Motion to CompelCal. Super. - 2nd Dist.June 22, 2015123 Judge SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, TENTATIVE RULINGS EVENT DATE: EVENT TIME: VENTURA DIVISION April 20, 2016 04/22/2016 08:20:00 AM DEPT.: 21 COUNTY OF VENTURA JUDICIAL OFFICER: Kent Kellegrew CASE NUM: CASE CATEGORY: EVENT TYPE: CASE TITLE: CASE TYPE:Civil - Unlimited PI/PD/WD - Other 56-2015-00468999-CU-PO-VTA CASTELLANOS VS PAC II VENTURES Motion to Compel - Deft's to Provide further responses to form interrog's, set one; Request for sanctions CAUSAL DOCUMENT/DATE FILED: Motion to Compel, 03/03/2016 stolo The Court intends to Deny as to Requests 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10. The Requests go well beyond what could possibly be relevant to this case. For example, information about electrical wiring inspections, e.g. would be covered by Demand 5 and yet completely irrelevant. Information about maintenance of a copy machine would be covered by Demand 6 and yet completely irrelevant. Compel as to Request 8, 12 and 13, but only as to the last five years. Compel as to Request 14, but Defendant can withhold documents covered by attorney-client or attorney work production protection so long as Defendant prepares a privilege log. No sanctions. TENTATIVE RULINGS Page: 1
