§Why CasetextPricing

SANDQUIST v. LEBO AUTOMOTIVE

Respondents’ Petition for Review

39 Cited authorities

  1. AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion

    563 U.S. 333 (2011)   Cited 3,752 times   601 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a ban on collective-action waivers in those contracts worked to "disfavor arbitration"

  2. First Options of Chi., Inc. v. Kaplan

    514 U.S. 938 (1995)   Cited 5,342 times   47 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a circuit court reviewing a district court's disposition of an arbitration award should apply "ordinary, not special, standards."

  3. Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.

    537 U.S. 79 (2002)   Cited 2,510 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that compliance with a time-limit on the initiation of arbitration was not a gateway "question of arbitrability" that was reserved for the courts as it was procedural rather than substantive

  4. AT&T Techs., Inc. v. Commc'ns Workers of Am.

    475 U.S. 643 (1986)   Cited 5,366 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that it was for the court to decide whether a particular labor dispute fell within the arbitration clause of a collective-bargaining agreement

  5. Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. Animalfeeds Intr.

    559 U.S. 662 (2010)   Cited 1,666 times   211 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a prudential ripeness argument was waived

  6. Volt Info. Scis., Inc. v. Bd. of Trs.

    489 U.S. 468 (1989)   Cited 3,201 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Federal Arbitration Act requires courts to enforce arbitration agreements according to their terms, including where the parties "specify by contract the rules under which arbitration will be conducted"

  7. Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. Waffle House, Inc.

    534 U.S. 279 (2002)   Cited 1,485 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a private arbitration agreement between an employee and an employer could not bind a nonparty governmental agency, the EEOC, and thus that the agreement—which was enforceable against the employee under the Federal Arbitration Act—did not limit the types of remedies the agency could seek in an enforcement action it initiated under Title VII

  8. Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter

    569 U.S. 564 (2013)   Cited 704 times   79 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when determining whether to vacate an Award under Section 10 of the FAA, "an arbitral decision even arguably construing or applying the contract must stand, regardless of a court's view of its (de)merits"

  9. Green Tree Fin. Corp. v. Bazzle

    539 U.S. 444 (2003)   Cited 676 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "gateway matters," such as the scope of an arbitration provision, should be determined by courts and not arbitrators

  10. Deposit Guaranty Nat. Bank v. Roper

    445 U.S. 326 (1980)   Cited 986 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Holding that denial of class certification is appealable after entry of final judgment

  11. Rule 8.1115 - Citation of opinions

    Cal. R. 8.1115   Cited 73,840 times

    (a) Unpublished opinion Except as provided in (b), an opinion of a California Court of Appeal or superior court appellate division that is not certified for publication or ordered published must not be cited or relied on by a court or a party in any other action. (b)Exceptions An unpublished opinion may be cited or relied on: (1) When the opinion is relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel; or (2) When the opinion is relevant to a criminal or disciplinary

  12. Rule 8.504 - Form and contents of petition, answer, and reply

    Cal. R. 8.504   Cited 21 times

    (a)In general Except as provided in this rule, a petition for review, answer, and reply must comply with the relevant provisions of rule 8.204. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007.) (b) Contents of a petition (1) The body of the petition must begin with a concise, nonargumentative statement of the issues presented for review, framing them in terms of the facts of the case but without unnecessary detail. (2) The petition must explain how the case presents a ground for review under rule 8.500(b)