Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA): Travel Promotion Fee and Fee for Use of the System

AGENCY:

U.S. Customs and Border Protection, DHS.

ACTION:

Interim final rule; solicitation of comments.

SUMMARY:

Nonimmigrant aliens who wish to enter the United States under the Visa Waiver Program at air or sea ports of entry must obtain a travel authorization electronically through the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) from U.S. Customs and Border Protection prior to departing for the United States. This rule requires ESTA applicants to pay a congressionally mandated fee of $14.00, which is the sum of two amounts: a $10 travel promotion fee for an approved ESTA statutorily set by the Travel Promotion Act and a $4.00 operational fee for the use of ESTA as set by the Secretary of Homeland Security to ensure recovery of the full costs of providing and administering the ESTA system.

DATES:

This interim final rule is effective on September 8, 2010. Comments must be received on or before October 8, 2010.

ADDRESSES:

Please submit comments, identified by docket number, by one of the following methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments via docket number USCBP-2010-xxxx.
• Mail: Border Security Regulations Branch, Office of International Trade, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW. (Mint Annex), Washington, DC 20229.
• Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number for this rulemaking. All comments will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov,, including any personal information provided.
• Docket: For access to the docket to read background material or comments, go to http://www.regulations.gov. Comments submitted will be available for public inspection in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) and 19 CFR 103.11(b) on normal business days between the hours of 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. at the Border Security Regulations Branch, Office of International Trade, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, 799 9th Street, NW., 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20229. Arrangements to inspect submitted comments should be made in advance by calling Mr. Joseph Clark at (202) 325-0118.
• For additional information on ESTA, visit the Web site: http://www.cbp.gov/esta.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Suzanne Shepherd, Office of Field Operations, CBP.ESTA@dhs.gov or (202)-344-2073.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

I. Public Comments

II. Background

A. Travel Promotion Act of 2009

B. Operational Fee Amount

C. Fee Collection

III. Statutory and Regulatory Requirements

A. Administrative Procedure Act

B. Executive Order 12866

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

E. Executive Order 13132

F. Executive Order 12988 Civil Justice Reform

G. Paperwork Reduction Act

H. Privacy Interests

List of Subjects

Amendments to the Regulations

I. Public Comments

Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on all aspects of this interim final rule, including the amount of the fee. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) also invites comments on the economic, environmental or federalism effects of the rule, as well as comments related to the Paperwork Reduction Act. We urge commenters to explain the reason for any recommended change, and include data, information, or authorities that support such recommended change.

II. Background

Pursuant to section 217 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1187, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State, may designate certain qualifying countries as Visa Waiver Program (VWP) countries. Eligible travelers who are nationals of VWP countries are not required to obtain a visa to travel to the United States. Other nonimmigrant alien travelers generally must obtain a visa from a U.S. embassy or consulate and undergo an interview by consular officials overseas, in advance of travel to the United States.

On August 3, 2007, the President signed into law the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007 (9/11 Act), Public Law 110-53. Section 711 of the 9/11 Act required that the Secretary of Homeland Security (the Secretary), in consultation with the Secretary of State, develop and implement a fully automated electronic travel authorization system to collect biographical and other information as the Secretary determines necessary to evaluate, in advance of travel, the eligibility of the applicant to travel to the United States under the VWP, and whether such travel poses a law enforcement or security risk. On June 9, 2008, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published an interim final rule (IFR) in the Federal Register (73 FR 32440) announcing the creation of the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) program for aliens traveling to the United States by air or sea under the VWP. See 8 CFR 217.5.

The ESTA system now requires VWP travelers arriving in the United States by air or sea to provide certain biographical and other information electronically to CBP in advance of travel so that CBP can determine eligibility for travel to the United States under the VWP. Each ESTA travel authorization generally is valid for two years. Implementation of ESTA as a mandatory requirement initially was delayed to allow carriers and the public to become ESTA-compliant. Since January 12, 2009, all nonimmigrant aliens traveling to the United States under the VWP on an air or sea carrier must obtain travel authorization from the ESTA Web site. 73 FR 67354.

