Finding a policy that provided UM/UIM benefits only for certain vehicles under the policy invalid because the court found that § 10-4-609 is not a vehicle-specific law, but rather a statute that deals in terms coverage for individuals
Holding that, because insurer was not obligated to provide information regarding other types of coverage, it did not commit negligent misrepresentation by omission by failing to disclose facts concerning the coverage of additional insurance
Requiring an automobile liability insurance policy to include coverage for "damages from owners or operators of uninsured motor vehicles . . . except that the named insured may reject such coverage in writing"