§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Steam Pipe Explosion at 41st Street and Lexington Avenue.---------------------------------Carrie Tassa, Plaintiff,v.Consolidated Edison Inc., et al., Respondents, Team Industrial Services, Inc., Appellant, City of New York, Defendant. (And Other Actions.)--------------------------------Consolidated Edison Inc., et al., Third-Party Respondents, v. Team Industrial Services, Inc., Third-Party Appellant.

Brief

6 Cited authorities

  1. Allen v. Crowell-Collier Pub. Co.

    21 N.Y.2d 403 (N.Y. 1968)   Cited 1,968 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he words, "material and necessary", are . . . to be interpreted liberally to require disclosure, upon request, of any facts bearing on the controversy which will assist preparation for trial by sharpening the issues and reducing delay and prolixity"

  2. Yoshida v. Hsueh–Chih Chin

    111 A.D.3d 704 (N.Y. App. Div. 2013)   Cited 28 times

    2013-11-13 Atsushi YOSHIDA, plaintiff, v. HSUEH–CHIH CHIN, etc., appellant, Nihon Medical Group, P.C., defendant-respondent; James Tachibana, etc., et al., nonparty-respondents. LEONARD B. AUSTIN Marian Polovy, New York, N.Y. (John C. Hunt of counsel), for appellant. , J.P., SANDRA L. SGROI, JEFFREY A. COHEN, and SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, JJ. In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant Hsueh–Chih Chin appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order

  3. Hyde v. County of Rensselaer, Niagara Mohawk Power

    51 N.Y.2d 927 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 87 times
    Holding that "It is well settled that proof of a prior accident, whether offered as proof of the existence of a dangerous condition or as proof of notice thereof, is admissible only upon a showing that the relevant conditions of the subject accident and the previous one were substantially the same"

  4. Seaman v. Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Inc.

    25 A.D.3d 598 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)   Cited 17 times

    2005-03542. January 17, 2006. In an action to recover damages for violation of Labor Law § 740, the plaintiff and the nonparties Joseph R. Gagliano, Jr., Law Firm of Joseph R. Gagliano, Jr., Andrew P. Karamouzis, and Moran D'Arcambal, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Davis, J.), entered April 1, 2005, which, after hearings, granted those branches of the defendant's oral application which were pursuant to CPLR 3103 for a protective order, and pursuant to 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 to

  5. People v. Olson

    878 N.E.2d 999 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 6 times

    No. 134. Argued October 10, 2007. Decided November 15, 2007. APPEAL, by permission of an Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, entered December 26, 2006. The Appellate Division affirmed a judgment of THE Supreme Court, Nassau County (Jerald S. Carter, J), which had convicted defendant, after a nonjury trial, of assault in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree. People

  6. Herbert v. Sivaco Wire Corp.

    289 A.D.2d 71 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)   Cited 1 times

    5577 December 11, 2001. Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Giamboi J.), entered on or about May 11, 2001, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff's motion to strike the answer of defendant Sivaco Wire Corporation if defendant did not comply with prior discovery orders and directed Sivaco to produce the entire contents of its customer complaint files on or before June 11, 2001, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Steven J. Popkin, for plaintiff-respondent. Cynthia Holfester-neugebauer, for defendant-appellant