commenter suggested that chore services should be included in this section. Other commenters recommended that additional funds be distributed to tribes as the work described in this section required more personnel. Another commenter stated that coordination with law enforcement and the courts could not be completed before removal of individuals needing protective services. Some commenters stated that there was confusion as the word “elderly” was used in the section title but within the body of the section “adult” was used consistently. One commenter stated that language should be added to explain that referrals could be made for adults in addition to children. Another commenter stated that language in (b)(4)(ii) which was renumbered as § 20.403(d)(2) was troublesome, specifically the language, “treatment of the identified conditions that are within the competence of social services.” Another commenter made a comparison of this section with the Bureau's current regulation in § 20.24 and stated that in his/her opinion the following services which are included in § 20.24 would be unavailable: Services to responsible family members or guardians to seek appropriate court protections for the child or adult; investigation and reporting of adult abuse and neglect and of delinquency and runaways; and provisions of services by court order for marriage and divorce counseling, child custody, probation, foster care and supervision of children and adults in the home. Another commenter suggested that protective services be explained in more detail.

Response: These recommendations were partially adopted. Adult care assistance was added in subpart C § 20.331-20.335 and explained as a service. Chore service was not added as homemaker adequately describes the service to be provided. Additional funding for social service administration funding was not addressed in the regulations as the budget process is a separate issue from programmatic rulemaking. In response to the comment that in certain instances law enforcement and courts cannot be involved before removal for protective services, the Bureau made an adequate exception in terms of life threatening situations. The Bureau included a definition for “adult” which should clarify who is to be served. The Bureau made a change by adding § 20.403 to make sure that elderly are included in referrals for homemaker services. The Bureau did not change (b)(4)(ii) as it accurately conveys that social service workers will limit services to the profession of social work. The Bureau did not add those sections referenced above in § 20.24 as these are services that a tribe may choose to provide on its own initiative but they are not required by regulation. The Bureau added separate sections §§ 20.402 and 20.403 which explained when protective services are provided and clarified what types of services are provided. The Bureau added § 20.404 to provide further explanation to the term “social services assessment” which was used in § 20.403.

Subpart E—Child Assistance

Section 20.500 What Are the Eligibility Criteria for Child Assistance?

One commenter stated that this section was not consistent with the Indian Child Welfare Act. Another commenter stated that the eligibility criteria should be deleted. Another commenter asked the question if tribes receive Title IV-E funding for foster care will their current Bureau funding for foster care be reduced. One commenter questioned why a documented family assessment was required in (a) which was renumbered as (b)(3) in the final rule. Another commenter stated that special needs in (a) which was renumbered as (b)(2) in the final rule should be defined. Another commenter requested clarification that courts do not make requests but instead issue orders. Another commenter requested an explanation of (d) which was renumbered as (f) in the final rule in terms of what is the meaning of all income accruing to children. Another commenter asked if relative care givers under (d) which was renumbered as (c) in the final rule would have to apply to state TANF and be denied payments or other assistance. Another commenter asked for language to allow general assistance to supplement TANF. Some commenters stated that in (e) where the word “must” was used that it should be replaced by the word “will” and another commenter stated that (e) should be deleted. One commenter stated that some of the services in subpart E are duplicated in subpart D and should be consolidated in subpart D. Another commenter noted a typographic error because “and” was not inserted after (a), (b) and (d). One commenter recommended that the residential care rate be computed the same way as the foster care rate.

Response: These recommendations were partially adopted. This regulation did not address the Indian Child Welfare Act as that is addressed in part 23. Eligibility criteria were not deleted as criteria are needed to determine eligibility. In response to the question as to whether child assistance funding would be decreased if tribes received Title IV-E funding for foster care, the Bureau continues to operate the program as a need-based program. A documented family assessment is required so that the social services worker can make the best decision possible for eligibility and placement. “Special needs” was defined in § 20.100. There is no confusion in (a) that courts issue orders rather than make requests. The Bureau deleted (c), (d) and (e) and renumbered (f) to (c) for the purpose of clarity. The Bureau services described in subparts D and E remain where they are located because they are differentiated by payment or non-payment services. The typographic errors were corrected. The residential care rate was modified to be consistent with the foster care rate.

