263 Cited authorities

  1. Crawford v. Washington

    541 U.S. 36 (2004)   Cited 14,331 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an absent witness's statements are admissible under the Confrontation Clause "only where the declarant is unavailable, and only where the defendant [] had a prior opportunity to cross-examine"
  2. Bell v. Wolfish

    441 U.S. 520 (1979)   Cited 13,530 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the reasonableness of a search is determined under the circumstances
  3. Hudson v. Palmer

    468 U.S. 517 (1984)   Cited 9,382 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that prisoners have no reasonable expectation of privacy
  4. Turner v. Safley

    482 U.S. 78 (1987)   Cited 7,921 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a prison regulation satisfied this factor because it did not "deprive prisoners of all means of expression," and instead barred "communication only with a limited class of other people with whom prison officials have particular cause to be concerned"
  5. Roper v. Simmons

    543 U.S. 551 (2005)   Cited 2,649 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that death sentences for juveniles are unconstitutional
  6. Chapman v. California

    386 U.S. 18 (1967)   Cited 18,592 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that error is harmless only if "harmless beyond a reasonable doubt"
  7. Delaware v. Van Arsdall

    475 U.S. 673 (1986)   Cited 6,213 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a restriction on defendant's ability to cross-examine witness in violation of Sixth Amendment was non-structural error
  8. Old Chief v. United States

    519 U.S. 172 (1997)   Cited 2,344 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that probative value of evidence "may be calculated by comparing evidentiary alternatives"
  9. Manson v. Brathwaite

    432 U.S. 98 (1977)   Cited 5,072 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, if police procedures are unduly suggestive, identification will be excluded if its reliability does not outweigh corrupting influence of suggestive procedure
  10. Davis v. Alaska

    415 U.S. 308 (1974)   Cited 5,110 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that this confrontation right is applicable to state and federal defendants alike
  11. Section 2510 - Definitions

    18 U.S.C. § 2510   Cited 3,826 times   61 Legal Analyses
    Limiting the government's ability to monitor electronic communications
  12. Section 2511 - Interception and disclosure of wire, oral, or electronic communications prohibited

    18 U.S.C. § 2511   Cited 2,482 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Imposing a penalty on persons who “intentionally intercept ... any wire, oral, or electronic communication”
  13. Section 2515 - Prohibition of use as evidence of intercepted wire or oral communications

    18 U.S.C. § 2515   Cited 676 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Codifying the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine for wiretapping evidence