§Why CasetextPricing

Dryden Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant,v.Stanley Goessl, et al., Defendants, AP Daino & Plumbing, Inc. et al., Respondents.

Brief

32 Cited authorities

  1. Thompson v. Grumman Corp.

    78 N.Y.2d 553 (N.Y. 1991)   Cited 521 times
    Holding employee to be “special employee” where general employer loaned employee to special employer who “exerted comprehensive control over every facet of his work” notwithstanding fact that general employer provided paychecks and Workers Compensation coverage

  2. Thoreson v. Penthouse Intl

    80 N.Y.2d 490 (N.Y. 1992)   Cited 422 times
    Relying on expressio unius, statutory language, and legislative history to foreclose expansion of listed damages remedies

  3. Matter of Field Delivery Serv

    66 N.Y.2d 516 (N.Y. 1985)   Cited 378 times
    Stating that agency decision "which neither adheres to its own prior precedent nor indicates its reason for reaching a different result on essentially the same facts is arbitrary and capricious"

  4. Fung v. Japan Airlines Co.

    2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 9815 (N.Y. 2007)   Cited 176 times
    Considering “actual working relationship between that party and the purported ‘employee’ ”

  5. Jered Contr. Corp. v. N.Y.C. Tr. Auth

    22 N.Y.2d 187 (N.Y. 1968)   Cited 248 times
    In Jered Contr. Corp. v. N.Y.C. In. Auth., 22 N.Y.2d 187, 292 N.Y.S.2d 98, 239 N.E.2d 197 (1968), the plaintiff, a painting contractor, entered into a written contract with the Transit Authority. The plaintiff and a company officer, Jerome, were indicted for perjury in connection with submitting "false noncollusive bidding statements" to another agency.

  6. In re Ted Is Back Corp.

    64 N.Y.2d 725 (N.Y. 1984)   Cited 125 times
    Noting that "control over the means is the more important factor to be considered"

  7. In re City of Syracuse Industrial Development Agency

    20 A.D.3d 168 (N.Y. App. Div. 2005)   Cited 49 times

    CA 04-01506. June 10, 2005. CROSS APPEALS from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Charles T. Major, J.), entered February 13, 2004 in a proceeding pursuant to EDPL article 5. The judgment awarded respondents $433,220, together with interest and costs. Hiscock Barclay, LLP, Buffalo ( Mark R. McNamara of counsel), for appellant-respondent. Law Offices of Robert A. Gladstone, Belle Mead, New Jersey ( Robert A. Gladstone of the New Jersey Bar, admitted pro hac vice, of counsel), for r

  8. 409-411 Sixth Street, LLC v. Mogi

    2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 6604 (N.Y. 2013)   Cited 33 times

    10-10-2013 409–411 SIXTH STREET, LLC, Appellant, v. Masako MOGI, Respondent. Belkin Burden Wenig & Goldman, LLC, New York City (Magda L. Cruz of counsel), for appellant. De Castro Law Firm, Woodside (Steven M. De Castro of counsel), for respondent. Belkin Burden Wenig & Goldman, LLC, New York City (Magda L. Cruz of counsel), for appellant. De Castro Law Firm, Woodside (Steven M. De Castro of counsel), for respondent. OPINION OF THE COURT MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed

  9. Matter of 12 Cornelia Street, Inc.

    56 N.Y.2d 895 (N.Y. 1982)   Cited 87 times
    In Matter of 12 Cornelia St. (Ross) (56 N.Y.2d 895), the Court of Appeals set forth some of the characteristics which it considered illustrative of an independent contractor rather than an employee status.

  10. K2 Inv. Grp., LLC v. Am. Guarantee & Liab. Ins. Co.

    2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 1102 (N.Y. 2014)   Cited 28 times   6 Legal Analyses
    In K2 Investment Group, LLC v. American Guarantee & Liability Insurance Co., 22 N.Y.3d 578, 983 N.Y.S.2d 761, 6 N.E.3d 1117 (2014), the New York Court of Appeals held that an insurer's breach of its duty to defend does not bar it from relying on policy exclusions not at issue in the underlying action in order to resist a duty to indemnify.