defendants objection to trial dateCal. Super. - 1st Dist.December 3, 20201 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Defendants’ Objection to Trial Date 718545 Case No: CGC-20-584447 Kathryn C. Klaus, Esq. - SBN 205923 CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH A Professional Corporation, Lawyers 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 300 Redwood City, CA 94065-2133 Telephone: 650.592.5400 Facsimile: 650.592.5027 ATTORNEYS FOR Defendants Ok Soon Key, individually, and as trustee of the Ok Soon Key Revocable Trust, Patricia Key IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO TEJASHWINI RAJENDRAN and JESSICA LYNN SMITH, Plaintiffs, vs. OK SOON KEY, individually, and as trustee of the Ok Soon Key Revocable Trust, PATRICIA KEY, and DOES 1 through 10, Defendants, Case No. CGC-20-584447 DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTION TO TRIAL DATE TO: PLAINTIFF AND TO HIS ATTORNEY OF RECORD PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that defendants Ok Soon Key, individually, and as trustee of the Ok Soon Key Revocable Trust, Patricia Key (hereinafter “Defendants”) hereby object to the notice of time and place of trial. All parties are to appear at 10:30 a.m. on December 2, 2020, in Department 610 for the objection hearing. Dated: November 24, 2020 CODDINGTON, HICKS & DANFORTH By: /s/Kathryn C. Klaus Kathryn C. Klaus Attorneys for Defendant Ok Soon Key, individually, and as trustee of the Ok Soon Key Revocable Trust, Patricia Key ELECTRONICALLY F I L E D Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco 11/24/2020 Clerk of the Court BY: JEFFREY LEE Deputy Clerk Kathryn C. Klaus Coddington, Hicks & Danforth (650) 592-5400 (650) 592-5027 This document shall serve as notice of a CourtCall Appearance by the participant listed below in the referenced case. Others wishing to appear remotely should contact CourtCall, LLC at (888) 882-6878 or (310) 342-0888. Case Name: Rajendran v. Key Case Number: CGC-20-584447 Court Name: San Francisco Superior Court (CA) Dept/Judge: 610 / Judge Garrett L. Wong Proceeding: Objection Hearing Date/Time: Wednesday, December 2nd, 2020 at 10:30 AM PT Tel: Fax: CourtCall Appearance - Service Copy Note: this is not a Confirmation of your CourtCall Appearance. Each participant must make his or her own arrangements with CourtCall. Our representatives are available to make presentations for your firm, your clients, Bar Associations or other groups. Please call to schedule a presentation. Remote Appearances. Simplified. While clients can save money and Courts can become more efficient and generate revenue, CourtCall has the most impact upon practicing attorneys as it helps to give them their lives back. Attorneys can use the time they save using CourtCall to catch-up on other pressing matters, enjoy time with family and friends or otherwise take advantage of the time no longer spent traveling to and from Court. Call us for details. There are no subscriptions or equipment to buy. COURTCALL VIDEO IS HERE! CourtCall is equipping Courtrooms of i n t e r e s t e d J u d g e s w i t h i t s s ta te-o f - the-ar t , browser-based v i deo con fe renc i ng p l a t f o rm, enabling full video participation for traditional CourtCall Appearances. Lawyers only need a computer with sufficient bandwidth and a webcam to view and/or share video in a c co rdance w i t h a J udge ' s preferences. To learn more about video options, please ask a CourtCall representative. The foregoing information may have been obtained from court records which may not reflect recent calendar changes. If it is i n a c c u r a t e b e c a u s e y o u r appearance has been continued, please apply this information to the new date. If the matter is off c a l e n d a r , y o u h a v e n o involvement in the case or you do not wish to use this service, please disregard this notice. Do not call the Court Clerk. CourtCall Appearances are available for over 2,000 Judges nationwide, with additional Courts being added monthly. Please visit our website at www.courtcall.com for a complete list of participating Courts and Judges across the US, Canada and other jurisdictions. NOTFD [P] SERVICE COPY FOR COURTCALL® APPEARANCE Copyright © 2020 CourtCall, LLC. All Rights Reserved. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROOF OF SERVICE California Code of Civil Procedure sections 1011, 1013, 1013a, 2015.5 California Rule of Court rule 2.251 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 5(b) I, the undersigned, declare that I am employed in the County of San Mateo, State of California. I am over the age of eighteen (18) years and not a party to the within action. My business address is 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 300, Redwood City, California 94065. My electronic mail address is joseguera@chdlawyers.com. I am readily familiar with my employer’s business practice for collection and processing of correspondence and documents for mailing with the United States Postal Service, mailing via overnight delivery, transmission by facsimile machine, and delivery by hand. On November 24, 2020, I served a copy of each of the documents listed below by placing said copies for processing as indicated herein. DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTION TO TRIAL DATE AND COURT CALL APPEARANCE - SERVICE COPY United States Mail: The correspondence or documents were placed in sealed, labeled envelopes with postage thereon fully prepaid on the above date placed for collection and mailing at my place of business to be deposited with the U.S. Postal Service at Redwood City, California on this same date in the ordinary course of business. Overnight Delivery: The correspondence or documents were placed in sealed, labeled packaging for overnight delivery, with Federal Express, with all charges to be paid by my employer on the above date for collection at my place of business to be deposited in a facility regularly maintained by the overnight delivery carrier, or delivered to a courier or driver authorized by the overnight delivery carrier to receive such packages, on this date in the ordinary course of business. Hand Delivery: The correspondence or documents were placed in sealed, labeled envelopes and served by personal delivery to the party or attorney indicated herein, or if upon attorney, by leaving the labeled envelopes with a receptionist or other person having charge of the attorney’s office. Facsimile Transmission: The correspondence or documents were placed for transmission from (650) 592-5027 at Redwood City, California, and were transmitted to a facsimile machine maintained by the party or attorney to be served at the facsimile machine telephone number provided by said party or attorney, on this same date in the ordinary course of business. The transmission was reported as complete and without error, and a record of the transmission was properly issued by the transmitting facsimile machine. XX Electronic Transmission: The correspondence or documents were transmitted electronically to the electronic address set forth below. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 State. The recipient has filed and served notice that he or she accepts electronic service; the recipient has electronically filed a document with the court; and/ or the Court has mandated that the parties serve documents through its Court approved vendor. The printed form of this document bearing the original signature is on file and available for inspection at the request of the court or any party to the action or proceeding in which it is filed, in the manner provided in California Rule of Court Rufe 2.257(a). Federal. The recipient of this electronic service has consented to this method of service in writing, a copy of which is on file and available for inspection in my employer's office. I have received no indication the electronic transmission did not reach the recipient. 8 PERSONS OR PARTIES SERVED: 9 Joseph S. Tobener 21 Masonic Avenue, Suite A 10 San Francisco, CA 94118 Telephone: Facsimile: E-mail: ( 415) 504-2165 (415) 418-3492 jtob · · tobcnerlaw.com obcncrlaw.com tobcncrlaw.com 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was exe 20 Court: Superior Court of California, Alameda County Action o: CGC-20-584447 21 Case ame: Rajendran v. Key 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 don November 24, 2020.
