9 Cited authorities

  1. Jacobson v. Comcast Corporation

    740 F. Supp. 2d 683 (D. Md. 2010)   Cited 54 times
    Holding that Comcast only exercised power over the hiring and firing of technicians in the context of quality control and such control did not weigh in favor of a joint-employer relationship
  2. Lawrence v. Adderley Indus., Inc.

    CV-09-2309 (SJF)(ETB) (E.D.N.Y. Feb. 11, 2011)   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Granting summary judgment to defendant cable company and finding that defendant did not employ plaintiff technicians, where quality control stemmed from the nature of the cable company's business and was designed partly to protect customers whose homes technicians entered
  3. Matter of Board of Higher Educ. v. Carter

    199 N.E.2d 141 (N.Y. 1964)   Cited 46 times
    In Matter of Board of Educ. of City of N.Y. v. Carter (14 N.Y.2d 138) there were involved alleged discriminatory employment and promotion practices in the Board of Higher Education of the City of New York and the purpose of the State Commission for Human Rights to investigate.
  4. Peluso v. Smith

    142 Misc. 2d 642 (N.Y. Misc. 1989)   Cited 4 times

    February 8, 1989 Hochheiser Aronson (Kenneth J. Aronson of counsel), for petitioner. Peter L. Zimroth, Corporation Counsel (Michele A. Pincus of counsel), for respondents. NORMAN C. RYP, J. A. ISSUE Whether a former felon, with a certificate of relief from disability, is entitled to any procedural due process before a New York City municipal agency's denial of license, and to the presumption of rehabilitation under article 23-A of the Correction Law. In this CPLR article 78 proceeding petitioner

  5. Section 752 - Unfair discrimination against persons previously convicted of one or more criminal offenses prohibited

    N.Y. Correct. Law § 752   Cited 183 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting the denial of employment unless there is a “direct relationship” to the offense of conviction or “the employment would involve an unreasonable risk to property or to the safety or welfare of specific individuals or the general public”
  6. Section 753 - Factors to be considered concerning a previous criminal conviction; presumption

    N.Y. Correct. Law § 753   Cited 134 times   2 Legal Analyses

    1. In making a determination pursuant to section seven hundred fifty-two of this chapter, the public agency or private employer shall consider the following factors: (a) The public policy of this state, as expressed in this act, to encourage the licensure and employment of persons previously convicted of one or more criminal offenses. (b) The specific duties and responsibilities necessarily related to the license or employment sought or held by the person. (c) The bearing, if any, the criminal offense

  7. Section 750 - Definitions

    N.Y. Correct. Law § 750   Cited 68 times

    For the purposes of this article, the following terms shall have the following meanings: (1) "Public agency" means the state or any local subdivision thereof, or any state or local department, agency, board or commission. (2) "Private employer" means any person, company, corporation, labor organization or association which employs ten or more persons. (3) "Direct relationship" means that the nature of criminal conduct for which the person was convicted has a direct bearing on his fitness or ability

  8. Section 13907 - Household goods agents

    49 U.S.C. § 13907   Cited 30 times

    (a) CARRIERS RESPONSIBLE FOR AGENTS.-Each motor carrier providing transportation of household goods shall be responsible for all acts or omissions of any of its agents which relate to the performance of household goods transportation services (including accessorial or terminal services) and which are within the actual or apparent authority of the agent from the carrier or which are ratified by the carrier. (b) STANDARD FOR SELECTING AGENTS.-Each motor carrier providing transportation of household

  9. § 375.205 May I have agents?

    49 C.F.R. § 375.205

    (a) You may have agents provided you comply with paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section. A household goods agent is defined as either one of the following two types of agents: (1) A prime agent provides a transportation service for you or on your behalf, including the selling of, or arranging for, a transportation service. You permit or require the agent to provide services under the terms of an agreement or arrangement with you. A prime agent does not provide services on an emergency or temporary