Filing Window for New Rural Digital Low Power Television and TV Translator Applicants Displaced by Incentive Auction and Station Repack December 2, 2019 to January 31, 2020

Download PDF
Federal RegisterDec 27, 2019
84 Fed. Reg. 71411 (Dec. 27, 2019)

AGENCY:

Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION:

Notice.

SUMMARY:

The Media Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission announces a window filing opportunity for pending new digital low power and TV translator stations (LPTV/translator stations) displaced by the Incentive Auction and station repack to amend their applications to specify a new channel between 2 to 36 (in core channels).

DATES:

The window will open December 2, 2019 and close on January 31, 2020 at 11:59 p.m. ET.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Shaun Maher, Video Division, Media Bureau, Federal Communications Commission, Shaun.Maher@fcc.gov, (202) 418-2324.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

In 2009, the Media Bureau began accepting applications for new rural digital LPTV/translator stations on a limited basis and then later froze those filings. The Media Bureau suspended processing of these applications due to the possibility that they could be displaced by the forthcoming Incentive Auction and repacking process. With the completion of the Incentive Auction and the progress made in the post-Incentive Auction transition, it is appropriate to give these applicants an opportunity to amend their applications to specify a new digital in core channel.

To be eligible to file in this window, the applicant must have a pending application for new digital LPTV/translator station that was displaced by the Incentive Auction and repacking process. In order to be considered “displaced” for purposes of filing in this window, an LPTV/translator applicant must: (1) Be subject to displacement by a full power or Class A television station on the repacked television band (channels 2-36) as a result of the Incentive Auction and repacking process, (2) have proposed a frequency repurposed for new, flexible use by a 600 MHz Band wireless licensee, or (3) have proposed a frequency that will serve as part of the 600 MHz Band guard bands (which includes the duplex gap).

In addition to specifying a new in core digital channel, applicants may modify their technical specifications provided such changes do not result in a change in transmitter site of more than 48 kilometers from the reference coordinates specified in their original application. To preserve the “rural” filing restriction in the original 2009 window, amended facilities must specify transmitting antenna site coordinates (geographic latitude and longitude) located more than 121 kilometers (75 miles) from the reference coordinates of the cities listed in Appendix A of the Public Notice. The proposed facilities may not cause interference to the predicted service of licenses and valid construction permits for full power television, Class A television and LPTV/translator stations nor the predicted service of any previously-filed application for any of these services. Eligible applicants may file an amendment to their pending application and such filing will be treated as a minor amendment provided it complies with these restrictions. There is no fee for filing this amendment.

All amendments submitted during the window will be considered filed on the last day of the window. Mutually exclusive (MX) applicants will be given an opportunity to resolve their MX through settlement or engineering amendment that may be submitted during a settlement window to be announced by the Media Bureau by separate public notice. If two or more applications remain MX with one another after the close of the settlement window, the applications will be subject to the Commission's competitive bidding rules.

Applications that are not amended to specify an in core channel during this window will be subsequently dismissed.

For additional information or questions, please contact Mark Colombo (technical), Mark.Colombo@fcc.gov, (202) 418-7611 or Shaun Maher (legal), Shaun.Maher@fcc.gov, (202) 418-2324 of the Video Division, Media Bureau.

Barbara Kreisman,

Chief, Video Division, Media Bureau.

APPENDIX A

Amendments filed during the window to allow applicants for new digital low power television and television translator stations on channels 37 to 51 (out of core channels) to specify a channel between 2 and 36 (in core channels) may not propose facilities located within 121 kilometers (75 miles) of the reference coordinates listed below for the following cities. Source of cities: January 1, 2008 Nielsen Media Research Estimates. Source of coordinates: Section 76.53 of the Commission's Rules.