Travel authorization under ESTA allows an alien from a VWP country to travel to the United States, however, it does not serve as a determination of admissibility to the United States. If an alien's travel authorization application is denied, the alien may still seek to obtain a visa to travel to the United States through a U.S. embassy or consulate or may reapply through the ESTA Web site at a later date if circumstances change or an error was made during the application process.

Although the 9/11 Act authorized the Secretary to charge a fee for ESTA to recover the costs of providing and administering the System, the ESTA IFR did not establish a fee. At the time the IFR was issued, DHS was focused on the successful development and deployment of the ESTA system to collect the relevant traveler data and to properly vet applicants. DHS wanted to ensure the efficient operation and maintenance of the ESTA system before establishing an operational fee to recoup the costs of processing ESTA applications and vetting individual applicants. On January 12, 2009, when the ESTA system became mandatory, DHS began evaluating the costs associated with operating and maintaining the system in order to establish a fee. DHS has completed this evaluation and a detailed fee analysis explaining how the ESTA operational fee is calculated and the methodology used can found in the public docket for this rule at http://www.regulations.gov.

A. Travel Promotion Act of 2009

On March 4, 2010, the United States Capitol Police Administrative Technical Corrections Act of 2009, Public Law 111-145 was enacted. The Travel Promotion Act of 2009 (TPA), which was contained in section 9, mandates that the Secretary establish a fee for the use of the ESTA system and begin assessing and collecting that fee no later than 6 months after enactment of the TPA. See section 217(h)(3)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1187(h)(3)(B). Accordingly, to comply with the TPA, the Secretary is required to assess and collect the fee by September 4, 2010.

The TPA expressly provides that the required initial ESTA fee shall consist of the sum of “$10 per travel authorization” (travel promotion fee) plus “an amount that will at least ensure recovery of the full costs of providing and administering the System, as determined by the Secretary” (operational fee). The TPA provides that the $10 per travel authorization is to be credited to the Travel Promotion Fund established by the TPA and is to be used by the Corporation for Travel Promotion, also established by the TPA, to promote international travel to the United States. The operational fee is to be transferred to the general fund of the Treasury and made available to pay the costs incurred to administer ESTA. Under the TPA, the travel promotion fee has a sunset provision and the Secretary is authorized to collect this fee only through September 30, 2015. The operational fee, in contrast, does not include a sunset provision but will be reassessed on a regular basis to ensure it is set at a level to fully recover ESTA operating costs.

Based on the TPA, this rule establishes an initial ESTA fee that consists of the sum of “$10 per travel authorization” (travel promotion fee) plus “an amount that will at least ensure recovery of the full costs of providing and administering the [ESTA] System, as determined by the Secretary” (operational fee) no later than 6 months after enactment of the TPA. See 8 U.S.C. 1187(h)(3)(B)(i).

B. Operational Fee Amount

DHS has determined that a $4.00 fee is necessary to ensure recovery of the full costs of providing and administering the system. This fee takes into account the costs to develop, implement, maintain, and make any necessary updates to the ESTA system. A full explanation of the methodology used to determine the $4.00 operational ESTA fee is contained in the ESTA Fee Analysis (Explanation of the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) Fee, April 2010), which can be found in the public docket for this rulemaking at http://www.regulations.gov. A brief summary of the methodology is provided below.

The following methodology was employed to determine the $4.00 ESTA fee for applications through FY 2015:

1. Determine the costs associated with ESTA—initial investment, direct, and indirect costs associated with ESTA development, operation, and maintenance. Costs are adjusted upward annually to account for inflation.

2. Estimate the total number of ESTA applicants—total VWP travelers adjusted downward to account for travelers who make multiple trips during the 2-year period each ESTA is valid. Travelers will remit the ESTA fee upon initial application; they need not pay the fee each time they visit the United States during the authorization period.

3. Determine the fee per applicant by dividing the total costs, plus an operating carryover amount, by the number of projected ESTA applicants. The carryover is included to assure there is sufficient funding in the event there is an unforeseen drop in ESTA applicants.

