32 Cited authorities

  1. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.

    505 U.S. 504 (1992)   Cited 2,400 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an express warranty was not a "requirement ... imposed under State law" because the obligation was imposed by the warrantor
  2. Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

    504 U.S. 374 (1992)   Cited 1,695 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Airline Deregulation Act, which prohibits States from enforcing any law "relating to rates, routes, or services" of any air carrier, preempted fare-advertising guidelines that "would have a significant impact upon" the airlines' ability to charge fares
  3. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Massachusetts

    471 U.S. 724 (1985)   Cited 1,515 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the National Labor Relations Act does not permit “unions and employers to bargain for terms of employment that state law forbids employers to establish unilaterally”
  4. American Airlines, Inc. v. Wolens

    513 U.S. 219 (1995)   Cited 777 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act preempted by the Federal Airline Deregulation Act to the extent the state law applied to airline frequent flier programs
  5. Rowe v. New Hampshire Motor Transp. Ass'n

    552 U.S. 364 (2008)   Cited 387 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that targeted ground carrier regulations were pre-empted by a statute modeled on the ADA
  6. Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

    29 Cal.4th 1134 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 1,653 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff cannot recover damages under Cal. Bus. Prof. Code § 17200 unless plaintiff has "an ownership interest in the money it seeks to recover"
  7. American Trucking v. City of Los Angeles

    559 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 1,264 times
    Holding plaintiff seeking injunction "not entitled to relief" in absence of showing "likelihood of irreparable harm"
  8. Kasky v. Nike

    27 Cal.4th 939 (Cal. 2002)   Cited 665 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statements by the defendant about the working conditions of its overseas employees were not protected by the First Amendment and could give rise to a claim for fraudulent business practices under the UCL
  9. Bernardo v. Planned Parenthood Federation of America

    115 Cal.App.4th 322 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004)   Cited 105 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that plaintiffs did not have a reasonable likelihood of prevailing on the merits because an "opinion" was insufficient to state a claim of false advertising or an unfair competition claim
  10. Viva! Internat. Voice for Animals v. Adidas Promotional Retail Operations, Inc.

    41 Cal.4th 929 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 84 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting "wildlife management" is "historically within the traditional police powers of, the states"
  11. Section 17200 - Unfair competition defined

    Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200   Cited 17,817 times   315 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting unlawful business practices
  12. Section 226 - Itemized statement of wages

    Cal. Lab. Code § 226   Cited 2,234 times   117 Legal Analyses
    Providing only statutory penalties
  13. Section 1194 - Recovery by employee in civil action regardless of agreement to receive lesser wage

    Cal. Lab. Code § 1194   Cited 1,738 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing an employee receiving less than the legal overtime compensation to recover the unpaid balance, interest, attorney's fees, and costs of suit in a civil action
  14. Section 2802 - Indemnification for necessary expenditures and losses incurred in direct consequence of discharge of duties

    Cal. Lab. Code § 2802   Cited 1,077 times   122 Legal Analyses
    Pertaining to expense reimbursements
  15. Section 41713 - Preemption of authority over prices, routes, and service

    49 U.S.C. § 41713   Cited 820 times   32 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing that the preemption provision does not limit a State from "carrying out its proprietary powers and rights"
  16. Section 14501 - Federal authority over intrastate transportation

    49 U.S.C. § 14501   Cited 676 times   31 Legal Analyses
    Granting a limited exemption to a state or its political subdivisions from the federally preempted regulation of the towing industry by permitting a state or its political subdivisions to regulate nonconsent tow fees
  17. Section 3700 - Ways of securing payment of compensation

    Cal. Lab. Code § 3700   Cited 171 times
    Requiring every employer to secure the payment of compensation by obtaining workers' compensation insurance or obtaining a certification of consent to self-insure
  18. Section 976 - Generally

    Cal. Unemp. Ins. Code § 976   Cited 23 times
    Requiring contributions to the state unemployment fund
  19. Section 984 - Worker contributions

    Cal. Unemp. Ins. Code § 984   Cited 16 times
    Requiring employee contributions to the state disability fund, which employers must withhold from employee wages under Unemp. Ins. Code, § 986
  20. Section 13020 - Generally

    Cal. Unemp. Ins. Code § 13020   Cited 15 times
    Requiring employers to with-hold income taxes from employee wages
  21. Rule 8.268 - Rehearing

    Cal. R. 8.268   Cited 77 times

    (a)Power to order rehearing (1) On petition of a party or on its own motion, a reviewing court may order rehearing of any decision that is not final in that court on filing. (2) An order for rehearing must be filed before the decision is final. If the clerk's office is closed on the date of finality, the court may file the order on the next day the clerk's office is open. (b)Petition and answer (1) A party may serve and file a petition for rehearing within 15 days after: (A) The filing of the decision;

  22. Rule 8.504 - Form and contents of petition, answer, and reply

    Cal. R. 8.504   Cited 21 times

    (a)In general Except as provided in this rule, a petition for review, answer, and reply must comply with the relevant provisions of rule 8.204. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007.) (b) Contents of a petition (1) The body of the petition must begin with a concise, nonargumentative statement of the issues presented for review, framing them in terms of the facts of the case but without unnecessary detail. (2) The petition must explain how the case presents a ground for review under rule 8.500(b)