14 Cited authorities

  1. Evans v. City of Berkeley

    38 Cal.4th 1 (Cal. 2006)   Cited 538 times
    Rejecting allegation contradicted by judicially noticed facts
  2. Glendale City Employees' Assn., Inc. v. City of Glendale

    15 Cal.3d 328 (Cal. 1975)   Cited 183 times
    Stating that once an MOU is approved by a governmental body, it becomes a binding agreement
  3. Stanson v. Mott

    17 Cal.3d 206 (Cal. 1976)   Cited 140 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that although state agency could disseminate “information” to the public in an election campaign, it could not use money to spread “promotional” materials
  4. Fire Fighters Union v. City of Vallejo

    12 Cal.3d 608 (Cal. 1974)   Cited 116 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Fire Fighters Union v. City of Vallejo (1974) 12 Cal.3d 608, 116 Cal.Rptr. 507, 526 P.2d 971, we rejected a nondelegation challenge to a Vallejo city charter provision that permitted an arbitral board to resolve disputed terms of employment after considering " ‘all factors relevant to the issues from the standpoint of both the employer and the employee, including the City's financial condition.’ "
  5. Taylor v. Crane

    24 Cal.3d 442 (Cal. 1979)   Cited 46 times
    Upholding an arbitrator's ruling that a police officer who had been discharged should be reinstated where a collective bargaining agreement between the police and the City provided for arbitration of grievances
  6. SKF Farms v. Superior Court

    153 Cal.App.3d 902 (Cal. Ct. App. 1984)   Cited 31 times

    Docket Nos. 31427, 31428. March 15, 1984. COUNSEL Sutherland Gerber, Ravinder Samra, Ronis, Ronis Ronis and John George Ronis for Petitioners. No appearance for Respondent. Hart Michaelis, James I. Michaelis, Engstrom, Lipscomb Lack and Douglas S. Knoll for Real Parties in Interest. OPINION BUTLER, J. Petitioners SKF Farms and Jerry Gonzales, Sr., Jerry Gonzales, Jr., and Victor J. Gonzales (collectively called petitioners) seek writs of mandate after the superior court sustained without leave to

  7. Travis v. Board of Trustees of California State University

    161 Cal.App.4th 335 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008)   Cited 4 times

    No. B196907. March 26, 2008. Appeal from the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, No. BS103313, Dzintra I. Janavs, Judge. Rothner, Segall Greenstone, Glenn Rothner and Jonathan Cohen for Plaintiff and Appellant. California State University Office of General Counsel, Christine Helwick and Susan Westover for Defendants and Respondents. OPINION RUBIN, J. John Travis appeals from the judgment entered after the trial court denied his mandate petition, which sought a determination that the Board of Trustees

  8. Orange County Employees Assn., Inc. v. County of Orange

    14 Cal.App.4th 575 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993)   Cited 9 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Construing §§ 830.33, 830.35 & 830.36
  9. Bohrer v. County of San Diego

    104 Cal.App.3d 155 (Cal. Ct. App. 1980)   Cited 16 times
    Holding that the court erred in taking judicial notice of the cause of death on the decedent's death certificate where the cause was in dispute
  10. Henderson v. Board of Education

    78 Cal.App.3d 875 (Cal. Ct. App. 1978)   Cited 15 times
    In Henderson, ad hoc advisory committees had been created for the purpose of advising the board of education about the qualifications of candidates for appointment to a vacant position. Each of the advisory committees was composed solely of members of the governing body of the school district numbering less than a quorum of the governing body.
  11. Section 452 - Matters permitting judicial notice

    Cal. Evid. Code § 452   Cited 7,904 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Permitting notice to be taken of the "[o]fficial acts of the . . . judicial departments . . . of any state of the United States"
  12. Section 1286.2 - Grounds for vacating award

    Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1286.2   Cited 1,040 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Vacating an arbitration award
  13. Section 3500 - Legislative intent

    Cal. Gov. Code § 3500   Cited 330 times   6 Legal Analyses

    (a) It is the purpose of this chapter to promote full communication between public employers and their employees by providing a reasonable method of resolving disputes regarding wages, hours, and other terms and conditions of employment between public employers and public employee organizations. It is also the purpose of this chapter to promote the improvement of personnel management and employer-employee relations within the various public agencies in the State of California by providing a uniform