J. Truett Payne Co. v. Chrysler Motors Corp.
451 U.S. 557 (1981) Cited 306 times 2 Legal AnalysesFinding that House and Senate reports indicated "strong opposition in both houses" to proposed provision
Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Co.
282 U.S. 555 (1931) Cited 1,102 timesHolding that although damages must be "the certain result of the wrong," they may be "uncertain in respect of their amount."
Bell Atl. Corp. v. AT&T Corp.
339 F.3d 294 (5th Cir. 2003) Cited 194 times 5 Legal AnalysesHolding that class certification is inappropriate where complex, individualized damages calculations predominate over the liability issues that are common to the class
Moore v. Jas. H. Matthews Co.
682 F.2d 830 (9th Cir. 1982) Cited 183 timesAdopting a lodestar compensation approach based on the fixing of a reasonable rate of hourly compensation
Telecor Communications v. Southwestern Bell
305 F.3d 1124 (10th Cir. 2002) Cited 54 timesHolding district court erred in granting summary judgment for plaintiff as to scope of relevant product market because plaintiff had not alleged sufficient facts to satisfy its burden of showing products were interchangeable
New York v. Julius Nasso Concrete Corp.
202 F.3d 82 (2d Cir. 2000) Cited 48 timesHolding that construction contractors were collaterally estopped from challenging liability in state's antitrust action based on prior criminal convictions under RICO
Coastal Fuels Puerto Rico v. Caribbean Petro
175 F.3d 18 (1st Cir. 1999) Cited 15 timesAffirming district court's rejection of damages expert's testimony because of "considerable and unjustified variance" between testimony and Rule 26 report and because expert "unintentionally misled [court to believe] that he had performed certain crucial calculations" he had not actually done