Section 20.501 What Are the Rates of Payment for Foster Care?

One commenter questioned why the Bureau used Title IV of the Social Security Act as the payment rate for foster care and did not either set a Bureau rate or allow tribes to set their own rate.

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. The Bureau has used this rate for many years and has found that it is the most appropriate rate to use for this service. This section was renamed and rewritten in the final rule in the form of a table for clarification purposes.

Section 20.502 Can Child Assistance Funds Be Used for Placement of Indian Children in Treatment Centers?

One commenter stated that the requirement of a written agreement to be approved by the Regional Director, should be changed to the local Bureau official for approval. Another commenter requested clarification that this service was out of the home. Another commenter requested deletion of the requirement that placements had to be in facilities licensed by the tribe or state. Another commenter requested deletion of the requirement that a written agreement be signed between the various funding sources to identify the services each will pay before the actual placement. Another commenter requested that child assistance be used for other services other than room and board.

Response: These recommendations were partially adopted. The approval by the Regional Director was changed to the Bureau line officer. The service provided in a treatment center is clearly a service that cannot be provided in the home. Treatment Center was revised to read residential care facilities in the final rule. Placements in licensed facilities insures a minimum level of service and was retained. Use of a written agreement specifying who is paying for specific services was retained as it is necessary to have a specific budget to work with because funds are limited. The Bureau retained the language that specifies use of funds for only room and board as the Bureau has limited funds and other agencies having primary service responsibility should be involved in payment for services.

Section 20.503 Can Child Assistance Funds Be Used for Indian Adoption Subsidies or Subsidized Guardianships?

One commenter suggested that the 2-year limit for adoption and guardianship subsidies should be eliminated and that the Regional Director approval be changed.

Response: This recommendation was adopted. The Bureau eliminated the 2-year limitation and changed the approval to the Bureau line officer. The redetermination for eligibility was clarified as being conducted on a yearly basis.

Section 20.504 What Eligibility Requirements Must Be Met for an Indian Adoption Subsidy or Subsidized Guardianship?

One commenter requested explanation as to why children must be under the age 18 to be eligible for adoption subsidy or subsidized guardianship. Another commenter questioned the eligibility requirement for children to have been in foster care previously to be eligible for adoption subsidy or subsidized guardianship. Another commenter stated that this section prevented placement of children on temporary basis without permanency planning. Another commenter asked what the special circumstances were in (a). This section was combined with § 20.503 in the final rule.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The requirement to be under the age of 18 (with regard to special circumstances as defined by tribal standards) and to have been in foster care previously to be eligible for adoption subsidy or subsidized guardianship was included to focus upon long-term cases which have the highest priority. The language in this section facilitates temporary placement if there is a need for this service. The tribes have flexibility to interpret special circumstances.

Section 20.505 What Is the Payment Standard for Adoption and Guardianship?

Some commenters stated that the payment standard should be decided by the tribes operating the programs. This section was combined with § 20.501 in the final rule.

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. The Bureau needs to establish the rate as this is a budgetary concern. The Assistant Secretary will establish the payment standard referred to in this section within 60 days after this rule is published in final.

Section 20.506 Can Homemaker Services Be Provided With Child Assistance?

One commenter stated that homemaker services should stay short term not to exceed 3 months. Another commenter requested that it not be limited to 3 months but language should be added to state it would be reviewed every 6 months. This section was renumbered as § 20.504 in the final rule.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. Limiting services to 3 months accurately conveys the intent of this service which is to keep it short term.

Section 20.507 What Services Are Provided Jointly With the Child Assistance Program?

One commenter requested that a written agreement signed among the various funding sources should be deleted. Another commenter requested that (b) protective services be explained in more detail. This section was renumbered as § 20.505 in the final rule.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The requirement for a written agreement was retained as this is an important planning and budgetary requirement which will clarify responsibilities before placement. Protective services were described in § 20.401 which was renumbered as §§ 20.402 and 20.403 and it was unnecessary to repeat them in this section.

Section 20.508 What Information Is Required in the Foster Care Case File?

