§Why CasetextPricing

In the Matter of Brookford, LLC, Appellant,v.New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal, et al., Respondents.

Brief

11 Cited authorities

  1. Pell v. Board of Education

    34 N.Y.2d 222 (N.Y. 1974)   Cited 5,553 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Discussing the standard of review in an Article 78 appeal

  2. Peckham v. Calogero

    2009 N.Y. Slip Op. 3585 (N.Y. 2009)   Cited 514 times
    In Peckham v Calogero (12 NY3d 424 [2009]) the Court of Appeals upheld the determination of the State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR), which granted a landlord's application to refuse renewal of its tenant's lease.

  3. Matter of Purdy v. Kreisberg

    47 N.Y.2d 354 (N.Y. 1979)   Cited 249 times

    Argued April 27, 1979 Decided June 12, 1979 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department. Joel H. Sachs, Town Attorney, for appellants. Paul M. Rosen for respondent. JASEN, J. In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, we are called upon to decide whether the determination of the respondent Board of Police Commissioners of the Town of Greenburgh dismissing petitioner Purdy from the police department is supported by substantial evidence. Petitioner, a veteran

  4. Ansonia Assocs. Ltd. P'ship v. Unwin

    130 A.D.3d 453 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)   Cited 30 times
    In Ansonia Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Unwin, 130 AD3d 453, 13 NYS3d 67 [1st Dept., 2015] the court held an apartment claimed to be the residence of a tenant could not be such residence since the tenant asserted on her income tax statements that such apartment was not her residence.

  5. Power v. N.Y

    61 A.D.3d 544 (N.Y. App. Div. 2009)   Cited 9 times

    No. 356. April 21, 2009. Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Tejada, J.), entered March 7, 2007, which denied the petition seeking a writ of prohibition preventing Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) from processing the owner's 2004 luxury deregulation proceeding and from demanding or verifying petitioner roommate Hastings' 2002 tax information in connection therewith, and granted DHCR's cross motion to dismiss, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Sokolski Zekaria, P.C.,

  6. A.J. Clarke Real Estate Corp. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

    307 A.D.2d 841 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003)   Cited 8 times

    1490 August 14, 2003. Order and judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William Wetzel, J.), entered on or about October 11, 2002, which denied petitioner landlord's application to annul respondent DHCR's determination denying the landlord's application to deregulate the subject apartment under the luxury decontrol law, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Jeffrey R. Metz, for petitioner-appellant. Martin B. Schneider, for respondent-respondent. Kent Karlsson, for i

  7. Matter of Ynkrs. Gardens v. St. Hous. Com. Renewal

    51 N.Y.2d 966 (N.Y. 1980)   Cited 19 times

    Argued October 15, 1980 Decided November 18, 1980 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, ALVIN R. RUSKIN, J. William A. Zutt for appellant. Martin A. Shlufman and Harold Zucker for respondents. Gary M. Rosenberg for Apartment House Council of Long Island Builders Institute, amicus curiae. MEMORANDUM. Determination appealed from and order of the Appellate Division brought up for review affirmed, with costs. Petitioner failed to raise before the Division

  8. 65 Central Park v. Greenwald

    127 Misc. 2d 547 (N.Y. Civ. Ct. 1985)   Cited 13 times

    March 4, 1985 Finkelstein, Borah, Schwartz, Altschuler Goldstein, P.C., for petitioner. Hartman, Ule Rose for respondent. DAVID B. SAXE, J. Esther Turtz Greenwald has resided for 50 of her 85 years at 65 Central Park West, in apartment 2B, a rent-controlled premises. During the summer of 1982, Mrs. Greenwald became ill, was hospitalized at Mt. Sinai Hospital, and then, in October of 1982 she entered DeWitt Nursing Home. The landlord, believing her chances of recovery and likelihood of her returning

  9. L.J.M. Venture No. 1 v. Joy

    105 Misc. 2d 291 (N.Y. Misc. 1980)   Cited 10 times
    In Matter of L.J.M. Venture No. 1 v. Joy (105 Misc.2d 291 [Sup Ct, N Y County 1980]), which was cited by petitioner in support of his contention, the court determined that an 81-year-old rent-controlled tenant residing in a nursing home had changed her primary residence.

  10. Section 2211.5 - Determination by Department of Taxation and Finance (DTF) (Repealed)

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 9 § 2211.5

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. Tit. 9 § 2211.5 Repealed New York State Register November 8, 2023/Volume XLV, Issue 45, eff. 11/8/2023

  11. Section 2211.1 - Definitions

    N.Y. Comp. Codes R. & Regs. tit. 9 § 2211.1

    (a) Annual income. For the purposes of this section, annual income shall mean the Federal adjusted gross income as reported on the New York State income tax return. (b) Total annual income. For the purposes of this section, total annual income means the sum of the annual incomes of all persons who occupy the housing accommodation as their primary residence other than on a temporary basis, excluding bona fide employees of such occupants residing therein in connection with such employment and excluding