DMA Ranking Market North latitude West longitude
 1. New York City, New York 40-45-06 073-59-39
 2. Los Angeles, California 34-03-15 118-14-28
 3. Chicago, Illinois 41-52-28 87-38-22
 4. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 39-56-58 75-9-21
 5. Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas 32-47-09 096-47-37
 6. San Francisco, California 37-46-39 122-24-40
 7. Boston, Massachusetts 42-21-24 71-3-25
 8. Atlanta, Georgia 33-45-10 84-23-37
 9. Washington, District of Columbia 38-53-51 77-0-33  
10. Houston, Texas 29-45-26 95-21-37
11. Detroit, Michigan 42-19-48 83-2-57
12. Phoenix, Arizona 33-27-12 112-4-28
13. Tampa, Florida 27-56-58 82-27-26
14. Seattle, Washington 47-36-32 122-20-12
15. Minneapolis, Minnesota 44-58-57 93-15-43
16. Miami, Florida 25-46-37 80-11-32
17. Cleveland, Ohio 41-29-51 81-41-50
18. Denver, Colorado 39-44-58 104-59-22
19. Orlando, Florida 28-32-42 81-22-38
20. Sacramento, California 38-34-57 122-23-34
21. St. Louis, Missouri 38-37-45 90-12-22
22. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 40-26-19 80-0-0
23. Portland, Oregon 45-31-6 122-40-35
24. Baltimore, Maryland 39-17-26 76-36-45
25. Charlotte, North Carolina 35-13-44 80-50-45
26. Indianapolis, Indiana 39-46-7 86-9-46
27. San Diego, California 32-42-53 117-9-21
28. Raleigh, North Carolina 35-46-38 78-38-21
29. Hartford, Connecticut 41-46-12 72-40-49
30. Nashville, Tennessee 36-9-33 86-46-55
31. Kansas City, Missouri 39-4-56 94-35-20
32. Columbus, Ohio 39-57-47 83-0-17
33. Cincinnati, Ohio 39-6-7 84-30-35
34. Milwaukee, Wisconsin 43-2-19 87-54-15
35. Salt Lake City, Utah 40-45-23 111-51-26
36. Greenville, South Carolina 34-50-50 82-24-1
37. San Antonio, Texas 29-25-37 98-29-6
38. West Palm Beach, Florida 26-42-36 80-3-5
39. Grand Rapids, Michigan 42-58-3 85-40-13
40. Birmingham, Alabama 33-31-1 86-48-36
41. Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 40-15-43 76-52-59
42. Norfolk, Virginia 36-51-10 76-17-21
43. Las Vegas, Nevada 36-10-20 115-8-37
44. Albuquerque, New Mexico 35-5-1 106-39-5
45. Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 35-28-26 97-31-4
46. Greensboro, North Carolina 36-4-17 79-47-25
47. Memphis, Tennessee 35-8-46 90-3-13
48. Louisville, Kentucky 38-14-47 85-45-49
49. Jacksonville, Florida 30-19-44 81-39-42
50. Buffalo, New York 42-52-52 78-52-21
51. Austin, Texas 30-16-9 97-44-37
52. Providence, Rhode Island 41-49-32 71-24-41
53. New Orleans, Louisiana 29-56-53 90-4-10
54. Scranton, Pennsylvania 41-24-32 75-39-46
55. Fresno, California 36-44-12 119-47-11
56. Albany, New York 42-39-1 73-45-1
57. Little Rock, Arkansas 34-44-52 92-16-37
58. Knoxville, Tennessee 35-57-39 83-55-7
59. Richmond, Virginia 37-32-15 77-26-9
60. Tulsa, Oklahoma 36-9-12 95-59-34
61. Mobile, Alabama 30-41-36 88-2-33
62. Dayton, Ohio 39-45-32 84-11-43
63. Fort Myers, Florida 26-38-42 81-52-6
64. Lexington, Kentucky 38-2-50 84-29-46
65. Huntington, West Virginia 38-25-12 82-26-33
66. Flint, Michigan 43-0-50 83-41-33
67. Roanoke, Virginia 37-16-13 79-56-44
68. Tucson, Arizona 32-13-15 110-58-8
69. Wichita, Kansas 37-41-30 97-20-16
70. Green Bay, Wisconsin 44-30-48 88-0-50
71. Des Moines, Iowa 41-35-14 93-37-0
72. Toledo, Ohio 41-39-14 83-32-39
73. Honolulu, Hawaii 21-18-36 157-51-48
74. Springfield, Missouri 37-13-3 93-17-32
75. Omaha, Nebraska 41-15-42 95-56-14
76. Portland, Maine 43-39-33 70-15-19
77. Spokane, Washington 47-39-32 117-25-33
78. Rochester, New York 43-9-41 77-36-21
79. Paducah, Kentucky 37-5-13 88-35-56
80. Syracuse, New York 43-3-4 76-9-14
81. Columbia, South Carolina 34-0-2 81-2-0
82. Shreveport, Louisiana 32-30-46 93-44-58
83. Huntsville, Alabama 34-44-18 86-35-19
84. Champaign, Illinois 40-7-5 88-14-48
85. Madison, Wisconsin 43-4-23 89-22-55
86. Chattanooga, Tennessee 35-2-41 85-18-32
87. Cedar Rapids, Iowa 41-58-48 91-39-48
88. Harlingen, Texas 26-11-29 97-41-35
89. South Bend, Indiana 43-40-33 86-15-1
90. Jackson, Mississippi 32-17-56 90-11-6
91. Johnson City, Tennessee 36-19-4 82-20-56
92. Burlington, Vermont/Plattsburgh, New York 44-28-34 73-12-46
93. Colorado Springs, Colorado 38-50-7 104-49-16
94. Baton Rouge, Louisiana 30-26-58 91-11-0
95. Waco, Texas 31-33-12 97-8-0
96. Davenport, Iowa 41-31-24 90-34-21
97. Savannah, Georgia 32-4-42 81-5-37
98. El Paso, Texas 31-45-36 106-29-21
99. Johnstown, Pennsylvania 40-19-35 78-55-3
100. Charleston, South Carolina 32-46-35 79-55-53

[FR Doc. 2019-27941 Filed 12-26-19; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6712-01-P