84 Cited authorities

  1. Lamie v. U.S. Trustee

    540 U.S. 526 (2004)   Cited 1,812 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts should not add an "absent word" to a statute
  2. United States v. Wade

    388 U.S. 218 (1967)   Cited 7,439 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Sixth Amendment provides the right to counsel at a postindictment lineup even though the Fifth Amendment is not implicated
  3. Davis v. Alaska

    415 U.S. 308 (1974)   Cited 5,152 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that this confrontation right is applicable to state and federal defendants alike
  4. Simmons v. United States

    390 U.S. 377 (1968)   Cited 6,060 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Holding that defendant's testimony to establish standing for purposes of claiming a Fourth Amendment violation "should not be admissible against him at trial on the question of guilt or innocence"
  5. Dunaway v. New York

    442 U.S. 200 (1979)   Cited 3,343 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that probable cause was required where petitioner's detention, though not styled as an arrest, "was in important respects indistinguishable from a traditional arrest"
  6. Pennsylvania v. Ritchie

    480 U.S. 39 (1987)   Cited 2,352 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "criminal defendants have the right to the government's assistance in compelling the attendance of favorable witnesses at trial and the right to put before a jury evidence that might influence the determination of guilt"
  7. Delaware v. Fensterer

    474 U.S. 15 (1985)   Cited 1,720 times
    Holding that the confrontation clause guarantees only "an opportunity for effective cross-examination, not cross-examination that is effective in whatever way, and to whatever extent, the defense might wish."
  8. Ohio v. Johnson

    467 U.S. 493 (1984)   Cited 1,068 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the double jeopardy clause protects against "cumulative punishments for convictions on the same offense"
  9. Weyant v. Okst

    101 F.3d 845 (2d Cir. 1996)   Cited 2,244 times
    Holding that matter of officers' qualified immunity could not be resolved as a matter of law because determination whether it was reasonable for officers to believe their actions met established legal principles depended on disputed version of facts
  10. People v. Crimmins

    36 N.Y.2d 230 (N.Y. 1975)   Cited 5,176 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an error is prejudicial "if an appellate court concludes that there is a significant probability, rather than only a rational possibility, in the particular case that the jury would have acquitted the defendant had it not been for the error or errors which occurred"
  11. Rule 608 - A Witness's Character for Truthfulness or Untruthfulness

    Fed. R. Evid. 608   Cited 2,408 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Providing that "the court may, on cross-examination, allow [specific instances of the witness's conduct] to be inquired into if they are probative of the character for truthfulness or untruthfulness"