Department of State Acquisition Regulation

AGENCY:

Department of State.

ACTION:

Proposed rule.

SUMMARY:

The Department of State (DOS) proposes to amend the Department of State Acquisition Regulation (DOSAR) to provide procedural changes relating to the suspension and debarment process.

DATES:

The Department of State will accept comments on this proposed rule until May 27, 2016.

ADDRESSES:

You may submit comments by any of the following methods:

• E-mail: KosarCM@state.gov. You must include the RIN in the subject line of your message.
• Mail (paper, disk, or CD-ROM submissions): Ms. Colleen Kosar, Policy Division, Office of the Procurement Executive, A/OPE, 2201 C Street NW., Suite 1060, State Annex Number 15, Washington, DC 20520.
• Persons with access to the Internet may view this proposed rule and submit comments by visiting the regulations.gov Web site at: http://www.regulations.gov/search/Regs/home.html#home,, and searching for docket number DOS-2016-0012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Colleen Kosar, Policy Division, Office of the Procurement Executive, A/OPE, 2201 C Street NW., Suite 1060, State Annex Number 15, Washington, DC 20520. Telephone 703-516-1685.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The purpose of this proposed rule is to update 48 CFR part 609, subpart 609.4, Debarment, Suspension, and Ineligibility and part 649, Termination of Contracts. Primarily, this update simplifies the procedural aspects of the suspension and debarment process, by simplifying the fact-finding process, wherein a single fact-finding official may be used in lieu of a fact-finding panel. Specifically, the proposed rule would:

• Amend section 609.403-70 to remove the definition of “Notice,” and revise the definition of “fact-finding official.”
• Make an editorial change to section 609.405-1.
• Redesignate section 609.405-70 as section 649.101-70.
• Amend section 609.406-3(a)(1) to remove references to mandated actions by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG). The OIG is autonomous by statute and not subject to direction from the DOSAR.
• Make editorial changes to paragraphs 609.406-3(a)(2), (b)(2) and (c)(2).
• Add paragraph 609.406-3(a)(3) to make it clear that the referral file may be supplemented prior to determining whether or not to propose debarment.
• Revise paragraphs 609.406-3(b)(3)-(7) to simplify the fact-finding process, wherein a single fact-finding official may be used in lieu of a fact-finding panel and to eliminate specific entitlements and deadlines not required by the FAR.
• Amend section 609.406-3(d) and 609.407-3(d) to remove “and to the General Services Administration in accordance with 609.404.”
• Amend section 609.407-3(b)(2) to change “panel” to “official.”

Regulatory Findings

Administrative Procedure Act

In accordance with the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act governing rules promulgated by federal agencies that affect the public (5 U.S.C. 552 and 553), the Department is publishing this proposed rule and inviting public comment.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Department of State, in accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), has reviewed this regulation and, by approving it, certifies that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This determination was based on the fact that the changes proposed in this update have no impact on small businesses. The number of small businesses considered for suspension or debarment will not grow or shrink as a result of the proposed changes. The Department analyzed the suspension/debarment actions that occurred in FY14 and no small businesses were impacted.

Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995

This proposed rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any year and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995.

Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996

This proposed rule is not a major rule as defined by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Act of 1996 (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.). This proposed rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-based companies to compete with foreign-based companies in domestic and import markets. This determination was based on the fact that the proposed changes are intended to simplify the procedural aspects of the suspension and debarment process. The proposed rule does not place new requirements on contract performance. The proposed rule does not have a significant cost or administrative impact on offerors or contractors.

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563

Executive Orders (E.O.) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts and equity). E.O. 13563 emphasized the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. The Department of State does not consider this proposed rule to be an “economically significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866.

In addition, the Department is exempt from Executive Order 12866 except to the extent that it is promulgating regulations in conjunction with a domestic agency that are significant regulatory actions. The Department has nevertheless reviewed the regulation to ensure its consistency with the regulatory philosophy and principles set forth in the Executive Orders and finds that the benefits of updating this rule outweigh any costs, which the Department assesses to be minimal.

Executive Order 13132

This proposed rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with section 6 of Executive Order 13132, it is determined that this proposed rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to require consultations or warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement.

Executive Order 13175

The Department has determined that this proposed rulemaking will not have tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct compliance costs on Indian tribal governments, and will not pre-empt tribal law. Accordingly, the requirements of Executive Order 13175 do not apply to this proposed rulemaking.

Paperwork Reduction Act

The proposed rule imposes no new or revised information collections under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1980 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35).

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 609 and 649

• Administrative practice and procedure
• Government procurement

For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Department of State proposes to amend 48 CFR chapter 6 as follows:

1. The authority citation for 48 CFR parts 609 and 649 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 22 U.S.C. 2651a, 40 U.S.C. 121(c) and 48 CFR chapter 1.

PART 609—CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS

2. Revise section 609.403-70 to read as follows:

3. In section 609.405-1, remove “609.405-70” and add in its place “649.101-70”.

4. Redesignate section 609.405-70 as 649.101-70 and revise the heading of redesignated section 649.101-70 to read as follows:

5. In section 609.406-3, revise paragraphs (a), (b)(2)-(b)(7), (c)(2) and (d), to read as follows:

6. In section 609.407-3:

a. In paragraph (b)(2), remove the word “panel”, and add in its place “official”.

b. In paragraph (d), remove “and to the General Services Administration in accordance with 609.404”.

PART 649—TERMINATION OF CONTRACTS

7. In Part 649, add section heading 649.101 to read as follows: