Evoqua Water Technologies Llc v. M.W. Watermark, Llc et alMOTION for summary judgmentW.D. Mich.December 5, 20161 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION EVOQUA WATER TECHNOLOGIES LLC Plaintiff, v. M.W. WATERMARK, LLC; MICHAEL GETHIN, individually; DANIEL JANISSE, individually; PAUL MALIK, individually, ANDREW HAGEN, individually, DAVID HIGGINS, individually, and JAMES DRIESENGA, individually Defendants. Case No. 1:16-cv-00014-RHB-RSK Hon. Robert Holmes Bell DEFENDANT ANDREW HAGEN’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 56(A) Defendant Andrew Hagen, by his attorneys of record, hereby moves for Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a) for entry of an order granting judgment in his favor on Counts III, VI, and VII of the First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 55). The bases for Mr. Hagen’s motion are set forth in the accompanying brief and exhibits thereto. Case 1:16-cv-00014-RHB-RSK ECF No. 93 filed 12/05/16 PageID.6183 Page 1 of 2 2 Respectfully submitted, Date: December 5, 2016 By: /s/ G. Thomas Williams G. Thomas Williams (P53734) Attorneys for Defendants MCGARRY BAIR PC 32 Market Ave SW, Suite 500 Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503 Tel: (616) 742-3500 Fax: (616) 742-1010 G1081448.DOCX Case 1:16-cv-00014-RHB-RSK ECF No. 93 filed 12/05/16 PageID.6184 Page 2 of 2