One commenter suggested that this section be deleted as it was unnecessary. One commenter suggested the addition of language at the end of (d) if available and at the end (h) if applicable after Medicaid. Another commenter suggested a rewrite of the section because (e) which references a payment plan with parental agreement may not be applicable where parents do not agree to contribute financial support. This section was renumbered as § 20.506 in the final rule.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted because the information requirements are critical for a successful foster care placement and specifying them in regulations ensures that the dates will be provided. Even if a parent does not agree to contribute financial support, there should be a plan which involves their participation as they are not relieved of responsibility. The parents' cooperation is needed particularly if reunification is the ultimate goal.

Section 20.509 What Are The Requirements For Foster Care?

One commenter asked if the intent of this section was to require social services workers to enforce child support collection. Another commenter asked whether homemaker services could be used for handicapped children. Another commenter pointed out that in many instances there was a poor relationship between tribes and state courts. One commenter stated that background checks conducted on foster home providers were not legal. One commenter stated that (a) implied that the court had a role in selecting the placement rather than social services and recommended language deleting the reference to courts. Another commenter questioned the use of state standards of payment for necessary care in (e) and recommended establishing the rates at the local level. Another commenter suggested a problem in (f) in gaining parental agreement and recommended addition of the phrase “when possible.” This section was renumbered as § 20.507 in the final rule.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. The Bureau is not requiring social services workers to pursue child support enforcement; however, they are required to cooperate with other service delivery systems that have responsibility for enforcement of child support. Section 20.501 describes use of homemaker services for children which could include handicapped children but it is only short term in nature. Working relationships between tribes and states is not a subject that can be addressed in regulations. The Bureau retained the requirement of background checks as this is in compliance with part 63 and Public Law 101-630.

Section 20.510 How Is the Court Involved in Foster Care Placements?

One commenter stated that there was an inconsistency because § 20.508(i) stated that a court needed to be involved if a placement goes beyond 30 days and therefore the language in § 20.510 needed rewording because there were instances where the court may not be involved. This section was renumbered § 20.508(i) in the final rule.

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. The Bureau language did not need to be changed to clarify the intent because § 20.508(i) gives flexibility in those instances where a court may not be involved by stating the placement will be in accordance with tribal codes and standards authorized by a court of competent jurisdiction and is not in conflict with § 20.510.

Section 20.511 Should Permanency Plans Be Developed?

Some commenters stated that the requirement to have permanency planning developed within 6 months was not possible or realistic and suggested that it be changed to 12 months.

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. The Bureau retained the 6-month requirement as this is realistic and conveys that this should be a high priority.

Section 20.512 Can the Bureau/Tribal Contractors Make Indian Adoptive Placements?

No comments were received on this section.

Section 20.513 Should Interstate Compacts Be Used for the Placement of Children?

One commenter suggested changing “must” to “should.”

Response: This recommendation was adopted. The Bureau changed the wording.

Section 20.514 What Assistance Can the Courts Request From Social Services on Behalf of Children?

One commenter stated that this section conflicted with § 20.510.

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. The Bureau did not agree that there was a conflict between § 20.510 and § 20.514, because § 20.510 explains the courts authority in terms of expenditure of funds and § 20.514 explains the types of social services that can be requested by the courts.

Section 20.515 What Is Required for Case Management?

One commenter stated that in some instances there was not enough staff for a supervisor to complete case reviews every 90 days.

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. The Bureau feels that reviewing cases every 90 days is both important and reasonable.

Section 20.516 How Are Child Abuse and Neglect Cases To Be Handled?

One commenter suggested replacing “must” with the word “will” and also noted that there were insufficient funds to handle child abuse and neglect cases. One commenter questioned the requirement of child protection teams as their reading of Public Law 99-570 and Public Law 101-630 did not specify child protection teams.

Response: These recommendations were partially adopted. The Bureau replaced “must” with “will.” The lack of administrative funding cannot be addressed in the regulations. The Bureau has issued guidance on child protection teams for many years and there has never been any question raised about the legality of child protection teams, which are referenced under Pub. L. 99-570 and Pub. L. 101-630 to handle child protection issues. Therefore, the language was retained.

