Honeywell Intl Inc., et al v. Apple Computer Inc., et alMOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Person -D. Del.August 25, 2006IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE _____________________________________________________ HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. and ) HONEYWELL INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 04-1338-KAJ ) APPLE COMPUTER, INC; et al., ) ) Defendants ) ____________________________________________________ ) DEFENDANT INNOLUX DISPLAY CORPORATION’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. Rule 12(b)(2), Defendant InnoLux Display Corporation (“IDC”) moves to dismiss the above-captioned action for lack of personal jurisdiction over IDC for the reasons set forth more fully in the brief filed concurrently herewith. DATED: August 25, 2006 OF COUNSEL: Donald R. McPhail DUANE MORRIS LLP 1667 K Street, NW Suite 700 Washington, DC 20006 (202) 776-7800 E-Mail: drmcphail@duanemorris.com DUANE MORRIS LLP /s/ Daniel V. Folt Daniel V. Folt (Del. I.D. No. 3143) Gary W. Lipkin (Del. I.D. No. 4044) 1100 North Market Street, 12th Floor Wilmington, Delaware 19801 Tel: 302.657.4900 Fax: 302.657.4901 E-Mail: dfolt@duanemorris.com gwlipkin@duanemorris.com Attorneys for Defendant InnoLux Display Corp. DM1\680402.1 Case 1:04-cv-01338-JJF Document 536 Filed 08/25/2006 Page 1 of 1
