21 Cited authorities

Kyles v. Whitley
514 U.S. 419 (1995) Cited 7,253 times 36 Legal Analyses
Holding the State's disclosure obligation turns on the cumulative effect of all suppressed evidence favorable to the defense
Old Chief v. United States
519 U.S. 172 (1997) Cited 3,026 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that the district court had abused its discretion in admitting the record of conviction when the defendant in that case offered to stipulate to a prior felony conviction
In re Winship
397 U.S. 358 (1970) Cited 11,640 times 24 Legal Analyses
Holding that the government must prove every element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt
Spectrum Sys. Int'l Corp. v. Chem. Bank
78 N.Y.2d 371 (N.Y. 1991) Cited 590 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that the document at issue was exempt from discovery where "the narration relate[d] and integrate[d] the facts with the law firm's assessment of the client's legal position"
People v. Taranovich
37 N.Y.2d 442 (N.Y. 1975) Cited 988 times
In People v. Taranovich, 37 N.Y.2d 442 (1975), the New York Court of Appeals adopted a substantially similar balancing test, using the following factors: "(1) the extent of the delay; (2) the reason for the delay; (3) the nature of the underlying charge; (4) whether or not there has been an extended period of pretrial incarceration; and (5) whether or not there is any indication that the defense has been impaired by reason of the delay."
People v. Rosario
9 N.Y.2d 286 (N.Y. 1961) Cited 1,651 times
Holding that trial court erred by failing to compel prosecution to turn over witnesses' prior statements relating to their trial testimony
Cynthia B. v. Hospital
60 N.Y.2d 452 (N.Y. 1983) Cited 200 times
Holding when party moves to compel disclosure of medical records, treating hospital, physician, or other custodian of medical records may request protective order on ground that disclosure might be seriously detrimental to patient's interests regardless of fact that patient, by commencing litigation, waived physician-patient privilege
O'Neill v. Oakgrove Constr
71 N.Y.2d 521 (N.Y. 1988) Cited 165 times 1 Legal Analyses
Recognizing a qualified privilege arising under the federal and the state constitutions for non-confidential materials
Matter of World Trade Center Bombing Litigation
93 N.Y.2d 1 (N.Y. 1999) Cited 74 times
Decided February 16, 1999 BELLACOSA, J.: The civil lawsuits, assembled within this consolidated discovery dispute, stem from negligence claims of individuals and businesses that allege various injuries and damages as a result of the World Trade Center bombing in 1993. At issue are plaintiffs' pretrial efforts to obtain WTC building security plans and documents from the Port Authority. Defendant PA opposes this document turnover on grounds of public safety. It asserts New York's public interest privilege
Matter of Beach v. Shanley
62 N.Y.2d 241 (N.Y. 1984) Cited 91 times 2 Legal Analyses
In Beach we held that a Grand Jury subpoena should have been quashed where the only testimony sought was the identity of a broadcast reporter's confidential source.

In the Matter of the People, Appellant,v.Conrado Juarez, Defendant. Frances Robles, Nonparty Respondent.

21 Cited authorities

Holding the State's disclosure obligation turns on the cumulative effect of all suppressed evidence favorable to the defense

Holding that the district court had abused its discretion in admitting the record of conviction when the defendant in that case offered to stipulate to a prior felony conviction

Holding that the government must prove every element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt

Holding that the document at issue was exempt from discovery where "the narration relate[d] and integrate[d] the facts with the law firm's assessment of the client's legal position"

Holding that trial court erred by failing to compel prosecution to turn over witnesses' prior statements relating to their trial testimony

Recognizing a qualified privilege arising under the federal and the state constitutions for non-confidential materials

In Beach we held that a Grand Jury subpoena should have been quashed where the only testimony sought was the identity of a broadcast reporter's confidential source.