48 Cited authorities

  1. Klostermann v. Cuomo

    61 N.Y.2d 525 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 380 times
    In Klostermann, the public agencies involved were in repeated noncompliance with the command of Mental Hygiene Law § 29.15 (g), which required preparation of a written service plan, with prescribed contents, for every person discharged from state psychiatric hospitals.
  2. Silver v. Pataki

    96 N.Y.2d 532 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 129 times
    Holding that individual legislator had standing to sue governor regarding the constitutionality of his vetoes, despite the legislature's not attempting to override the vetoes
  3. City of New York v. State

    86 N.Y.2d 286 (N.Y. 1995)   Cited 105 times
    Observing "extreme reluctance of courts to intrude in the political relationships between the Legislature, the State and its governmental subdivisions"
  4. Matter of Hodes v. Axelrod

    70 N.Y.2d 364 (N.Y. 1987)   Cited 116 times
    Holding that the application of an amended statute permitting the revocation of a nursing home operating certificate based on an operator's industry-related felony convictions does not impair the operator's vested rights, even though the operator had successfully litigated the automatic revocation under the preexisting law
  5. Rhem v. Malcolm

    507 F.2d 333 (2d Cir. 1974)   Cited 155 times
    Holding that the imposition of maximum security confinement, including lock-ins that lasted 16 hours per day, violated the due process rights of some pre-trial detainees
  6. Town of Oyster Bay v. Kirkland

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 6988 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 44 times

    2012-10-18 TOWN OF OYSTER BAY, Appellant, v. Galen D. KIRKLAND, as Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights, et al., Respondents. Giaimo Associates, LLP, Kew Gardens (Joseph D. Giaimo of counsel), for appellant. Caroline J. Downey, General Counsel, Bronx (Michael K. Swirsky of counsel), for respondents. Giaimo Associates, LLP, Kew Gardens (Joseph D. Giaimo of counsel), for appellant. Caroline J. Downey, General Counsel, Bronx (Michael K. Swirsky of counsel), for respondents. OPINION

  7. Brothers v. Florence

    95 N.Y.2d 290 (N.Y. 2000)   Cited 62 times
    Holding that it was unreasonable to apply an amended statute of limitations that shortened the time in which to file medical-malpractice claims to a suit that, upon passage of the new statute of limitations, was to be filed within four months rather than within the significantly longer time under the old statute, given the diligent pursuit of the claim by the plaintiff from the time of accrual
  8. James Square Assocs. LP v. Mullen

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 3935 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 32 times
    In James Sq., the Court concluded that a retroactive period of 16 months “should be considered excessive and weighs against the State” (21 N.Y.3d at 249, 970 N.Y.S.2d 888, 993 N.E.2d 374).
  9. Barenboim v. S, V. Starbucks Corp.

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 4754 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 29 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the New York State Department of Labor's interpretation of the NYLL is entitled to deference
  10. Board of Education v. Nyquist

    57 N.Y.2d 27 (N.Y. 1982)   Cited 83 times
    Holding New York's school financing system does not violate the State or Federal Constitution