Microsoft Corporation v. Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise et alMOTION for Summary Judgment of No Inequitable Conduct -D. Del.May 9, 2008IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ALCATEL-LUCENT ENTERPRISE and GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant. C.A. No. 07-90-SLR MICROSOFT CORP.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO INEQUITABLE CONDUCT Pursuant to FRCP 56 and Microsoft Corporation’s opening brief being filed concurrently with this motion, Microsoft hereby respectfully moves for entry of summary judgment on each of Defendants’ inequitable conduct defenses and counterclaims – specifically that U.S. Patent Nos. 6,421,439 (“the ’439 Patent”), 6,430,289 (“the ’289 Patent”), 6,263,064, and 6,728,357 were not secured through inequitable conduct. Case 1:07-cv-00090-SLR Document 165 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 1 of 3 Dated: May 9, 2008 Respectfully submitted, FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. /s/ Thomas L. Halkowski __ Thomas L. Halkowski (#4099) 919 N. Market Street, Suite 1100 P.O. Box 1114 Wilmington, DE 19899-1114 Tel: (302) 652-5070 Fax: (302) 652-0607 halkowski@fr.com John E. Gartman 12390 El Camino Real San Diego, CA 92130 Tel: (858) 678-5070 Fax: (858) 678-5099 gartman@fr.com Ruffin B. Cordell Linda Liu Kordziel Indranil Mukerji William Sekyi Kfir Levy Kori Anne Bagrowski Robert P. Courtney 1425 K Street N.W., Suite 1100 Washington D.C. 20005 Tel: (202) 783-5070 Fax: (202) 783-2331 cordell@fr.com kordziel@fr.com mukerji@fr.com sekyi@fr.com kylevy@fr.com bagrowski@fr.com courtney@fr.com ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF MICROSOFT CORPORATION Case 1:07-cv-00090-SLR Document 165 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 2 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on May 9, 2008 I electronically filed with the Clerk of Court MICROSOFT CORPORATION’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO INEQUITABLE CONDUCT using CM/ECF which will send notification of such filing to the following individuals, who were also served via e-mail: Jack B. Blumenfeld Maryellen Noreika MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNEL LLP 1201 North Market Street Wilmington, DE 19899-1347 jblumenfeld@mnat.com mnoreika@mnat.com (Also served via hand delivery) Steven C. Cherny Karen Y. Tu Clement J. Naples LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 885 Third Avenue, Suite 1000 New York, NY 10022 steven.cherny@lw.com karen.tu@lw.com clement.naples@lw.com David A. Nelson Alan Devlin Brett M. Doran LATHAM & WATKINS LLP Sears Tower, Suite 5800 Chicago, IL 60606 david.nelson@lw.com alan.devlin@lw.com brett.doran@lw.com Michael J. Schallop LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 140 Scott Drive Menlo Park, CA 94025 michael.schallop@lw.com Susan S. Azad LATHAM & WATKINS LLP 633 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000 Los Angeles, CA 90071 susan.azad@lw.com /s/ Thomas L. Halkowski Thomas L. Halkowski Case 1:07-cv-00090-SLR Document 165 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 3 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. ALCATEL-LUCENT ENTERPRISE and GENESYS TELECOMMUNICATIONS LABORATORIES, INC., Defendant. C.A. No. 07-90-SLR [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MICROSOFT CORP.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO INEQUITABLE CONDUCT AND NOW, the Court, having considered the issues raised in Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation’s Motion for Summary Judgment of No Inequitable Conduct, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. SO ORDERED this day of , 2008. United States District Court Judge Case 1:07-cv-00090-SLR Document 165-2 Filed 05/09/2008 Page 1 of 1