The estimated costs associated with ESTA from FY 2008 through FY 2015 are $312 million. Costs in FY 2008 and FY 2009 totaled approximately $39.5 million. From FY 2010 through FY 2015, costs include the administration, staffing, and operation of the system (plus overhead costs), as well as information technology for other CBP and non-CBP systems that permit information sharing and services that are necessary for ESTA to operate effectively. An additional carryover sum of $12.5 million, equal to one fiscal quarter of operating costs, is added to the total FY 2008 through FY 2015 costs as a contingency in case travel volumes fall below expected levels.

Using traveler projection data from the Department of Commerce, Office of Travel and Tourism Industries, CBP estimated the future number of VWP travelers for FY 2011 through FY 2015. CBP then adjusted that estimate to account for the estimated number of “repeat travelers” during that period. These repeat travelers would, in most cases, be required to apply for a travel authorization only once over a 2-year period, not each time they traveled to the United States. Using data from CBP's Advance Passenger Information System (APIS), CBP calculated an actual percentage of past repeat travelers, which was then applied as an estimated percentage of “repeat travelers” during the period from FY 2011 through FY 2015. With this adjustment for repeat travelers, the cumulative total of ESTA applicants FY 2011 through FY 2015 is an estimated 86 million travelers.

The $4.00 fee was determined by dividing the total estimated costs ($312 million in costs + $12.5 million for a carryover reserve) by the total ESTA applicants (86 million) through FY 2015, then rounding up to the nearest whole dollar amount. Exhibit 1 shows the calculation of the fee.

Any changes to the $4.00 ESTA operational fee will be accomplished through a future rulemaking consistent with the Administrative Procedure Act.

C. Fee Collection

During the ESTA application process, the ESTA user will be directed to provide credit card information to pay the non-refundable $4.00 operational fee and authorize the $10 travel promotion fee through the Federal Government's online payment system, Pay.gov. The $10 travel promotion fee will be charged to the applicant's credit card only when the ESTA is granted. Pay.gov is a system by which parties can make secure electronic payments to many Federal Government agencies. The Pay.gov Web site is available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week (holidays included) for users to submit payments.

The operational fee discussed in this notice is for processing the application and vetting the individual applicant. The operational fee is nonrefundable if a traveler's application is denied. In the event that an ESTA application is denied, the traveler may apply for a visa through a U.S. embassy or consulate or may reapply through the ESTA Web site at a later date if circumstances change or an error was made during the ESTA application process. Each ESTA applicant will incur the $4.00 operational fee when he or she submits an ESTA application. By contrast, an applicant will incur the $10 travel promotion fee only if he or she receives travel authorization.

VWP travelers with a valid travel authorization will be able to update and/or correct certain information provided on the ESTA application (such as the destination address in the United States) without having to pay another operational or travel promotion fee. However, as provided in the ESTA IFR, certain events, such as the issuance of a new passport, will require the VWP traveler to apply for a new travel authorization through ESTA. In that case, the traveler would be required to pay the operational fee as part of the new application process. Travelers receiving a new authorization before September 30, 2015 would also be required to pay the $10 travel promotion fee. Detailed instructions are available on the ESTA Web site regarding how to make ESTA updates and corrections and when a new travel authorization is required.

III. Statutory and Regulatory Requirements

A. Administrative Procedure Act

The APA generally requires agencies to publish a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register (5 U.S.C. 553(b)) and provide interested persons the opportunity to submit comments (5 U.S.C. 553(c)). However, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), a notice of proposed rulemaking is not required when the agency determines, for good cause, that notice and public participation is impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.

In this case, the TPA requires the Secretary of Homeland Security to begin assessing and collecting a fee equal to the sum of the travel promotion fee ($10) and the operational fee ($4.00) within 6 months of the TPA's enactment, which is September 4, 2010. See 8 U.S.C. 1187 (h)(3)(B)(i). The $10 travel promotion fee is intended to fund the Corporation for Travel Promotion (Corporation) and, once collected, the $10 travel promotion fees are to be made available by the Secretary of the Treasury to the Corporation for start-up expenses. Accordingly, the TPA requires DHS to be able to collect the ESTA fees to fund the Corporation. If DHS is unable to collect the ESTA fee, the Secretary of the Treasury would be unable to appropriate funding to cover the Corporation's initial expenses and activities. Moreover, given the limited duration of the travel promotion fee, which expires on September 30, 2015, it seems likely that Congress intended that the ESTA fee would be collected as soon as possible, but no later than six months from enactment of the TPA, which is September 4, 2010.

