53 Cited authorities

  1. Idaho v. Coeur D'Alene Tribe of Idaho

    521 U.S. 261 (1997)   Cited 1,647 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, because "navigable waters uniquely implicate sovereign interests," there exists a "strong presumption of state ownership" of these waters
  2. Rocovich v. Consol Edison Co.

    78 N.Y.2d 509 (N.Y. 1991)   Cited 1,699 times
    Holding that "[i]t is an accepted rule that all parts of a statute are intended to be given effect and that a statutory construction which renders one part meaningless should be avoided"
  3. Leader v. Maroney

    97 N.Y.2d 95 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 772 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts have discretion to decide whether to extend time to serve for good cause shown or in the interest of justice
  4. Parochial v. Board of Educ

    60 N.Y.2d 539 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 824 times
    Holding that § 3813's notice of claim requirement "is not satisfied by presentment to any other individual or body"
  5. Walton v. Correctional Servs

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 1384 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 203 times
    Holding claimants must initiate Article 78 proceedings "within four months after the determination to be reviewed becomes final and binding upon the petitioner"
  6. New York City Bd. of Estimate v. Morris

    489 U.S. 688 (1989)   Cited 112 times
    Holding New York City borough presidents' automatic board vote unconstitutional
  7. N.Y. Cnty. Lawyers' Ass'n v. Bloomberg

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 7224 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 83 times
    In County Lawyers' v. Bloomberg, 19 N.Y.3d 712, 721, 955 N.Y.S.2d 835, 979 N.E.2d 1162 [2012], the Court of Appeals provides additional guidance.
  8. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. Town of Red Hook

    60 N.Y.2d 99 (N.Y. 1983)   Cited 177 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding state had preempted local regulation regarding the siting of major steam electric-generating plants
  9. Friends of Van Cortland Park, v. City of New York

    95 N.Y.2d 623 (N.Y. 2001)   Cited 77 times
    Alienating parkland "requires the direct and specific approval of the State Legislature, plainly conferred"
  10. People v. Garson

    2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2409 (N.Y. 2006)   Cited 60 times
    In People v Garson (6 NY3d 604), the Court of Appeals held that a judge's acceptance of a benefit for the violation of his duty as a public servant, as defined by the Rules of Judicial Conduct, could support a conviction of receiving reward for official misconduct in the second degree in violation of Penal Law § 200.25.