30 Cited authorities

  1. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.

    505 U.S. 504 (1992)   Cited 2,165 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an express warranty was not a "requirement ... imposed under State law" because the obligation was imposed by the warrantor
  2. Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.

    504 U.S. 374 (1992)   Cited 1,424 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding state airfare-advertisement rules preempted by federal statute as “relating to [air carriers'] rates, routes, or services”
  3. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Massachusetts

    471 U.S. 724 (1985)   Cited 1,443 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the National Labor Relations Act does not permit “unions and employers to bargain for terms of employment that state law forbids employers to establish unilaterally”
  4. American Airlines, Inc. v. Wolens

    513 U.S. 219 (1995)   Cited 676 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding the Illinois Consumer Fraud Act preempted by the Federal Airline Deregulation Act to the extent the state law applied to airline frequent flier programs
  5. Korea Supply Company v. Lockheed Martin Corp.

    29 Cal.4th 1134 (Cal. 2003)   Cited 1,223 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff cannot recover damages under Cal. Bus. Prof. Code § 17200 unless plaintiff has "an ownership interest in the money it seeks to recover"
  6. Rowe v. New Hampshire Motor Transp. Ass'n

    552 U.S. 364 (2008)   Cited 291 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that targeted ground carrier regulations were pre-empted by a statute modeled on the ADA
  7. American Trucking v. City of Los Angeles

    559 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 953 times
    Holding plaintiff seeking injunction "not entitled to relief" in absence of showing "likelihood of irreparable harm"
  8. Kasky v. Nike, Inc.

    27 Cal.4th 939 (Cal. 2002)   Cited 506 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that statements by the defendant about the working conditions of its overseas employees were not protected by the First Amendment and could give rise to a claim for fraudulent business practices under the UCL
  9. Californians for Safe & Competitive Dump Truck Transportation v. Mendonca

    152 F.3d 1184 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 97 times
    Holding California wage law not preempted
  10. Viva! International Voice for Animals v. Adidas Promotional Retail Operations, Inc.

    41 Cal.4th 929 (Cal. 2007)   Cited 70 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting "wildlife management" is "historically within the traditional police powers of, the states"
  11. Section 17200

    Cal. Bus. and Prof'l. Code § 17200   Cited 12,652 times   249 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting unlawful business practices
  12. Section 226

    Cal. Lab. Code § 226   Cited 1,163 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Providing only statutory penalties
  13. Section 41713 - Preemption of authority over prices, routes, and service

    49 U.S.C. § 41713   Cited 697 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Preempting state laws "related to a price, route, or service of an air carrier"
  14. Section 1194

    Cal. Lab. Code § 1194   Cited 613 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Providing "any employee receiving less than the . . . legal overtime compensation applicable to the employee is entitled to recover in a civil action the unpaid balance of the full amount of this . . . overtime compensation"
  15. Section 14501 - Federal authority over intrastate transportation

    49 U.S.C. § 14501   Cited 523 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Granting a limited exemption to a state or its political subdivisions from the federally preempted regulation of the towing industry by permitting a state or its political subdivisions to regulate nonconsent tow fees
  16. Section 976

    Cal. Unemp. Ins. Code § 976   Cited 9 times
    Requiring contributions to the State Unemployment Fund
  17. Section 13020

    Cal. Unemp. Ins. Code § 13020   Cited 8 times
    Requiring employers to withhold income taxes from employee wages
  18. Section 984

    Cal. Unemp. Ins. Code § 984   Cited 4 times
    Requiring employee contributions to the State Disability Fund, which employers must withhold from employee wages under Unemployment Insurance Code section 986
  19. Section 976.6

    Cal. Unemp. Ins. Code § 976.6   Cited 1 times
    Requiring contributions to the State Employment Training Fund
  20. Rule 8.268 - Rehearing

    Cal. R. 8.268   Cited 43 times

    (a)Power to order rehearing (1) On petition of a party or on its own motion, a reviewing court may order rehearing of any decision that is not final in that court on filing. (2) An order for rehearing must be filed before the decision is final. If the clerk's office is closed on the date of finality, the court may file the order on the next day the clerk's office is open. (b)Petition and answer (1) A party may serve and file a petition for rehearing within 15 days after: (A) The filing of the decision;

  21. Rule 8.504 - Form and contents of petition, answer, and reply

    Cal. R. 8.504   Cited 13 times

    (a)In general Except as provided in this rule, a petition for review, answer, and reply must comply with the relevant provisions of rule 8.204. (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007.) (b) Contents of a petition (1) The body of the petition must begin with a concise, nonargumentative statement of the issues presented for review, framing them in terms of the facts of the case but without unnecessary detail. (2) The petition must explain how the case presents a ground for review under rule 8.500(b)