Considering the TPA's time constraints, implementing the new ESTA fees through notice and comment rulemaking process would prevent the Corporation from promptly receiving the funds necessary to serve its function of promoting tourism to the United States. As such, the statutory timeline imposed by the TPA to collect the sum of the travel promotion fee and the operational fee by September 4, 2010, when coupled with the sunset provision for the travel promotion fee, makes it impracticable for DHS to engage in the notice and comment rulemaking process. This IFR provides the mechanism through which DHS is able to assess and collect the ESTA fees in a manner consistent with the statutory provisions.

In sum, providing the public the opportunity to comment on these regulations prior to implementation would hamper the ability of DHS to collect the necessary fees as required under the TPA by September 4, 2010. Accordingly, DHS has determined that there is good cause to publish this rule without prior public notice and comment procedures. The Department, however, is interested in obtaining public comments on this interim final rule prior to the issuance of a final rule. Therefore, DHS is providing the public with the opportunity to comment after publication of this interim final rule. All comments received will become a matter of the public record.

B. Executive Order 12866

Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review; September 30, 1993) requires Federal agencies to conduct economic analyses of significant regulatory actions as a means to improve regulatory decision-making. Significant regulatory actions include those that may “(1) [h]ave an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local or tribal governments or communities; (2) [c]reate a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) [m]aterially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) [r]aise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in this Executive Order.” This rule is a significant regulatory action because the annual effect on the economy is $100 million or more in any one year. The annualized cost to applicants, primarily in the form of transfers from foreign citizens to the U.S. government, is estimated between $152 million and $258 million. As a result, this rule has been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866. The following summary presents the costs to applicants and benefits of the rule.

OMB Circular A-4 states the following with regard to the scope of Federal regulatory assessments: “Your analysis should focus on benefits and costs that accrue to citizens and residents of the United States. Where you choose to evaluate a regulation that is likely to have effects beyond the borders of the United States, these effects should be reported separately.” Additionally, Circular A-4 states: “You should not include transfers in the estimates of the benefits and costs of a regulation. Instead, address them in a separate discussion of the regulation's distributional effects.” CBP notes that the costs estimated in this analysis are primarily transfers, in the form of fees, from foreign visitors to the U.S. government. As described in more detail below, CBP has also estimated a charge for currency conversion that ESTA users will incur when they make their fee payments in pay.gov. These currency conversion costs are not transfers, but they are incurred by foreign travelers and are paid to foreign financial institutions. Thus, the costs to applicants presented in this section are transfers or costs incurred by foreign entities.

To determine the total cost to applicants of ESTA, CBP used the population of travelers identified in the analysis for the ESTA IFR. For that analysis, CBP developed four methods to predict ESTA-affected travelers to the United States over the next 10 years using information available from the Department of Commerce, Office of Travel and Tourism Industries (OTTI), documenting historic travel levels and future projections. Method 1 employs the travel-projection percentages provided by OTTI and extrapolates them to the end of the period of analysis (OTTI projects travel only through 2013; CBP calculates a simple extrapolation to 2020). Method 2 (modified OTTI projections) presents a more pessimistic outlook on travel: all projected percentages from Method 1 are reduced by 2 percent throughout the period of analysis. Methods 3 and 4 incorporate periodic downturns (one late in the period; one early), which are prevalent, though not necessarily predictable, in international travel. CBP used Method 1 for the fee calculation because it takes into account the most recent OTTI estimate, accounts for the 2008 downturn in air travel, and it is a midrange estimate compared to the other methods. The other methods are presented here for further information.

Because a travel authorization obtained through ESTA generally is valid for 2 years, CBP adjusted the populations in accordance with the ESTA Fee Analysis to reflect only those travelers who will be required to apply for authorization in any given year. For the purposes of this analysis and to make the calculations more tractable, CBP assumed the fee will be charged beginning in January 2011. Exhibit 2 compares the estimated number of travelers and the estimated number of ESTA applicants (“Applicants”) per year.

