59 Cited authorities

  1. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.

    545 U.S. 546 (2005)   Cited 4,154 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the supplemental jurisdiction statute permits the exercise of diversity jurisdiction over additional plaintiffs who fail to satisfy the minimum amount-in-controversy requirement, as long as the other elements of diversity jurisdiction are present and at least one named plaintiff does satisfy the amount-in-controversy requirement
  2. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Servs., Inc.

    523 U.S. 75 (1998)   Cited 5,146 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]hatever evidentiary route the plaintiff chooses to follow, he or she must always prove that the conduct at issue was not merely tinged with offensive . . . connotations"
  3. Connecticut Nat. Bank v. Germain

    503 U.S. 249 (1992)   Cited 2,695 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 1292 applies also to bankruptcy jurisdiction and is not displaced by § 158(d)
  4. Department of Interior v. Klamath Water Users Prot. A.

    532 U.S. 1 (2001)   Cited 1,008 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the determination that records are not inter- or intra-agency "rules out any application of Exemption 5"
  5. Gwaltney v. Chesapeake Bay Foundation

    484 U.S. 49 (1987)   Cited 949 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that jurisdiction is established "when the citizen-plaintiffs make a good-faith allegation of continuous or intermittent violation"
  6. Perrin v. United States

    444 U.S. 37 (1979)   Cited 1,120 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that commercial bribery falls under the definition of bribery under the Travel Act, which was passed nine years before RICO was enacted
  7. John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp.

    493 U.S. 146 (1989)   Cited 542 times
    Holding that records originally assembled for other purposes can come within Exemption 7 if subsequently compiled for law enforcement purposes
  8. Miranda v. Anchondo

    684 F.3d 844 (9th Cir. 2012)   Cited 752 times
    Holding that questions of statutory construction and interpretation are reviewed de novo
  9. Fleming v. Pickard

    581 F.3d 922 (9th Cir. 2009)   Cited 772 times
    Holding that judgment on the pleadings is properly granted “when there is no issue of material fact in dispute, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law”
  10. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Oregon v. Various Tort Claimants

    661 F.3d 417 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 492 times
    Holding that Bankruptcy Court erred in not granting motion to strike allegations of sexual abuse
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 344,855 times   920 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Section 1251 - Congressional declaration of goals and policy

    33 U.S.C. § 1251   Cited 3,541 times   61 Legal Analyses
    Designating the Administrator of the EPA to "administer this chapter"
  13. Section 1365 - Citizen suits

    33 U.S.C. § 1365   Cited 2,192 times   28 Legal Analyses
    Granting Administrator right to intervene in citizen suits
  14. Section 1311 - Effluent limitations

    33 U.S.C. § 1311   Cited 1,967 times   47 Legal Analyses
    Imposing general prohibition on "the discharge of any pollutant by any person"
  15. Section 1342 - National pollutant discharge elimination system

    33 U.S.C. § 1342   Cited 1,475 times   43 Legal Analyses
    Granting EPA the authority to require a permit for such discharges
  16. Section 1362 - Definitions

    33 U.S.C. § 1362   Cited 1,163 times   101 Legal Analyses
    Defining “pollutant” to include “rock”
  17. Section 122.3 - Exclusions

    40 C.F.R. § 122.3   Cited 70 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Excepting "introduction of pollutants from non point-source agricultural and silvicultural activities"