LONG BEACH POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION v. CITY OF LONG BEACH(LOS ANGELES TIMES COMMUNICATIONS) (To be called and continued to the March 2014 calendar.)
Appellant, City of Long Beach, Petition for Review
Concluding defendant made a good faith showing in support of his discovery motion where "the information which defendant seeks may have considerable significance to the preparation of his defense, and the documents have been requested with adequate specificity to preclude the possibility that defendant is engaging in a 'fishing expedition' "
Adopting a “substantial nexus or connection” approach in applying the California long-arm statute and, in rejecting other approaches, questioning the wisdom “of importing a causation test from tort law to measure a matter that is fundamentally one of relationship and fairness rather than causation”
Holding that Cal. Fam. Code § 7540's conclusive presumption "is not really a presumption at all but instead is a rule of substantive law," as contrasted with Cal. Fam. Code § 7611's rebuttable presumptions
Holding that newspaper was not entitled to records relating to peace officer's administrative appeal of disciplinary matter under California Public Records Act
In CaliforniaAssn. of Psychology Providers v. Rank (1990) 51 Cal.3d 1, 9, we said that "our minute orders... cannot serve as precedent to guide future decisions."
Holding that a city is not entitled to declaratory relief regarding its disclosure obligations under the California Public Records Act, but not deciding whether a third party —such as the Union here—is entitled to such relief
5 U.S.C. § 552 Cited 12,169 times 556 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party
In section 6250, the Legislature declared it was “ ‘mindful of the right of individuals to privacy,’ ” and the dual concern for privacy and disclosure appears in numerous provisions throughout the CPRA.
In Government Code section 6255 (fn. 6, supra) it permits rejection of disclosure demands only under express exemptions or where the public interest in disclosure is 'clearly' outweighed.
An appeal may be taken in a civil action or proceeding as provided in Sections 904.1, 904.2, 904.3, and 904.5. Ca. Civ. Proc. Code § 904 Amended by Stats 2007 ch 263 (AB 310),s 9.5, eff. 1/1/2008.