Costs to Travelers

CBP determined that the ESTA operational fee will be $4.00 per application. The methodology and calculations used to determine this fee can be found in the ESTA Fee Analysis (Explanation of the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA) Fee, April 2010). The TPA also requires a $10 travel promotion fee to be charged through ESTA that will be credited to the Travel Promotion Fund established by the TPA and is to be used by the Corporation for Travel Promotion, also established by the TPA, to promote international travel to the United States. Per the legislation, this fee will be effective through September 30, 2015.

In addition to the ESTA operational and travel promotion fees, many credit card issuers charge a fee for foreign currency transactions, which is generally a percentage of the total transaction amount. Because the ESTA fees must be paid by credit card in U.S. dollars and not local currency, travelers from VWP countries will likely incur a transaction fee. For this analysis, CBP assumes all travelers will incur a transaction fee, whether they apply using the ESTA website or are registered by a carrier or travel agent who will then pass the fee on to the traveler. CBP calculated a weighted average of foreign currency transaction fees based on market share in order to take into account not only the fee charged by each issuer, but the volume of purchases made using the cards of each issuer.

When the average foreign currency transaction fee of 2.7 percent is applied to the ESTA fees, the total charge will be $14.37. Exhibit 3 displays the total fees, including those charged by the credit card companies, for visitors from each country in 2011, the first full year CBP estimates that the fee will be charged. These totals are based on the populations used by CBP to calculate the fee and only reflect unique travelers who would be required to apply in 2011.

CBP next totaled these costs to applicants over the next 10 years at a 3 and 7 percent discount rate, per guidance provided in OMB Circular A-4. Total present value of the costs to applicants over the period of analysis could total $1.2 billion to $2.2 billion. Annualized costs to applicants are estimated at $152 million to $258 million. Method 1 was the method used to estimate the total costs and transfers due to the fee and is our primary estimate. Again, CBP notes that the bulk of these costs to applicants are transfers from foreign travelers to the U.S. government. See Exhibit 4.

Travelers using ESTA will incur costs in addition to the fee, including the time burden of applying for authorization and the time burden and cost to obtain a visa if authorization is denied. These costs were already addressed in the Regulatory Assessment for the June 2008 ESTA IFR and should not be considered here in order to avoid double counting these costs.

Change in Travel Demand

While the ESTA operational and travel promotion fees are very low relative to the overall costs of international travel, it is still possible that they could cause a reduction in the number of travelers coming to the United States from VWP countries. For this reason, CBP uses an “elasticity of demand” for long-haul international leisure and long-haul international business trips available from the published travel literature to analyze the impact of the change in cost (out-of-pocket expenses) for travelers using ESTA. Using an elasticity of demand allows CBP to get a sense of potential changes in the number of travelers in response to a change in the cost of a trip. Elasticities should not be viewed as the definitive level that demand could decrease due to an increase in travel price. In reality, a relatively minimal charge of $14.37 is much more likely to reduce the amount of money a traveler spends on other portions of the trip than to cause a traveler to cancel the trip altogether.

Because the elasticity of demand differs for business and leisure travelers, we first identify the portion of travel to the United States from VWP countries that can be assigned to those purposes using air traveler survey data from OTTI. CBP then uses OTTI data to identify the average cost per VWP traveler for a flight to the United States. Airfare costs vary by purpose of travel, but range from an average $1,406 per flight for a leisure traveler on vacation to $2,687 per flight for a business traveler.

To calculate the percent change in the average cost per flight, CBP divided the amount of the total charges by the original average cost per flight. CBP then multiplied the resulting percent increase by the elasticity of demand for air travel estimated in a study by the Canadian Department of Finance, -0.265 for long-haul international business travel and -1.040 for long-haul international leisure travel, to calculate the expected percent decrease in passenger volume. Exhibit 5 shows the total estimated number of passengers that could potentially be lost for each of the four population projections. While the impact varies for different categories of travelers, CBP estimates that up to 0.85 percent of travelers could be lost in a given year.

It is important to recognize, however, the positive impacts that the Travel Promotion Fund could have on international travelers to the United States. CBP is not able to estimate or project these impacts with any degree of confidence because the program and fund are not yet in place and the details of the administration of the fund to promote travel is currently unknown. Consequently, this analysis is not making specific projections about the overall net increase or decrease increase in travel due to the Travel Promotion Act.

