§Why CasetextPricing

Excess Line Association of New York (ELANY), Appellant,v.Waldorf & Associates, et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Brief

12 Cited authorities

  1. Community Bd. 7 v. Schaffer

    84 N.Y.2d 148 (N.Y. 1994)   Cited 243 times
    Finding such a stake where the defendant's breach of a covenant affected plaintiff's property interest

  2. Graziano v. County of Albany

    3 N.Y.3d 475 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 109 times

    146. Argued October 13, 2004. Decided November 30, 2004. Appeal, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, entered October 30, 2003. The Appellate Division (1) reversed, on the law, a judgment, as amended, of the Supreme Court, Albany County (Louis C. Benza, J.; op 2003 NY Slip Op 51035[U]), entered in a combined proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and action for declaratory judgment, which had denied respondents'

  3. Uhr v. East Greenbush Central School District

    94 N.Y.2d 32 (N.Y. 1999)   Cited 111 times
    Holding that statute did not imply private right of action and affirming dismissal of common law negligence claim based on same conduct

  4. Riverhead v. Real Prop Servs

    5 N.Y.3d 36 (N.Y. 2005)   Cited 65 times
    In Matter of Town of Riverhead v New York State Bd. of Real Prop. Servs. (5 NY3d 36, 43), we concluded that, "[i]n light of the express limitation set forth in RPTL 1218," a municipality lacks the capacity to contest a segment-special equalization rate established by the State Board for a different municipality within the same school district.

  5. City of New York v. City Civil Service Commission

    60 N.Y.2d 436 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 110 times
    Holding that the DCAS Commissioner's predecessor "has both policy-making authority and functional responsibility for civil service matters in New York City"

  6. John Paterno, Inc. v. Curiale

    88 N.Y.2d 328 (N.Y. 1996)   Cited 31 times

    Argued April 30, 1996 Decided June 6, 1996 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department. Dennis C. Vacco, Attorney-General, New York City (Vincent Leong, Victoria A. Graffeo, Barbara Gott Billett, Thomas D. Hughes and Michael S. Belohlavek of counsel), for appellant-respondent. Abrams Martin, P.C., New York City (Kevin J. Spencer and Alan Jay Martin of counsel), for respondents-appellants. CIPARICK, J. This appeal centers on a determination by the Superintendent

  7. Hanys Svcs. v. Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield

    292 A.D.2d 61 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)   Cited 16 times

    90080 January 31, 2002. Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Malone Jr., J.), entered February 1, 2001 in Albany County, which granted defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Iseman, Cunningham, Riester Hyde L.L.P. (Michael J. Cunningham of counsel), Albany, for HANYS Insurance Company Inc. and others, appellants. Le Boeuf, Lamb, Greene MacRae (Robert Alessi of counsel), Albany, for Medical Liability Mutual Insurance Company, appellant. Rivkin, Radler Kremer (Evan

  8. In re Board of Education v. Board of Tr. N.Y

    282 A.D.2d 166 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)   Cited 14 times

    Decided and Entered: April 19, 2001. Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Sise, J.), entered September 21, 2000 in Albany County, which, in a combined proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 and action for declaratory judgment, inter alia, dismissed petitioner Board of Education of the Roosevelt Union Free School District as a party. Jaspan, Schlesinger Hoffman (Stanley A. Camhi of counsel), Garden City, for appellants. Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Alicia R. Ouellette of counsel), Albany

  9. Flacke v. Freshwater Wetlands

    53 N.Y.2d 537 (N.Y. 1981)   Cited 12 times
    Analyzing agency's capacity to sue, although using the term "capacity" interchangeably with "standing"

  10. New Y. Prop. Ins. v. A.F. Holding

    196 A.D.2d 695 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

    September 2, 1993 Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam J. Altman, J.). The sole issue on this appeal in this combined interpleader/declaratory judgment action is whether, pursuant to Insurance Law § 331 (d) the City timely served upon plaintiff-respondent New York Property Insurance Underwriting Association ("NYPIUA") a certificate of lien against the proceeds of a fire insurance policy held by defendant-respondent A.F. Holding Corp. Section 331 Ins. of the Insurance Law, which

  11. Section 27.4 - Binding authority

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 11 § 27.4   1 Legal Analyses

    (a) Section 2118(f) of the Insurance Law provides that an excess line broker may execute an authority to bind coverage for risks located within or outside of the State of New York and may exercise binding authority on behalf of an insurer not licensed or authorized to do business in this State. (b) No excess line broker shall exercise binding authority on behalf of an unauthorized insurer, when the insured's home state is this State, unless: (1) the placement conforms in all respects with section