notice of entry of order

Cal. Super. - 1st Dist.October 14, 2021

1 2 3 4 5 Randolph S. Hicks, Esq. - SBN 83627 Daniel Shevtsov, Esq. - SBN 299971 CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH A Professional Corporation, Lawyers 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 300 Redwood City, CA 94065-2133 Telephone: 650.592.5400 Facsunile: 650.592.5027 ATTORNEYS FOR Defendants 6 Joshua Westbrook and David Westbrook 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO MOHAMMED ALSAEDI and FARQAD MAHDI OBAYES, Plaintiffs, vs. JOSHUA WESTBROOK, DAVID WESTBROOK and DOES 1-10, Defendants, Case No. CGC-20-585130 NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER 20 TO: PLAINTIFFS AND TO THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 21 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that attached hereto is a true and correct copy of the court's 22 Order Granting Ex Parte Application to Continue Trial and Trial-Related Dates Based on 23 Stipulation of the Parties, which order was signed and filed on June 2, 2021. 24 Dated: June 3, 2021 25 26 27 28 Notice of Entry of Order Case No: CGC-20-585130 CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH I~,,/ the Court heard Defendants Joshua Westbrook and David Westbrook's (collectively "Defendants") Ex Porte Application to Continue the Trial Date based on the Stipulation of the Parties. Daniel Shevtsov appeared on behalf of Defendants. There is no opposition from plain~ff. After considering the ex parte application, the stipulation· of the parties, and the declaration of Daniel Shevtsov, the Court GRANTS the application, as follows: Good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: f.Pwpos~l Order Granting Ex Parte Application t.o Continue Trial and Trial-Related Dates Case No: CGC-20-585130 775529 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 and 1. 2. The trial of this matter set for August 2, 2021, is continued. "- + Cf: 3 6 Gt~ ~"1. t>~ p+'7-(!)6 The trial is continued to [November 8, 2021} gr [ ________ , ~]; 3. All trial-related dates, discovery and expert witness cutoff deadlines (including ~ t ,?,,CA~ca,. expert disclosure) shall be based off the ft@l?iT 1tiaJ ga~@ IT IS SO ORDERED. SEE NEXT PAGE 8 Dated: ________ _ By . . . . .. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Honorable Judge of the Superior Court 2 (Il!opaseell Order Granting Ex Parte Application to Continue Trial and Trial-Related Dates Case No: CGC-20-585130 775529 I j l 1 THE COURT-FURTHER ORDERS ALL PARTIES to calJ 415-551-3685 qr e-maii the . 2 . c~urt at Departm"ent206@sftc.~rg seven to fourteen' days before the.trial date and .. 3 provide the following information; 4 5 · 6 7 8 9 · 10 11 12 13 14 1. Party Name and Attorney Name (if represented) 2. Case Name arid Number 3. Trial date and- estimate ~f total trial time (including motions in limine and jury selection) 4. Are you interested in a settlement conference on the "day oftri.al? · , · . . ' . . 5. · Provide a brief tjescription of the case, including damages. rf calling, description is limited to three minutes or less. : 6. If the c·ase has settled, is this a global settleme.nt as to all parties and all causes of action, and is the settlement conditional or unconditional? Parties must appear onthe·day of trial unless a Dismissal, N<:Jtice·of Settlement, lS or Notice of Stay is filed with ~ourtesy cop_ies delivered to Depprt~ent 206 by 4:00 PM 16 on the Thursday before trial. 17 If the trial date is conti~ued, this order applies t~ the ne"V trial date. Failure to . . . 18 comply wJth this order rriay resµlt in monetary sanctip.ns, C.C.P. §177.5. 19 20 21 22 . 2°3 24 ·. 25 26 27 28 DATE: ,: JUN O 2 .. 2021 HONORABLE SAMUEL K. FENG Presiding Judge San Fraocisco Superior Court . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 PROOF OF SERVICE California Code of Civil Procedure sections 1011, 1013, 1013a, 2015.5 California Rule of Court rule 2.251 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 5(b) I, the undersigned, declare that I am employed in the County of San Mateo, State of California. I am over the age of eighteen (18) years and not a party to the within action. My business address is 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 300, Redwood City, California 94065. My electronic mail address is Eva@chdlawyers.com. I am readily familiar with my employer's business practice for collection and processing of correspondence and documents for mailing with the United States Postal Service, mailing via overnight delivery, transmission by facsimile machine, and delivery by hand. On June 3, 2021, I served a copy of each of the documents listed below by placing them for processing as indicated herein. NOTICE OF ENTRY OF ORDER United States Mail: The correspondence or documents were placed in sealed, labeled envelopes with postage thereon fully prepaid on the above date placed for collection and mailing at my place of business to be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service at Redwood City, California on this same date in the ordinary course of business. Overnight Delivery: The correspondence or documents were placed in sealed, labeled packaging for overnight de1ivery, with Federal Express, with all charges to be paid by my employer on the above date for collection at my place of business to be deposited in a facility regularly maintained by the overnight delivery carrier, or delivered to a courier or driver authorized by the overnight delivery carrier to receive such packages, on this date in the ordinary course of business. Hand Delivery: The correspondence or documents were placed in sealed, labeled envelopes and served by personal delivery to the party or attorney indicated herein, or if upon attorney, by leaving the labeled envelopes with a receptionist or other person having charge of the attorney's office. Facsimile Transmission: The correspondence or documents were placed for transmission from (650) 592-5027 at Redwood City, California, and were transmitted to a facsimile machine maintained by the party or attorney to be served at the facsimile machine telephone number provided by said party or attorney, on this same date in the ordinary course of business. The transmission was reported as complete and without error, and a record of the transmission was properly issued by the transmitting facsimile machine. 27 XX Electronic Transmission: The correspondence or documents were transmitted electronically to the electronic address set forth below. 28 l 2 3 4 5 6 7 State. The .recipient has filed and served notice that he or she accepts electronic service; the recipient has electronically filed a document with the court; and/ or the Court has mandated that the parties serve documents through its Court approved vendor. The printed form of this document bearing the original signature is on file and available for inspection at the request of the court or any party to the action or proceeding in which it is filed, in the manner provided in California Rule of Court Rufe 2.257(a). Federal. The recipient of this electronic service has consented to this method of service in writing, a copy of which is on file and available for inspection in my employer's office. I have received no indication the electronic transmission did not reach the recipient. 8 PERSONS OR PARTIES SERVED: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Attomevs for Plaintiffs Rohollah Sam Fareed, Esq. United Citizen Law 3400 Watt Avenue Suite 200A Sacramento, CA 95821 Telephone: Facsimile: E-mail: (916) 573-0474 (916) 543-1683 sfareed@uclaw.net juliana@uclaw.net Attome_vs for Plaintiffs Robert T. Simon, Esq. Brandon J. Simon, Esq. Gabriel Araj, Esq. THE SIMON LAW GROUP, LLP 8605 Santa Monica Blvd; PMB 90793 West Hollywood, California 90069-4109 Physical Address: 34 Hermosa Avenue Hermosa Beach, CA 90254 Telephone: (855) 855-8910 Facsimile: (855) 855-8910 E-mail: brandon@justiceteam.com gabriel@justiceteam.com michel1e@.1usticeteam.com I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on June 3, 2021. ~ Eva Oliveira Court: Superior Court of California, San Francisco County Action No: CGC-20-585130 Case Name: Alsaedi v. Westbrook