Graham Engineering Corp. v. Slusarz

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

M.D. Pa.February 27, 2017

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GRAHAM ENGINEERING CORP., : Plaintiff : Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-02527-CCC v. : (Honorable Christopher C. Conner) : KEVIN SLUSARZ, : : Defendant : : DEFENDANT KEVIN SLUSARZ’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), defendant Kevin Slusarz (“Defendant”) hereby moves to dismiss the Complaint (Dkt. 1) filed by plaintiff Graham Engineering Corporation in its entirety. The reasons for the instant Motion are set forth in Defendant’s Brief filed contemporaneously herewith. Dated: February 27, 2017 Respectfully submitted, s/ Andrew C. Whitney John V. Gorman (PA 80631) Andrew C. Whitney (PA 201534) MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP 1701 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 T: 215.963.5000 F: 215.963.5001 john.gorman@morganlewis.com andrew.whitney@morganlewis.com Counsel for Defendant Kevin Slusarz Case 1:16-cv-02527-CCC Document 16 Filed 02/27/17 Page 1 of 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA GRAHAM ENGINEERING CORP., : Plaintiff : Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-02527-CCC v. : (Honorable Christopher C. Conner) : KEVIN SLUSARZ, : : Defendant : : [PROPOSED] ORDER AND NOW, this _____ day of _____________ 2017, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED. BY THE COURT: J. Case 1:16-cv-02527-CCC Document 16-1 Filed 02/27/17 Page 1 of 1 LOCAL RULE 7.1 CERTIFICATION Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1, I hereby certify that I sought concurrence from Richard Hackman, Esq., counsel for Plaintiff Graham Engineering Corp., regarding Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint, and that Mr. Hackman declined to concur in said Motion. s/Andrew C. Whitney Andrew C. Whitney Case 1:16-cv-02527-CCC Document 16-2 Filed 02/27/17 Page 1 of 1