46 Cited authorities

Ostrov v. Rozbruch
91 A.D.3d 147 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012) Cited 297 times 1 Legal Analyses
In Ostrov, the First Department held that, in the context of summary judgment, "[s]upplemental affirmations... should be sparingly used to clarify limited issues, and should not be utilized as a matter of course to correct deficiencies in a party's moving or answering papers" (emphasis added).
N.Y. State Corr. Officers & Police Benevolent Ass'n v. New York
94 N.Y.2d 321 (N.Y. 1999) Cited 327 times
Affirming arbitration award reinstating employee to his position as correctional officer, with full pay, notwithstanding the employee's having flown a Nazi flag on the porch of his home
Foley v. D'Agostino
21 A.D.2d 60 (N.Y. App. Div. 1964) Cited 739 times
Stating that “[t]hey may not assume and engage in the promotion of personal interests which are incompatible with the superior interests of their corporation.”
Union Sch. Dist v. Human Appeal Bd.
35 N.Y.2d 371 (N.Y. 1974) Cited 153 times
Holding that actions or proceedings which seek only enforcement of private rights and duties are subject to the notice-of-claim provisions against school district while such provisions are not applicable to actions seeking to vindicate a public interest
Albright v. Metz
88 N.Y.2d 656 (N.Y. 1996) Cited 60 times
In Albright, as previously noted, an infant plaintiff operated a dirt bike on a path that had been used for such purposes for many years, and the property was found by the Court of Appeals to be suitable for ATVs based upon its general characteristics.
McConnell v. Commonwealth Pic. Corp.
7 N.Y.2d 465 (N.Y. 1960) Cited 174 times
Holding contract for services unenforceable where plaintiff agreed to negotiate motion picture distribution rights for defendant and procured those rights through bribery
Szerdahelyi v. Harris
67 N.Y.2d 42 (N.Y. 1986) Cited 78 times
In Szerdahelyi, the Appellate Division had reversed the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff-borrower and remanded the case for trial.
Board of Educ. of Yonkers
40 N.Y.2d 268 (N.Y. 1976) Cited 102 times 1 Legal Analyses
Declaring public policy does not prevent public employer from agreeing to set size of work force during term of agreement
Weissman v. Evans
56 N.Y.2d 458 (N.Y. 1982) Cited 65 times
In Weissman v Evans (56 N.Y.2d 458, supra), we held that there was no rational basis for a wage disparity between District Court Judges in contiguous Nassau and Suffolk Counties.
Condon v. Associated Hospital Service
287 N.Y. 411 (N.Y. 1942) Cited 194 times
Holding that the supreme court is presumed to have jurisdiction of a cause of action unless the contrary plainly appears
Section 28 - Cession during use for purposes thereof, with reservation of right to serve process
N.Y. State Law § 28 Cited 14 times
Title and jurisdiction to the following tracts or parcels of land have been ceded to the United States by this state, on condition that the jurisdiction so ceded should not prevent the execution thereon of any process, civil or criminal, issued under the authority of the state, except as such process might affect the property of the United States therein, and that such jurisdiction shall continue in the United States so long only as the land shall be used and occupied for the purposes of cession

In the Matter of Subway Surface Supervisors Association, Respondent,v.New York City Transit Authority, Appellant.

46 Cited authorities

In Ostrov, the First Department held that, in the context of summary judgment, "[s]upplemental affirmations... should be sparingly used to clarify limited issues, and should not be utilized as a matter of course to correct deficiencies in a party's moving or answering papers" (emphasis added).

Affirming arbitration award reinstating employee to his position as correctional officer, with full pay, notwithstanding the employee's having flown a Nazi flag on the porch of his home

Stating that “[t]hey may not assume and engage in the promotion of personal interests which are incompatible with the superior interests of their corporation.”

Holding that actions or proceedings which seek only enforcement of private rights and duties are subject to the notice-of-claim provisions against school district while such provisions are not applicable to actions seeking to vindicate a public interest

In Albright, as previously noted, an infant plaintiff operated a dirt bike on a path that had been used for such purposes for many years, and the property was found by the Court of Appeals to be suitable for ATVs based upon its general characteristics.

Holding contract for services unenforceable where plaintiff agreed to negotiate motion picture distribution rights for defendant and procured those rights through bribery

In Szerdahelyi, the Appellate Division had reversed the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff-borrower and remanded the case for trial.

Declaring public policy does not prevent public employer from agreeing to set size of work force during term of agreement

In Weissman v Evans (56 N.Y.2d 458, supra), we held that there was no rational basis for a wage disparity between District Court Judges in contiguous Nassau and Suffolk Counties.

Holding that the supreme court is presumed to have jurisdiction of a cause of action unless the contrary plainly appears