Griffin Technology Holdings Inc. v. Clearwire Corporation

MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and for Failure to State a Claim -

D. Del.January 9, 2013

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE GRIFFIN TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS INC., Plaintiff, v. CLEARWIRE CORPORATION, Defendant. Civil Action No.: 12-1308 (RGA) CLEARWIRE CORPORATION’S MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO RULES 12(B)(1) AND 12(B)(6) FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION AND FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendant Clearwire Corporation (“Clearwire”), by and through its respective undersigned attorneys, respectfully requests that the Court dismiss this case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (12)(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction as well as pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (12)(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Dated: January 9, 2013 /s/ Mary B. Matterer Richard K. Herrmann (#405) Mary B. Matterer (#2696) MORRIS JAMES LLP 500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500 Wilmington, DE 19801 (302) 888-6800 rherrmann@morrisjames.com mmatterer@morrisjames.com Attorneys for Defendant Clearwire Corporation Case 1:12-cv-01308-RGA Document 9 Filed 01/09/13 Page 1 of 3 PageID #: 45 2 Of counsel: Angel Mitchell Beth A. Larigan Albert F. Harris SHOOK HARDY & BACON LLP 2555 Grand Blvd. Kansas City, MO 64108 (816) 474-6550 amitchell@shb.com blarigan@shb.com afharris@shb.com Case 1:12-cv-01308-RGA Document 9 Filed 01/09/13 Page 2 of 3 PageID #: 46 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE GRIFFIN TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS INC., Plaintiff, v. CLEARWIRE CORPORATION, Defendant. Civil Action No.: 12-1308 (RGA) [PROPOSED] ORDER Now pending before the Court is Clearwire Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). It is hereby ORDERED that Clearwire’s motion is GRANTED. SO ORDERED THIS __ day of ____________, 2013. ______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE Case 1:12-cv-01308-RGA Document 9 Filed 01/09/13 Page 3 of 3 PageID #: 47