§Why CasetextPricing

Karine Gevorkyan, et al., Appellants,v.Ira Judelson, Respondent.

Brief

21 Cited authorities

  1. Albany Law Sch. v. New York State Office of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities

    2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 3227 (N.Y. 2012)   Cited 103 times

    No. 65 04-26-2012 In the Matter of Albany Law School et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities et al., Appellants-Respondents. Victor Paladino, for appellants-respondents. Jennifer J. Monthie, for respondents-appellants. NYSARC, Inc.; National Disability Rights Network et al., amici curiae. GRAFFEO Victor Paladino, for appellants-respondents. Jennifer J. Monthie, for respondents-appellants. NYSARC, Inc.; National Disability Rights

  2. Friedman v. Connecticut

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 7771 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 75 times

    No. 116. Argued September 5, 2007. decided October 18, 2007. APPEAL, by permission of the Court of Appeals, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, entered June 29, 2006. The Appellate Division order, insofar as appealed from, modified, on the law, an order of the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard B. Lowe, III, J.; op 2004 NY Slip Op 30089[U]), which had granted defendant's motion for summary judgment to the extent of dismissing the first

  3. Nostrom v. A.W. Chesterton Co.

    2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 8385 (N.Y. 2010)   Cited 66 times
    Holding that "owners and contractors may be vicariously liable based on violations of part 23 regulations."

  4. Ostrer v. Schenck

    41 N.Y.2d 782 (N.Y. 1977)   Cited 143 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Argued March 21, 1977 Decided June 7, 1977 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, VINCENT MASSI, J. Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Robert S. Hammer and Samuel A. Hirshowitz of counsel), New York City, for appellant. Philip R. November, New York City, for respondent. JASEN, J. In June, 1973, the Superintendent of Insurance promulgated regulation 65 (11 N.Y.CRR Part 202), which limits to specified maximum levels, adjusted for volume, the commissions

  5. In re Texas Ass'n of School Boards, Inc.

    169 S.W.3d 653 (Tex. 2005)   Cited 49 times
    Holding that section 15.020 was not applicable to suit arising from insurance contract between corporate entities only because insurance coverage limits could not be included in the “aggregate stated value” of consideration

  6. Moran Towing v. Tax Commn

    72 N.Y.2d 166 (N.Y. 1988)   Cited 80 times

    Argued May 25, 1988 Decided July 12, 1988 Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department, Daniel H. Prior, Jr., J. Gwynne H. Wales, Emanuel G. Demos and Robert S. Herbst for appellants. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Peter G. Crary, O. Peter Sherwood and Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondent. William J. O'Brien and Ernesto V. Luzzatto for The Maritime Association of the Port of New York/New Jersey, amicus curiae. SIMONS, J. The issue presented is

  7. People v. Duggins

    3 N.Y.3d 522 (N.Y. 2004)   Cited 40 times
    Attaching significance to the Legislature's use of the present tense in construing a section of the Penal Law

  8. Rodless Prop. v. Fire Ins. Co.

    40 A.D.3d 253 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)   Cited 20 times
    Applying New York law; same reasoning and result

  9. Gevorkyan v. Judelson

    841 F.3d 584 (2d Cir. 2016)   Cited 6 times

    No. 15-3249-cv September Term, 2016 11-15-2016 Karine Gevorkyan, Arthur Bogoraz, Inna Moldaver, and Sam Moldaver, Plaintiffs–Appellants, v. Ira Judelson, Defendant–Appellee. Andrew Lavoott Bluestone, New York, NY, for Plaintiffs–Appellants Karine Gevorkyan, Arthur Bogoraz, Inna Moldaver, Sam Moldaver. Jonathan Svetkey, Waters & Svetkey, New York, NY, for Defendant–Appellee Ira Judelson. Barrington D. Parker, Circuit Judge Andrew Lavoott Bluestone , New York, NY, for Plaintiffs–Appellants Karine Gevorkyan

  10. People ex rel. Aidala v. Warden, Rikers Island Corr. Fac.

    100 A.D.3d 667 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)   Cited 5 times

    2012-11-7 The PEOPLE, etc., ex rel. Arthur AIDALA, on behalf of Arthur Bogoraz, petitioner, v. WARDEN, RIKERS ISLAND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, respondent. Arthur Aidala, Brooklyn, N.Y., petitioner pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Stephen J. Swenton, Nina M. Sas, and Arielle B. Singer of counsel), for respondent. Arthur Aidala, Brooklyn, N.Y., petitioner pro se.Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York, N.Y. (Stephen J. Swenton, Nina M. Sas, and Arielle B. Singer

  11. Section 985 - Order that defendant be committed to actual custody unless defendant gives bail in increased amount

    Cal. Pen. Code § 985   Cited 7 times

    When the information or indictment is for a felony, and the defendant, before the filing thereof, has given bail for his appearance to answer the charge, the Court to which the indictment or information is presented, or in which it is pending, may order the defendant to be committed to actual custody, unless he gives bail in an increased amount, to be specified in the order. Ca. Pen. Code § 985 Amended by Code Amendments 1880, Ch. 47.

  12. Section 15-4-5 - Refusal of witness to answer questions

    Ala. Code § 15-4-5

    In an inquest under this chapter, any witness who refuses to answer any question in relation to the cause of death, except on the ground that it may criminate himself, is guilty of a misdemeanor and must be committed to jail by the coroner, unless he gives bail in the sum of $500.00 to appear at the circuit court and answer such offense, and, on conviction thereof, shall be fined not less than $200.00 nor more than $500.00, and may be imprisoned not exceeding three months. Ala. Code § 15-4-5 (1975)

  13. Section 24.23 - Witness Released

    Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 24.23

    A witness who is in custody for failing to give bail shall be at once released upon giving bail required. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. § 24.23 Acts 1965, 59th Leg., p. 317, ch. 722, Sec. 1, eff. 1/1/1966.