Golloher et al v. Todd Christopher International, Inc.

RESPONSE

N.D. Cal.June 23, 2014

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ! Matthew Kurilich California Bar Number 30172 mattkurilich@gmail.com 17321 Irvine BLVD STE 115 Tustin CA 92780 Telephone 714-734-3715 Facsimile 714-734-3716 ! Attorney for Objector Kim Morrison ! ! ! ! UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT   NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA   SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION ! ! ! ANDREA GOLLOHER, MARISA FREEMAN, ROBERTA CHASE, JAMES HANKS, MICHAEL SHAPIRO, BRENDA BROWN, GRETCHEN SWENSON, CRYSTAL KENNY, KELLY BOTTARI, RENEE C O N OV E R , a n d S H A N I S H A SANDERS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, ! Plaintiffs, ! vs. ! T O D D C H R I S T O P H E R I N T E R NAT I O NA L I N C . D BA VOGUE INTERNATIONAL, a Florida Corporation, and DOES 1-100 Case No. 3:12 cv 06002 (RS) " 1 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTOR KIM MORRISON’S OBJECTION TO MOTION TO REQUIRE APPEAL BONDS AND DISCOVERY Case No. 3:12 cv 06002 (RS) !! JUDGE: HON. RICHARD SEEBORG Case 3:12-cv-06002-RS Document 92 Filed 06/23/14 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 OBJECTOR KIM MORRISON’S OBJECTION TO MOTION TO REQUIRE APPEAL BONDS AND DISCOVERY ! PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Objector Kim Morrison (Objector Morrison) joins in the following oppositions to Plaintiffs’ motion to require appeal bonds (Dkt. 85): 1) Appellant Jennifer Cochran’s Opposition filed on June 12, 2014 (Dkt. 89). 2) Appellant Violet Hignite’s Opposition filed on June 18, 2014 (Dkt. 91). Objector Morrison respectfully requests that any relief ordered by the Court relative to these oppositions also be ordered in favor of her as an appellant. Objector Morrison further contends that, to the extent that the Court orders bonding as to the legitimate costs under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 7 (i.e., not for the costs of class administration, but only the anticipated copying costs), any such costs should not require an appeal bond as such is an amount reasonably payable by Objector Morrison. ! ! ! Dated: June 23, 2014 Respectfully Submitted MATTHEW KURILICH /s/ Matthew Kurilich ______________________________ Attorney for Objector and Appellant Kim Morrison !! Case No. 3:12 cv 06002 (RS) " 2 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTOR KIM MORRISON’S OBJECTION TO MOTION TO REQUIRE APPEAL BONDS AND DISCOVERY Case 3:12-cv-06002-RS Document 92 Filed 06/23/14 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ! I hereby certify that a true copy of the above document was served upon the attorney of record for each other party through the Court’s electronic filing service on June 23, 2014. ! MATTHEW KURILICH /s/ Matthew Kurilich ______________________________ Case No. 3:12 cv 06002 (RS) " 3 ___________________________________________________________________________________________________ OBJECTOR KIM MORRISON’S OBJECTION TO MOTION TO REQUIRE APPEAL BONDS AND DISCOVERY Case 3:12-cv-06002-RS Document 92 Filed 06/23/14 Page 3 of 3