8 Cited authorities

  1. Cyprus Amax Minerals v. Lexington

    74 P.3d 294 (Colo. 2003)   Cited 227 times
    Holding that "property damage" included expenses incurred to repair geological problems at a mine purchased from the insured
  2. Compass Ins. Co. v. City of Littleton

    984 P.2d 606 (Colo. 1999)   Cited 186 times
    Holding that the relevant pollution event is "the release of pollutants from a containment area"
  3. Allen v. Pacheco

    71 P.3d 375 (Colo. 2003)   Cited 95 times
    Holding that wrongful-death claim was required to be arbitrated under decedent's arbitration agreement even though claim was independent in nature
  4. DeHerrera, v. Sentry Ins. Co.

    30 P.3d 167 (Colo. 2001)   Cited 65 times
    Finding a policy that provided UM/UIM benefits only for certain vehicles under the policy invalid because the court found that § 10-4-609 is not a vehicle-specific law, but rather a statute that deals in terms coverage for individuals
  5. Apodaca v. Allstate Ins. Co.

    255 P.3d 1099 (Colo. 2011)   Cited 17 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Rejecting the distinction because it oversimplifies UIM statutes
  6. Mullen v. Allstate Insurance Co.

    232 P.3d 168 (Colo. App. 2009)   Cited 10 times
    Holding that, because insurer was not obligated to provide information regarding other types of coverage, it did not commit negligent misrepresentation by omission by failing to disclose facts concerning the coverage of additional insurance
  7. Snell v. Progressive Preferred Ins. Co.

    260 P.3d 37 (Colo. App. 2010)   Cited 8 times
    Noting amendments to § 10-4-609 applied to policies issued or renewed on or after effective date of act
  8. Section 10-4-609 - Insurance protection against uninsured motorists - applicability

    Colo. Rev. Stat. § 10-4-609   Cited 140 times
    Requiring an automobile liability insurance policy to include coverage for "damages from owners or operators of uninsured motor vehicles . . . except that the named insured may reject such coverage in writing"