§Why CasetextPricing

Carol Artibee et al., Appellants,v.Home Place Corporation, Respondent.

Brief

11 Cited authorities

  1. Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.

    531 U.S. 457 (2001)   Cited 1,090 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Chevron deference is due only to a " reasonable interpretation made by the administrator of an agency"

  2. Dole v. Dow Chemical Co.

    30 N.Y.2d 143 (N.Y. 1972)   Cited 727 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that liability should be apportioned among joint tortfeasors according to relative fault

  3. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n v. City of New York

    41 N.Y.2d 205 (N.Y. 1976)   Cited 408 times

    Argued October 12, 1976 Decided December 22, 1976 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, GEORGE STARKE, J. W. Bernard Richland, Corporation Counsel (James G. Greilsheimer and L. Kevin Sheridan of counsel), New York City, for appellant. Frederick R. Livingston, Jay W. Waks and William C. Zifchak, New York City, for respondent. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (George D. Zuckerman and Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), New York City, for intervenor

  4. Cruz v. TD Bank, N.A.

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 7762 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 114 times
    Stating that New York courts have "declined to recognize a private right of action in instances where ‘the Legislature specifically considered and expressly provided for enforcement mechanisms’ in the statute itself" (quoting Mark G. v. Sabol , 93 N.Y.2d 710, 720, 695 N.Y.S.2d 730, 717 N.E.2d 1067 (1999) )

  5. Rangolan v. County of Nassau

    96 N.Y.2d 42 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 99 times
    In Rangolan v. County of Nassau (96 NY2d 42), this Court held that CPLR 1602 (2) (iv) did not preclude apportionment when a defendant's liability arose from a nondelegable duty because the subsection was a savings provision and not an exception.

  6. Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School District

    (N.Y. May. 12, 1998)   Cited 75 times
    In Majewski the New York Court of Appeals observed that "the date that legislation is to take effect is a separate question from whether the statute should apply to claims and rights then in existence."

  7. Morales v. County of Nassau

    94 N.Y.2d 218 (N.Y. 1999)   Cited 55 times
    Rejecting expressio unius as a basis for “creat[ing] an entirely new exemption that is not suggested by the language of the statute or its history”

  8. Rezucha v. Garlock Packing

    159 Misc. 2d 855 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1993)   Cited 16 times
    Holding that, although State of New York was immune from suit in court, plaintiff could obtain "jurisdiction" over State within the meaning of CPLR 1601

  9. Engle v. Talarico

    33 N.Y.2d 237 (N.Y. 1973)   Cited 36 times

    Argued September 20, 1973 Decided December 27, 1973 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, FRANK J. KRONENBERG, J. George M. Donohue, Corporation Counsel ( Jacqueline M. Koshian of counsel), for appellant. Paul H. Reid, Jr. for respondent. Thomas F. McGrath and Henry E. Wyluda for New York State Board of Equalization and Assessment, amicus curiae. BREITEL, J. In a certiorari proceeding by petitioner taxpayer to obtain an old age residential real

  10. Walter v. White-Bonn, Inc.

    8 A.D.3d 715 (N.Y. App. Div. 2004)   Cited 3 times

    94592. Decided and Entered: June 3, 2004. Appeals (1) from an order of the Supreme Court (Relihan Jr., J.), entered January 27, 2003 in Broome County, which denied a motion by defendant White-Bonn, Inc. to dismiss the complaint against it, and (2) from an order of said court, entered November 6, 2003 in Broome County, which, inter alia, denied said defendant's motion for partial summary judgment. Law Offices of Laurie G. Ogden, Syracuse (P. David Twichell of counsel), for appellant. Hinman, Howard