51 Cited authorities

  1. Atkins v. Parker

    472 U.S. 115 (1985)   Cited 306 times
    Holding food stamp benefits are property protected by the Due Process Clause
  2. Breed v. Ins. Co. of N. Amer

    46 N.Y.2d 351 (N.Y. 1978)   Cited 813 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that no ambiguity exists where language has "definite and precise meaning, unattended by danger of misconception in the purport of the policy itself, and concerning which there is no reasonable basis for a difference of opinion"
  3. Zumpano v. Quinn

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 1245 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 318 times
    Holding that a party must establish "subsequent and specific actions by defendants somehow kept them from timely bringing suit"
  4. In re Best Payphones v. Dept. of Info. Tech.

    5 N.Y.3d 30 (N.Y. 2005)   Cited 197 times

    90. Argued April 27, 2005. Decided June 9, 2005. APPEAL, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, entered November 24, 2003. The Appellate Division affirmed so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (David B. Vaughan, J.), entered in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of respondent that denied petitioner a public payphone franchise, as

  5. Solnick v. Whalen

    49 N.Y.2d 224 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 382 times
    Holding that the plaintiffs could challenge the downward revision of their Medicaid reimbursement rates in “a proceeding instituted pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review the determination made by the State agency.”
  6. New York Health and Hosp. Corp. v. McBarnette

    84 N.Y.2d 194 (N.Y. 1994)   Cited 187 times
    In NewYork City Health & Hosps. Corp. v McBarnette, (84 NY2d 194, 199 [1994], rearg denied 84 NY2d 865 [1994]), an analogous and controlling case, plaintiff commenced a declaratory judgment action against government agencies that administer the Medicaid program to challenge the manner in which hospitals are reimbursed for services provided to patients.
  7. Nassau Insurance Company v. Murray

    46 N.Y.2d 828 (N.Y. 1978)   Cited 276 times
    In Nassau Insurance Company v. Murray, 46 NY2d 828 (1978), the court held that where proof shows that a certain office mailing procedure was followed, a presumption arises that the mailed items were received.
  8. John J. Kassner & Co. v. City of New York

    46 N.Y.2d 544 (N.Y. 1979)   Cited 274 times
    Holding that "the cause of action accrues and the Statute of Limitations begins to run from the time of the breach" of a contract
  9. Council of Teachers v. Boces

    63 N.Y.2d 100 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 136 times

    Decided September 20, 1984 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Bernard McCaffrey, J. Stanley A. Immerman for appellant. Seymour H. Kligler for Board of Cooperative Educational Services of Nassau County, respondent. MEYER, J. When the respondent in an article 78 proceeding challenges petitioner's standing only, it is error to dismiss the petition on the merits prior to service of respondent's answer. The mandate of CPLR 7804 (subd [f]) that, "If

  10. John v. Portville Central Sch. Dist

    2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 2645 (N.Y. 2009)   Cited 63 times
    Instructing courts to read contracts as a whole and not place “undue emphasis” upon particular words or phrases
  11. § 982.552 PHA denial or termination of assistance for family

    24 C.F.R. § 982.552   Cited 210 times
    Granting agency discretion to consider extent of participation or culpability of individual family members and exclude only specific parties who break section 8 rules
  12. § 982.555 Informal hearing for participant

    24 C.F.R. § 982.555   Cited 190 times
    Providing limited rights to prehearing discovery
  13. § 982.551 Obligations of participant

    24 C.F.R. § 982.551   Cited 186 times
    Requiring tenant to submit "true and complete" income information as requested by the public housing agency
  14. § 982.401 Housing quality standards (HQS)

    24 C.F.R. § 982.401   Cited 75 times
    Stating "the housing quality standards . . . for housing assisted" through the Section 8 program
  15. § 982.305 PHA approval of assisted tenancy

    24 C.F.R. § 982.305   Cited 43 times
    Stating that before the lease term commences "[t]he landlord and the tenant [must] have executed the lease (including the HUD-prescribed tenancy addendum[.]")
  16. § 982.451 Housing assistance payments contract

    24 C.F.R. § 982.451   Cited 35 times
    Providing that housing authority that fails to make timely payment to landlord is subject to late fees in accordance with state or local law
  17. § 982.308 Lease and tenancy

    24 C.F.R. § 982.308   Cited 30 times
    Describing lease requirements
  18. § 982.405 PHA initial and periodic unit inspection

    24 C.F.R. § 982.405   Cited 28 times

    (a) The PHA must inspect the unit leased to a family prior to the initial term of the lease, at least biennially during assisted occupancy, and at other times as needed, to determine if the unit meets the HQS. (See § 982.305(b)(2) concerning timing of initial inspection by the PHA.) (b) The PHA must conduct supervisory quality control HQS inspections. (c) In scheduling inspections, the PHA must consider complaints and any other information brought to the attention of the PHA. (d) The PHA must notify

  19. § 982.311 When assistance is paid

    24 C.F.R. § 982.311   Cited 26 times
    Requiring a PHA to continue to make HAP payments "in accordance with the HAP contract" to an owner seeking to evict a tenant "until the owner has obtained a court judgment or other process allowing the owner to evict the tenant"
  20. § 982.455 Automatic termination of HAP contract

    24 C.F.R. § 982.455   Cited 7 times

    The HAP contract terminates automatically 180 calendar days after the last housing assistance payment to the owner. [64 FR 26647, May 14, 1999]