Subpart F—Administrative Procedures

Section 20.600 How Is an Application for Financial Assistance or Social Services Made?

One commenter stated that there was confusion as to whether an application was required to be in writing. One commenter stated that there was confusion between applications and referrals. Another commenter stated that language was needed to clarify that contractors should forward applications to the appropriate tribal staff.

Response: These recommendations were partially adopted. All applications must be in writing. The language should have stated that oral applications would need to be reduced to writing at a later date if an oral application was taken originally. Referrals are clearly for the purpose of making application so this language remained unchanged. The current regulations in place for the past 15 years have included reference to the Superintendent and there has never been confusion among tribes as to where applications must go when tribes operate the Social Service program. This particular language was retained. This section was rewritten in the final rule for clarification purposes.

Section 20.601 From Whom Is Eligibility Information Collected?

Some commenters stated that when there was a change in the recipient's circumstances which affected payment level that a process for overpayment should be described and the direct service providers should be able to refer this matter to administrative staff for follow up. One commenter stated that this section was in conflict with § 20.304 because it stated a recipient was required to immediately inform social services of any changes rather than within 30 days.

Response: These recommendations were partially adopted. The overpayment process is more appropriately addressed in internal procedures. The Bureau changed § 20.601 which was renumbered as § 20.602 to require the recipient to immediately inform the social services office of any change in status affecting eligibility or amount of assistance. This section was rewritten in the final rule for clarification purposes.

Section 20.602 How Is an Application Approved or Denied?

One commenter stated that the proper reference in this section was §§ 20.300 through 20.516 and also suggested the section should be rewritten to state that the Bureau is the approving or denying authority and that an additional section should be added for tribes to outline how they approve or deny an application. This section was renumbered as § 20.603 in the final rule.

Response: These recommendations were partially adopted. The Bureau changed the section reference number to add better clarity. However, the Bureau did not change the remainder of the section because there is no confusion as to tribes' responsibilities when they contract for the service.

Section 20.603 How Is an Applicant or Recipient Notified That Benefits or Services Are Denied?

One commenter noted that under (5) “not” had been deleted and thus allowing an appeal under part 2 when the intent was to make the decision final and not subject to appeal if there was no request for a hearing within 20 days of the date of the notice. Another commenter suggested an additional section for contractors and inclusion of language in the original section stating that this section applied to the Bureau only. This section was renumbered as § 20.604 in the final rule.

Response: These recommendations were partially adopted. The Bureau agreed that under (5) “not” was incorrectly deleted and this was corrected. Additional language was not needed for contractors.

Section 20.604 How Is an Incorrect Payment Adjusted or Recovered?

One commenter suggested an additional section for contractors and inclusion in the original section which specified that this section applied to the Bureau only. This section was renumbered as § 20.606 in the final rule.

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. A separate section for contractors was not added as it is not necessary because part 900 explains the responsibilities of contractors.

Section 20.605 What Happens When Applicants or Recipients Knowingly and Willfully Provide False, Fictitious, or Fraudulent Information?

No comments were received on this section. This section was renumbered as § 20.607 in the final rule and rewritten for clarification purposes.

Subpart G—Hearings and Appeals

Section 20.700 Can an Applicant or Recipient Appeal the Decision of a Bureau Official?

No comments were received on this section.

Section 20.701 Does an Applicant or Recipient Receive Financial Assistance while an Appeal is Pending?

One commenter stated that an applicant should not receive assistance if they have not been determined eligible for assistance.

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. The section conveys the intent in that financial assistance will continue while the Superintendent makes a final decision on an appeal which is pending. Recovery for overpayments was addressed in the section.

Section 20.702 When Is an Appeal Hearing Scheduled?

One commenter stated that the section should be rewritten to explain that the recipient has a right to request an extension of 10 days for the date of the hearing.

Response: This recommendation was not adopted. The Bureau did not make this change because this section does not guarantee an extension of 10 days for the hearing to the recipient nor was the section designed to provide such an extension.

Section 20.703 What Must the Written Notice of Hearing Include?

No comments were received on this section.

Section 20.704 Who Conducts the Hearing or Appeal From a Bureau Decision or Action and What Is the Process?

No comments were received on this section.

