Envisiontec, Inc. v. Formlabs, Inc.

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Dismiss Case Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12

C.D. Cal.December 12, 2016

MOTION TO DISMISS Case No. 2:16-cv-06812-RSWL-RAO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Michael A. Albert; malbert@wolfgreenfield.com (Admitted pro hac vice) Nathan Speed; nspeed@wolfgreenfield.com (Admitted pro hac vice) WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C. 600 Atlantic Avenue Boston, MA 02210 T: (617) 646-8000; F: (617) 646-8646 Jo Dale Carothers (SBN 228703) Email: jcarothers@weintraub.com Eric Caligiuri (SBN 260442) Email: ecaligiuri@weintraub.com WEINTRAUB TOBIN CHEDIAK COLEMAN GRODIN LAW CORPORATION 23 Corporate Plaza, Suite 200 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Telephone: (949) 760-0204 Facsimile: (949) 760-2507 Attorneys for Defendant Formlabs, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ENVISIONTEC, INC. Plaintiff, vs. FORMLABS, INC. Defendant. Case No.: 2:16-cv-06812-RSWL-RAO NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(6) Hearing Date: January 17, 2017 Time: 10:00 am Judge: Hon. Ronald S.W. Lew Courtroom: 21 Case 2:16-cv-06812-RSWL-RAO Document 30 Filed 12/12/16 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:104 1 MOTION TO DISMISS Case No. 2:16-cv-06812-RSWL-RAO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TO PLAINTIFF AND ITS ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on January 17, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., or as soon as counsel may be heard by the above-entitled Court, located at 312 North Spring Street, Courtroom No. 21, Los Angeles, CA 90012, Defendant Formlabs Inc. will move this Court to dismiss the Amended Complaint in its entirety pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. This motion is based upon the Memorandum of Points and Authorities, all pleadings, papers and files herein, and such further arguments and evidence that are presented at or before or after the hearing on this matter. This motion is made following the conference of counsel pursuant to L.R. 7-3. The parties intend to further discuss whether there may be ways to narrow or resolve the dispute, but, absent such agreement, EnvisionTEC intends to oppose this motion. Dated: December 12, 2016 Respectfully Submitted, /s/ Michael Albert Michael A. Albert, Pro Hac Vice malbert@wolfgreenfield.com Nathan Speed, Pro Hac Vice nspeed@wolfgreenfield.com WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C. 600 Atlantic Avenue Boston, Massachusetts 02210 (617) 646-8000 Phone (617) 646-8646 FAX Attorney for Defendant Formlabs, Inc. Case 2:16-cv-06812-RSWL-RAO Document 30 Filed 12/12/16 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:105 [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 2:16-cv-06812-RSWL-RAO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Michael A. Albert; malbert@wolfgreenfield.com (Admitted pro hac vice) Nathan Speed; nspeed@wolfgreenfield.com (Admitted pro hac vice) WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C. 600 Atlantic Avenue Boston, MA 02210 T: (617) 646-8000; F: (617) 646-8646 Jo Dale Carothers (SBN 228703) Email: jcarothers@weintraub.com Eric Caligiuri (SBN 260442) Email: ecaligiuri@weintraub.com WEINTRAUB TOBIN CHEDIAK COLEMAN GRODIN LAW CORPORATION 23 Corporate Plaza, Suite 200 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Telephone: (949) 760-0204 Facsimile: (949) 760-2507 Attorneys for Defendant Formlabs, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ENVISIONTEC, INC. Plaintiff, vs. FORMLABS, INC. Defendant. Case No.: 2:16-cv-06812-RSWL-RAO [PROPOSED] ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 12(B)(6) Hearing Date: January 17, 2017 Time: 10:00 am Judge: Hon. Ronald S.W. Lew Courtroom: 21 Case 2:16-cv-06812-RSWL-RAO Document 30-1 Filed 12/12/16 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:106 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No. 2:16-cv-06812-RSWL-RAO 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [Proposed] Order on Motion to Dismiss On December 12, 2016, Formlabs, Inc. filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and a Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support thereof. The Court, having considered the Motion to Dismiss, Plaintiff’s Opposition, Defendants’ Reply, any oral argument, and good cause appearing, hereby GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Therefore, it is ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion be GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. DATED: _______________ _______________________________ Hon. Ronald S.W. Lew United States District Judge Case 2:16-cv-06812-RSWL-RAO Document 30-1 Filed 12/12/16 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:107