28 Cited authorities

  1. Jackson v. Virginia

    443 U.S. 307 (1979)   Cited 68,985 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court must presume trier of fact resolved all inferences in favor of the prosecution "even if it does not affirmatively appear in the record"
  2. State v. Danielson

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9814 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 7,391 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding a "legally sufficient verdict can be against the weight of the evidence"
  3. People v. Sandoval

    34 N.Y.2d 371 (N.Y. 1974)   Cited 2,159 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the trial court must balance the "probative worth of evidence of prior specific criminal, vicious or immoral acts on the issue of the defendant's credibility on the one hand, and on the other the risk of unfair prejudice to the defendant"
  4. State v. Henderson

    208 N.J. 208 (N.J. 2011)   Cited 549 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding a jury instruction on cross-racial identification should be given whenever cross-racial identification is in issue at trial
  5. People v. Rosario

    9 N.Y.2d 286 (N.Y. 1961)   Cited 1,545 times
    Holding that trial court erred by failing to compel prosecution to turn over witnesses' prior statements relating to their trial testimony
  6. People v. Rayam

    94 N.Y.2d 557 (N.Y. 2000)   Cited 297 times

    Argued February 15, 2000 Decided April 11, 2000. Jeffrey I. Richman, and M. Sue Wycoff for appellant. Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney of New York County, New York City (Hilary Hassler and Mark Dwyer of counsel), for respondent. LEVINE, J. Based on events that allegedly occurred at the complaining witness's apartment over a 13-hour period from the evening of February 27 to the morning of February 28, 1995, defendant was indicted on single counts of burglary in the first degree and kidnaping

  7. People v. Martinez

    71 N.Y.2d 937 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 370 times
    Authorizing appropriate sanctions for the failure to preserve witness statements
  8. People v. Concepcion

    2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 5110 (N.Y. 2011)   Cited 171 times

    17 N.Y.3d 192 953 N.E.2d 779, 929 N.Y.S.2d 541 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Reynaldo CONCEPCION, Appellant. No. 2011-05110 Court of Appeals of New York. June 14, 2011 Appellate Advocates, New York City (John Gemmill and Lynn W.L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant. Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn (Thomas S. Burka and Leonard Joblove of counsel), for respondent. OPINION READ, J. The outcome of this appeal is dictated by our decision in People v. LaFontaine, 92 N

  9. People v. Kelly

    467 N.E.2d 498 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 299 times
    Applying New York rule, which parallels federal rule; concluding that dismissal was an abuse of discretion where adverse inference instruction would have adequately remedied prejudice caused by government's destruction of evidence
  10. People v. Brown

    80 N.Y.2d 729 (N.Y. 1993)   Cited 181 times
    Holding that "spontaneous descriptions of events made substantially contemporaneously with the observations are admissible if the descriptions are sufficiently corroborated by other evidence"