Section 20.705 Can an Applicant or Recipient Appeal a Tribal Decision?

One commenter stated that there should be a process for applicants or recipients to appeal tribal decisions. Another commenter stated that this section violated tribal sovereignty.

Response: These recommendations were not adopted. This process for appeals of a tribe's decisions should be an internal procedure which is specified in the tribe's own policy and procedure manual. This section was not changed because it clarifies the Bureau's role in terms of applicant or recipient appeals of tribal decisions.

Regulatory Planning and Review (E.O. 12866)

This document is not a significant rule and is not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866.

(1) This rule will not have an effect of $100 million or more on the economy. It will not adversely affect in a material way the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or state, local, or tribal governments or communities. Tribes have been operating this financial assistance program for 30 years and the amount of funding is dependent upon the local economy in terms of unemployment and extent of need for funds. Approximately 400 tribes receive some form of financial assistance yearly and the amount of funds varies according to caseload increases and decreases. The Bureau's total expenditure for social service programs is $94 million.

(2) This rule will not create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency.

(3) This rule does not alter the budgetary effects of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights or obligations of their recipients. It establishes procedures for various social services programs, but does not alter the amounts that will be awarded.

(4) This rule does not raise novel legal or policy issues.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) specifically excludes Indian tribes from its coverage.

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)

This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule:

(a) Does not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more. The financial assistance funds available total $94 million and are divided up between 400 Indian communities based upon need.

(b) Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, federal, state, or local government agencies, or geographic regions. This rule provides guidance for a welfare benefit program and will not affect payment levels of eligible clients nor cause increases or decreases in existing caseloads or total expenditures.

(c) Does not have significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. This program is a welfare benefit program and does not affect local enterprises.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on state, local, or tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per year. The rule does not have a significant or unique effect on state, local, or tribal governments or the private sector. A statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (1 U.S.C. 1531, et seq.) is not required.

Takings (E.O. 12630)

In accordance with Executive Order 12630, the rule does not have significant takings implications. A takings implication assessment is not required.

Federalism (E.O. 13132)

In accordance with Executive Order 13132 this rule does not have significant Federalism effects. Consultation was not conducted with state and local officials because the rule does not affect state and local entities but does affect tribal communities. Consultation was conducted with tribal officials at three separate locations and their recommendations were considered in the preparation of the final rule.

Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)

In accordance with Executive Order 12988, the Office of the Solicitor has determined that this rule does not unduly burden the judicial system and meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order.

Paperwork Reduction Act

This regulation requires an information collection from 10 or more parties and a submission under the Paperwork Reduction Act is required. An OMB Form 83-I and an information collection packet were reviewed by the Department and were sent to OMB for approval on March 31, 1999. Subsequently, OMB provided approval on June 8, 1999, for form number OMB 1076-0017 for the Bureau Financial and Social Services Program.

The Bureau has reviewed the information needed and reduced the amount of information being collected. The information collection takes 15 minutes for 200,000 respondents for a burden of 50,000 hours. The information collection is used to make decisions within the framework of the financial assistance program, such as determining eligibility, ensuring uniformity of services, and maintaining current records for audit purposes. The information collection is required to obtain or retain a benefit. Information covered by the Privacy Act will be kept confidential as required by regulation. Please note that an agency may not collect or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

National Environmental Policy Act

This rule does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. A detailed statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 is not required.

List of Subjects in 25 CFR Part 20

• Administrative practice and procedures
• Child welfare
• Indians—social welfare
• Public assistance programs

For the reasons set out in the preamble, we are revising part 20 in chapter I of title 25 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows.

PART 20—FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE AND SOCIAL SERVICES PROGRAMS

Authority: 25 U.S.C. 13; Pub. L. 93-638; Pub. L. 98-473; Pub. L. 102-477; Pub. L. 104-193; Pub. L. 105-83.

Subpart A—Definitions, Purpose and Policy

Subpart B—Welfare Reform

Subpart C—Direct Assistance

Eligibility for Direct Assistance

Subpart D—Services to Children, Elderly, and Families

Subpart E—Child Assistance

Subpart F—Administrative Procedures

Subpart G—Hearings and Appeals