§Why CasetextPricing

Greater New York Taxi Association, et al., Appellants,v.New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission,, et al., Respondents, Nissan Taxi Marketing, N.A., LLC., et al., Intervenors-Respondents.

Brief

10 Cited authorities

  1. Boreali v. Axelrod

    71 N.Y.2d 1 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 243 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Finding proper balance between health concerns and cost "is a uniquely legislative function"

  2. Matter of Levine v. Whalen

    39 N.Y.2d 510 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 146 times
    Holding that the standard provided in a public health law, “ ‘to provide for the protection and promotion of the health of the inhabitants of the state,’ is not so vague and indefinite as to set no standard or to outline no policy”

  3. City of New York v. State of New York Commission on Cable Television

    47 N.Y.2d 89 (N.Y. 1979)   Cited 67 times

    Argued March 29, 1979 Decided May 8, 1979 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, HAROLD J. HUGHES, J. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Peter J. Dooley and Jeremiah Jochnowitz of counsel), for appellant. Allen G. Schwartz, Corporation Counsel (Nancy Stassinopoulos, L. Kevin Sheridan and Stephen P. Kramer of counsel), for respondent. Chief Judge COOKE. Petitioner, the City of New York, in 1970 granted two franchises providing for the operation of cable

  4. N.Y. Statewide Coal. Hispanic Chambers of Commerce v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Health & Mental Hygiene

    110 A.D.3d 1 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 16 times

    2013-07-30 In re NEW YORK STATEWIDE COALITION OF HISPANIC CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE, et al., Petitioners–Respondents, v. The NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE, et al., Respondents–Appellants. The National Alliance for Hispanic Health, The National Congress of Black Women, Inc., The New York Chapter of the National Association of Hispanic Nurses, Maya Rockeymoore, Ph.D., Montefiore Medical Center, The Mount Sinai Medical Center, The New York State American Academy of Pediatrics, District

  5. N.Y. Statewide Coal. of Hispanic Chambers of Commerce v. N.Y.C. Dep't of Health & Mental Hygiene

    2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 4804 (N.Y. 2014)   Cited 14 times

    No. 134 06-26-2014 In the Matter of NEW YORK STATEWIDE COALITION OF HISPANIC CHAMBERS OF COMMERCE, et al., Respondents, v. The NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND MENTAL HYGIENE, et al., Appellants. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Richard Dearing, Fay Ng, Leonard J. Koerner, Pamela Seider Dolgow, Mark Muschenheim, Jasmine M. Georges, Spencer Fisher, Zachary W. Carter and Trevor D. Lippman of counsel), for appellants. Latham & Watkins LLP (Richard P. Bress, of the District

  6. Black Car Assistance Corp. v. City of N.Y.

    110 A.D.3d 618 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 7 times

    2013-10-29 In re BLACK CAR ASSISTANCE CORPORATION, et al., Petitioners–Appellants, v. The CITY OF NEW YORK, et al., Respondents–Respondents, Metropolitan Taxicab Board of Trade, et al., Intervenor–Respondents–Respondents. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, New York (Randy M. Mastro of counsel), for appellants. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Ronald E. Sternberg of counsel), for respondents. FRIEDMAN Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, New York (Randy M. Mastro of counsel), for appellants. Michael

  7. Greater N.Y. Taxi Ass'n v.

    40 Misc. 3d 1062 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2013)   Cited 5 times

    2013-07-11 GREATER NEW YORK TAXI ASSOCIATION and Evgeny Freidman, Petitioners, v. The NEW YORK CITY TAXI AND LIMOUSINE COMMISSION, a Charter Mandated Agency, and David Yassky, in his capacity as the Chairman of the New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission, Respondents. Mintz & Gold LLP (Steven G. Mintz of counsel) for petitioners. Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel (Karen Selvin of counsel), for respondents. ALEXANDER W. HUNTER JR. Mintz & Gold LLP (Steven G. Mintz of counsel) for petitioners

  8. Matter of Com. for Taxi S. v. Taxi L. Com

    256 A.D.2d 136 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)   Cited 15 times
    Upholding financial disclosure requirements promulgated by TLC for medallion taxicab owners because the regulations reasonably furthered the "governmental purpose of assuring sufficient information to identify taxicab owners who have abused the corporate form by fragmenting their ownership into many undercapitalized corporations in order to shield assets from persons injured as a result of a taxicab's negligence"

  9. Moore v. Board of Regents

    44 N.Y.2d 593 (N.Y. 1978)   Cited 15 times

    Argued May 1, 1978 Decided June 13, 1978 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, HAROLD J. HUGHES, J. Walter J. Relihan, Jr., for the State University of New York, appellant. Robert D. Stone and Donald O. Meserve for respondents. Thomas Laverne for Commission on Independent Colleges and Universities, amicus curiae. JASEN, J. Presented for our review on this appeal is the issue whether the Board of Regents, through the Commissioner of Education, has

  10. Pavle-Marty Cab Corp. v. City of New York

    48 N.Y.2d 784 (N.Y. 1979)   Cited 2 times

    Argued October 17, 1979 Decided November 15, 1979 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, HAROLD BAER, J. Alan B. Decker for appellants. Allen G. Schwartz, Corporation Counsel (Joel A. Newman and L. Kevin Sheridan of counsel), for respondents. MEMORANDUM. The order appealed from should be affirmed, with costs. While it is beyond cavil that "the Legislature cannot delegate its lawmaking power to an administrative agency", it is equally true that "the