Motion for Summary Judgment and or Adjudication

Cal. Super. - 2nd Dist.October 10, 2017

123 Judge SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, TENTATIVE RULINGS EVENT DATE: EVENT TIME: VENTURA DIVISION January 25, 2019 01/30/2019 08:20:00 AM DEPT.: 21 COUNTY OF VENTURA JUDICIAL OFFICER: Kent Kellegrew CASE NUM: CASE CATEGORY: EVENT TYPE: CASE TITLE: CASE TYPE:Civil - Unlimited PI/PD/WD - Other 56-2017-00502557-CU-PO-VTA SINGH V SINGH Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication CAUSAL DOCUMENT/DATE FILED: Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication, 11/02/2018 stolo The Court intends to Grant the motion for summary judgment. Under the circumstances established, defendant Margus Limited owed no duty to the decedent. All of plaintiffs' evidentiary objections are overruled. All of defendant Margus's evidentiary objections except numbers 5, 6 and 8 are sustained. For purposes of this motion only the court finds: UMFs 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 13, 14, 15, 21, 22 and 23 are undisputed. UMFs 2, 5, 9, 11, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20 are disputed, but nonetheless established. UMF 12 is disputed and not established by the evidence cited to by defendant. UMF 7 is disputed. All but that portion of it which suggests Parminder had rented forklifts from U-Rent approximately 22 times is established. As to that portion, it is not established by the evidence cited to by defendant. TENTATIVE RULINGS Page: 1