§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of County of Jefferson, Appellant,v.Nirav R. Shah,, et al., Respondents.

Brief

84 Cited authorities

  1. Colavito v. New York Organ Donor Network, Inc.

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 9320 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 645 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that survivors' limited right to control the burial of a deceased relative did not imply a general, common-law property right in body parts

  2. Sharp v. Kosmalski

    40 N.Y.2d 119 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 825 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding confidential relationship existed between transferor and transferee

  3. State v. Seventh Regiment Fund, Inc.

    98 N.Y.2d 249 (N.Y. 2002)   Cited 305 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding demand futile where circumstances show good-faith possessor knows he has no right to goods

  4. Simonds v. Simonds

    45 N.Y.2d 233 (N.Y. 1978)   Cited 561 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an interest obtained through an agreement supported by consideration “is superior to that of a named beneficiary who has given no consideration”

  5. Thyroff v. Nationwide

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 2442 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 190 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that computer files could be the subject of a conversion claim, where plaintiff was entirely denied use of those files

  6. Nastasi v. Nastasi

    26 A.D.3d 32 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)   Cited 160 times
    Discussing use of the term abatement in the C.P.L.R.

  7. Stiver v. Good

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9062 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 143 times
    Holding defendant cannot be said to have launched an instrument of harm because there is no evidence that condition was made less safe

  8. Parsa v. State of New York

    64 N.Y.2d 143 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 270 times
    Holding that "a contract implied in fact" is "a true contract based upon an implied promise" and therefore is subject to statutes governing governmental liability on contracts

  9. Lemle v. Lemle

    92 A.D.3d 494 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 108 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Stating that it was error to dismiss conversion and breach of fiduciary duty claims, where the complaint alleged "that plaintiff's siblings falsified loan documents so as to eliminate millions of dollars in principal and interest they owed to the corporation; used corporate funds to pay for personal vacation, shopping and other non-business-related expenses; and used corporate funds to pay excessive compensation and benefits to themselves and other individuals who did little or no work for the corporation"

  10. Meese v. Miller

    79 A.D.2d 237 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)   Cited 219 times
    Reversing dismissal of conversion claim where the plaintiffs adequately alleged that defendants "asserted an unauthorized control over plaintiff's property subsequent to and independent of the contract"

  11. Section 601.3 - Reimbursement claiming time limits

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 18 § 601.3   Cited 6 times

    Except as otherwise provided, to be eligible for State reimbursement, expenditures for public assistance, care and services, or for any other activity which is subject to reimbursement by the department, must be made within the time limits set forth in this section and must be included in a claim submitted by the social services district to the department for the time period in which such expenditures are claimed to have been made. (a) Claims for expenditures which are subject to reimbursement by