Jane Doe v. David K. Elam II

REPLY in support of MOTION for Leave to to Proceed under a Pseudonym and for Protective Order 28

C.D. Cal.June 29, 2015

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFF TO PROCEED UNDER A PSEUDONYM AND PROTECTIVE ORDER Seth A. Gold (SBN 163220) seth.gold@klgates.com Cassandra Jones (SBN 270845) cassandra.jones@klgates.com Akhil Sheth (SBN 294721) akhil.sheth@klgates.com K&L Gates LLP (Cyber Civil Rights Legal Project) 10100 Santa Monica Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90067 T: (310) 552-5000 F: (310) 552-5001 Attorneys for Plaintiff Jane Doe UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Jane Doe Plaintiff, vs. David K. Elam II, Defendant. Case No. CV 14-9788 PSG (MANx) Reply In Support Of Plaintiff’s Motion for Order Permitting Plaintiff to Proceed under a Pseudonym and Protective Order Hon. Philip S. Gutierrez Date: July 13, 2015 Time: 1:30 p.m. Location: Courtroom 880 Case 2:14-cv-09788-PSG-MAN Document 33 Filed 06/29/15 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:187 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ORDER PERMITTING PLAINTIFF TO PROCEED UNDER A PSEUDONYM AND PROTECTIVE ORDER REPLY MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES Defendant David K. Elam II (“Defendant”) has not filed an opposition brief in response to the Motion for an Order Permitting Plaintiff to Proceed under a Pseudonym and Protective Order filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe (“Plaintiff”), ECF No. 28. Under 9th Circuit precedent and the Central District of California’s Local Rules, this underlines Defendant’s consent to the relief sought by Plaintiff through the Motion. See United States v. Warren, 601 F.2d 471, 473–74 (9th Cir. 1979); L.R. 7-12. For this reason and all of the reasons set forth in the Motion, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant the Motion and issue the order sought therein. Given the foregoing, this Court should grant Plaintiff’s Motion in its entirety. Dated: June 29, 2015 By: /s/ Akhil Sheth Seth A. Gold Cassandra Jones Akhil Sheth K&L Gates LLP (Cyber Civil Rights Legal Project) Attorneys for Plaintiff Jane Doe Case 2:14-cv-09788-PSG-MAN Document 33 Filed 06/29/15 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:188