notice of related caseCal. Super. - 1st Dist.September 27, 2021c. Court: same as above CM-015 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: Form Approved for Optional Use Judicial Council of California CM-015 [Rev. July 1, 2007] NOTICE OF RELATED CASE Cal. Rules of Court, rule 3.300www.courtinfo.ca.gov ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): NOTICE OF RELATED CASE FOR COURT USE ONLY STREET ADDRESS: MAILING ADDRESS: CITY AND ZIP CODE: BRANCH NAME: TELEPHONE NO.: E-MAIL ADDRESS (Optional): ATTORNEY FOR (Name): CASE NUMBER: JUDICIAL OFFICER: FAX NO. (Optional): DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: DEPT.: Identify, in chronological order according to date of filing, all cases related to the case referenced above. 2. 1. a. Title: b. Case number: d. Department: e. Case type: f. Filing date: h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): Additional explanation is attached in attachment 1h Page 1 of 3 other state or federal court (name and address): limited civil unlimited civil probate family law other (specify): g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" Yes No involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. i. Status of case: pending dismissed with without prejudice disposed of by judgment c. Court: same as above a. Title: b. Case number: other state or federal court (name and address): d. Department: Angela Starks City and County of San Francisco, et al. CGC-20-588155 Unassigned (Master Calendar) Angela Johnson v. City and County of San Francisco, et al. CGC-21-592213 Unassigned (Master Calendar) May 26, 2021 ELECTRONICALLY F I L E D Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco 07/06/2021 Clerk of the Court BY: EDNALEEN ALEGRE Deputy Clerk PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: CASE NUMBER: DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: CM-015 NOTICE OF RELATED CASECM-015 [Rev. July 1, 2007] Page 2 of 3 3. Date: (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY OR ATTORNEY) c. Court: same as above a. Title: b. Case number: d. Department: e. Case type: f. Filing date: h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): Additional explanation is attached in attachment 3h other state or federal court (name and address): limited civil unlimited civil probate family law other (specify): g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" Yes No involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. i. Status of case: pending dismissed with without prejudice disposed of by judgment 2. (continued) e. Case type: f. Filing date: h. Relationship of this case to the case referenced above (check all that apply): Additional explanation is attached in attachment 2h limited civil unlimited civil probate family law other (specify): g. Has this case been designated or determined as "complex?" Yes No involves the same parties and is based on the same or similar claims. arises from the same or substantially identical transactions, incidents, or events requiring the determination of the same or substantially identical questions of law or fact. involves claims against, title to, possession of, or damages to the same property. is likely for other reasons to require substantial duplication of judicial resources if heard by different judges. i. Status of case: pending dismissed with without prejudice disposed of by judgment 4. Additional related cases are described in Attachment 4. Number of pages attached: ______ Angela Starks City and County of San Francisco, et al. CGC-20-588155 July 6, 2021 Taylor J. Pohle, Esq. (SBN 299794) PLAINTIFF/PETITIONER: CASE NUMBER: PROOF OF SERVICE BY FIRST-CLASS MAIL I served a copy of the Notice of Related Case by enclosing it in a sealed envelope with first-class postage fully prepaid and (check one): I am at least 18 years old and not a party to this action. I am a resident of or employed in the county where the mailing took place, and my residence or business address is (specify): NOTICE OF RELATED CASE The Notice of Related Case was mailed: I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Date: (TYPE OR PRINT NAME OF DECLARANT) (SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT) NOTICE OF RELATED CASECM-015 [Rev. July 1, 2007] 3. a. b. placed the sealed envelope for collection and processing for mailing, following this business's usual practices, with which I am readily familiar. On the same day correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service. DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT: 1. 2. deposited the sealed envelope with the United States Postal Service. (NOTE: You cannot serve the Notice of Related Case if you are a party in the action. The person who served the notice must complete this proof of service. The notice must be served on all known parties in each related action or proceeding.) from (city and state):b. a. on (date): The envelope was addressed and mailed as follows:4. a. Name of person served: Street address: City: State and zip code: c. Name of person served: Street address: City: State and zip code: b. Name of person served: Street address: City: State and zip code: d. Name of person served: Street address: City: State and zip code: Names and addresses of additional persons served are attached. (You may use form POS-030(P).) CM-015 Page 3 of 3 Angela Starks City and County of San Francisco, et al. CGC-20-588155 PROOF OF SERVICE (CCP §§ 1013(a) and 2015.5; FRCP 5) State of California, ) ) ss. County of San Bernardino. ) I am employed in the County of San Bernardino. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 10681 Foothill Boulevard, Suite 260, Rancho Cucamonga, California 91730. On this date, I served the foregoing document described as NOTICE OF RELATED CASE on the interested parties in this action by placing same in a sealed envelope, addressed as follows: SEE ATTATCHED SERVICE LIST (BY MAIL) - I caused such envelope(s) with postage thereon fully prepaid to be placed in the United States mail in Rancho Cucamonga, California to be served on the parties as indicated on the attached service list. I am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice, it would be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Rancho Cucamonga, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. (BY CERTIFIED MAIL) - I caused such envelope(s) with postage thereon fully prepaid via Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested to be placed in the United States Mail in Rancho Cucamonga, California. FEDERAL EXPRESS - I caused the envelope to be delivered to an authorized courier or driver authorized to receive documents with delivery fees provided for. (BY ELECTRONIC FILING AND/OR SERVICE) - I served a true copy, with all exhibits, electronically on designated recipients listed on the attached service list. (ELECTRONIC SERVICE PER CODE CIV. PROC., § 1010.6) - By prior consent or request or as required by rules of court (Code Civ. Proc., § 1010.6 (amended Jan. 1, 2021); Code Civ. Proc., § 1013(g); Cal. Rules of Court, rule 2.251(a)). (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) - I caused such envelope(s) to be delivered by hand to the office(s) of the addressee(s). Executed on July 6, 2021 at Rancho Cucamonga, California. (STATE) - I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the above is true and correct. (FEDERAL) - I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. DENISE WELCH dwelch@ccllp.law ANGELA STARKS v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, et al. San Francisco County Superior Court Case Number: CGC-20-588155 CCCLP File Number: 22847 SERVICE LIST Brian L. Larsen, Esq. Joseph Lee, Esq. Has S. Jawandha, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF BRIAN L. LARSEN 530 Jackson Street, Second Floor San Francisco, CA 94133 Tel: (415) 398-5000 blarsen5000@gmail.com ATTORNEYS FOR Plaintiff ANGELA STARKS Dennis J. Herrera,City Attorney Meredith B. Osborn, Chief Trial Deputy Sabrina M. Berdux, Deputy City Attorney Fox Plaza 1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor San Francisco, CA 94102-5408 Tel: (415) 554-3929 - Fax: (415) 554-3837 sabrina.m.berdux@sfcityatty.org ATTORNEYS FOR Defendant CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Paul A. Matiasic, Esq. Hannah E. Mohr, Esq. THE MATIASIC FIRM, P.C. 4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 1400 San Francisco, CA 94111 Tel: (415) 675-1089 - Fax: (415) 675-1103 matiasic@mjlawoffice.com hmohr@mjlawoffice.com ATTORNEYS FOR Plaintiff ANGELA JOHNSON, Individually and as Successor-in- Interest to ANGELIQUE STARKS, Deceased [Case No. CGC-21-592213]