72 Cited authorities

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett

    477 U.S. 317 (1986)   Cited 216,014 times   40 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a movant's summary judgment motion should be granted "against a [nonmovant] who fails to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party's case, and on which that party will bear the burden of proof at trial"
  2. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio

    475 U.S. 574 (1986)   Cited 112,965 times   38 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, on summary judgment, antitrust plaintiffs "must show that the inference of conspiracy is reasonable in light of the competing inferences of independent action or collusive action that could not have harmed" them
  3. Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Envtl. Servs. (TOC), Inc.

    528 U.S. 167 (2000)   Cited 7,127 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiffs who curtailed their recreational activities on a river due to reasonable concerns about the effect of pollutant discharges into that river had standing
  4. Scheuer v. Rhodes

    416 U.S. 232 (1974)   Cited 22,266 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that executive branch officers had qualified immunity
  5. Conley v. Gibson

    355 U.S. 41 (1957)   Cited 58,453 times   25 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief"
  6. Boag v. MacDougall

    454 U.S. 364 (1982)   Cited 5,309 times
    Holding the transfer to another prison did not moot a prisoner's claim for damages arising from placement in solitary confinement
  7. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of Dallas

    493 U.S. 215 (1990)   Cited 2,366 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the burden is on the plaintiff to allege facts sufficient to establish jurisdiction (quoting McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 298 U.S. 178, 189 (1936))
  8. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan

    376 U.S. 254 (1964)   Cited 6,906 times   36 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a public official or public figure can recover damages for defamation on a matter of public concern only if he proves that the speaker acted with actual malice
  9. Honig v. Doe

    484 U.S. 305 (1988)   Cited 2,074 times
    Holding that respondent's case in the IDEA context was not moot because he still resided in the state of California, which insisted that all local school districts retain residual authority to exclude disabled children for dangerous conduct
  10. County of Los Angeles v. Davis

    440 U.S. 625 (1979)   Cited 1,771 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that voluntary cessation can render an issue moot if “there is no reasonable expectation ... that the alleged violation will recur”
  11. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 344,855 times   920 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss
  12. Rule 56 - Summary Judgment

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 56   Cited 328,220 times   158 Legal Analyses
    Holding a party may move for summary judgment on any part of any claim or defense in the lawsuit
  13. Section 706 - Scope of review

    5 U.S.C. § 706   Cited 20,406 times   183 Legal Analyses
    Granting courts jurisdiction to "compel agency action unlawfully held or unreasonably delayed"
  14. Section 552 - Public information; agency rules, opinions, orders, records, and proceedings

    5 U.S.C. § 552   Cited 12,156 times   556 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Court's entering of a “Stipulation and Order” approving the parties' terms of dismissal did not amount to a “court-ordered consent decree” that would render the plaintiff the prevailing party
  15. Section 1746 - Unsworn declarations under penalty of perjury

    28 U.S.C. § 1746   Cited 9,998 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Permitting the use of declarations instead
  16. Section 553 - Rule making

    5 U.S.C. § 553   Cited 4,089 times   145 Legal Analyses
    Exempting "interpretative rules," among other things, from the notice-and-comment requirement
  17. Section 403q - Transferred

    50 U.S.C. § 403q   Cited 3 times
    Establishing the Office of Inspector General in the Central Intelligence Agency "to initiate and conduct independently inspections, investigations, and audits relating to programs and operations of the Agency"
  18. Section 1907.02 - Definitions

    32 C.F.R. § 1907.02   Cited 1 times

    For purposes of this part, the following terms have the meanings as indicated: (a)Agency or CIA means the United States Central Intelligence Agency acting through the CIA Information and Privacy Coordinator; (b)Authorized holder means anyone who has satisfied the conditions for access to classified information stated in section 4.1(a) of Executive Order 13526 and who has been granted access to such information; the term does not include anyone authorized such access by section 4.4 of Executive Order

  19. Section 2001.14 - Classification challenges

    32 C.F.R. § 2001.14   Cited 1 times
    Defining "authorized holders" to include "individual external to the agency, who ha[ve] been granted access to specific classified information in accordance with the provisions of the" applicable executive order
  20. Section 1907.01 - Authority and purpose

    32 C.F.R. § 1907.01   Cited 1 times

    (a)Authority: This Part is issued under the authority of and in order to implement section 1.8 of E.O. 13526, section 102 of the National Security Act of 1947, and section 6 of the CIA Act of 1949. (b)Purpose: This part prescribes procedures for non-Agency personnel who are authorized holders of CIA information, to challenge the classification status, whether classified or unclassified, based on a good faith belief that the current status of CIA information is improper. This part and section 1.8