Because there are many unknown variables in this analysis, there are potential costs that CBP cannot quantify with any degree of confidence. Costs that are important to consider, but that CBP has not quantified include potential decreases in visitor spending, and possible reciprocity by VWP countries (where these countries could develop ESTA-like systems and charge U.S. VWP travelers for applications of admissibility).

Benefits of the Regulation

This rule allows CBP to comply with the TPA's express mandate that the Secretary establish a fee for the use of the ESTA system and also establish a $10 travel promotion fee. The benefits of ESTA include enhanced security, cost savings associated with advanced determination of inadmissibility, and costs forgone by travelers, such as visa fees. These are discussed in the ESTA IFR Regulatory Assessment and are not considered here to avoid double-counting.

As noted above, the United States travel and tourism may benefit from increased international travelers based on promotion efforts made possible by the Travel Promotion Fund.

A-4 Accounting Statement

Note that the transfers listed in the A-4 Accounting Statement below are only for the ESTA fees ($14.00), and do not include the currency conversion charge ($0.37). This $0.37 charge is paid by foreign entities to foreign entities and is not included in this accounting statement of impacts to the U.S. economy.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 603(a)), as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement and Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA), requires an agency to prepare and make available to the public a regulatory flexibility analysis that describes the effect of a proposed rule on small entities (i.e., small businesses, small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions) when the agency is required to publish a general notice of proposed rulemaking for any proposed rule.

Since a general notice of proposed rulemaking is not necessary, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required. Nonetheless, DHS has considered the impact of this rule on small entities. This rule directly regulates individuals, and individuals are not considered small entities. Some small entities may be indirectly impacted to the extent that business travelers work for small businesses. However, the combined charge (the ESTA fees and the credit card transaction fee) of $14.37 is only 0.3 percent of the average cost of a business trip as estimated by OTTI ($5,231). Therefore, CBP certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995

This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the U.S. private sector, of $100 million (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.

E. Executive Order 13132

The rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of Executive Order 13132, DHS has determined that this interim final rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement.

F. Executive Order 12988 Civil Justice Reform

This rule meets the applicable standards set forth in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988.

G. Paperwork Reduction Act

An agency may not conduct, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the collection of information displays a valid control number assigned by OMB. These regulations are being issued without prior public notice and comment procedures pursuant to the APA, as described above. For this reason, CBP obtained temporary, emergency approval from OMB, in accordance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507) for the portion of OMB clearance 1651-0111 that was affected by this rule. CBP will solicit public comments when CBP submits a request for permanent OMB approval. The estimated burden hours related to ESTA for OMB Control Number 1651-0111 are as follows:

Estimated Number of Respondents: 18,900,000.

Estimated Time per Response: 15 minutes (0.25 hours).

Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 4,725,000 hours.

The burden hours in this collection have been updated to reflect new traveler levels predicted in 2011. Additionally, a portion of these travelers is new ESTA applicants, while a portion is repeat travelers. Only the new applicants or applicants whose authorization has expired will be required to pay the new fees. As noted above, approximately 16 million applicants will need to pay the fee annually (Method 1), for a total cost of $230 million. This is based on the average estimated number of respondents paying the combined charge (the ESTA fees and the credit card transaction fee) annually (16,000,000) × $14.37 = $229,920,000.

H. Privacy Interests

DHS published an ESTA Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) for the Interim Final Rule announcing ESTA on June 9, 2008. Additionally, at that time, DHS prepared a separate System of Record Notice (SORN) which was published in conjunction with the IFR on June 9, 2008. DHS has updated the ESTA PIA and SORN and both are available for viewing on CBP's Web site at http://www.foia.cbp.gov/.

List of Subjects in 8 CFR Part 217

• Air carriers
• Aliens
• Maritime carriers
• Passports and visas

Amendments to Regulations

For the reasons stated in the preamble, DHS is amending part 217 of title 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations (8 CFR part 217) as follows:

PART 217—VISA WAIVER PROGRAM

1. The authority citation for Part 217 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1103, 1187; 8 CFR part 2.

2. Section 217.5 is amended by revising paragraph (a) and adding a new paragraph (h) to read as follows: