Notice Entry of OrderCal. Super. - 6th Dist.April 5, 202110 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 21 CV379147 Santa Clara - Civil Edwin Aiwazian (SBN 232943) Arby Aiwazian (SBN 269827) Ovsanna Takvoryan (SBN 2 1 7435) LAWYERS for JUSTICE, PC 410 West Arden Avenue, Suite 203 Glendale, California 91203 Tel: (818) 265-1020 / Fax: (818) 265-1021 Attorneysfor Plaintiff Deangelo Daniels Electronically Filed by Superior Court of CA, County of Santa Clara, on 11/10/2021 5:43 PM Reviewed By: R. Walker Case #21 CV379147 Envelope: 7646686 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DEANGELO DANIELS, individually, and 0n behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated; Plaintiff, vs. GARUDA LABS, INC. DBA INSTAWORK, an unknown business entity; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive; Defendants. Case No.2 21CV379147 CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF ORDER ASSIGNING COORDINATION MOTION JUDGE NOTICE OF ORDER ASSIGNING COORDINATION MOTION JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE of the Order Assigning Coordination Motion Judge issued by Chief Justice 0f California and Chair 0f the Judicial Council the Honorable Tani G. Cantil- Sakauye in the Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding given the special title 0f “Garuda Labs Wage and Hour Cases” and numbered JCCP 5 1 93, a copy 0fwhich is attached hereto as“m A.” Dated: November 10, 2021 LAWYERSfor JUSTICE, PC WW, 0/5mm. By: Ovsanna Takvoryan Attorneysfor Plaintiff-Petitioner 1 NOTICE OF ORDER ASSIGNING COORDINATION MOTION JUDGE EXHIBIT A CHAIR, JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA 455 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102-3688 Coordination Proceeding ) Special Title (Rule 3.550) ) ) ) GARUDA LABS WAGE AND HOUR ) JUDICIAL COUNCIL CASES ) COORDINATION PROCEEDING ) NO. 5193 ) ) ORDER ASSIGNING COORDINATION MOTION JUDGE THE PRESIDING JUDGE of the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda, is hereby authorized to assign this matter to a judge of the court pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 404 and rule 3.524 of the California Rules of Court to sit as coordination motion judge to determine whether the included actions listed below are complex (rule 3.502), and if so, whether coordination ofthose actions is appropriate. If the coordination motion judge grants the petition for coordination, the judge must (1) recommend a particular superior court for the site of the coordination proceedings, pursuant to rule 3.530, and (2) select the reviewing court having appellate jurisdiction if the actions to be coordinated are within the jurisdiction of more than one reviewing court, pursuant to rule 3.505(a). INCLUDED ACTIONS COURT NUMBER SHORT TITLE Superior Court of California RG20061241 Tran V. Garuda Labs, Inc. County ofAlameda Superior Court of California RG20067292 Tran v. Garuda Labs, Inc. County of Alameda COURT Superior Court of California County of San Francisco Superior Court of California County of San Francisco Superior Court of California County of Santa Clara Superior Court of California County of Santa Clara MM CGC-20-586542 CGC-21-589650 21CV379147 21CV383683 SHORT TITLE Basu-Kesselman v. Garuda Labs, Inc. Llamas v. Advantage Workforce Services, LLC, ct a1. Daniels v. Garuda Labs, Inc. Daniels v. Garuda Labs, Inc. Pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 404.5 and rule 3.5 15, pending the determination of whether coordination is appropriate, the coordination motion judge may stay any action being considered for, or affecting an action being considered for, coordination. Pursuant to rule 3.524, the clerk of each court in which an included action is pending is directed to file this order in the included action. Also, pursuant to rule 3.524, all documents required to be submitted to the coordination motion judge must be transmitted to the court address designated below: Presiding Judge of the Superior Court of California, County of Alameda 1225 Fallon Street Oakland, CA 94612-4278 Pursuant to rule 3.51 1, a copy of every notice of opposition, application for stay order, stay order, notice of hearing on the petition, and order granting or denying coordination must be transmitted to the Chair of the Judicial Council at the following address: Chair, Judicial Council of California Attn: Appellate Court Services (Civil Case Coordination) 455 Golden Gate Avenue, 5th Floor San Francisco, CA 94102-3688 2 Petitioner is directed to serve a copy of this order on (1) all parties to the included actions, and (2) the clerk of each court for filing in each included action. Dated: October 29, 2021 f a;um“WK Chief Justice of California and Chair of the Judicial Council CHAIR, JUDICIAL COUNCIL OF CALIFORNIA PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION NUMBER: CASE NUMBER: 51 93 1. l am over the age of 18 and not a party to this legal action. 2. I am employed in the City and County of San Francisco and my business address is 455 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102-3688 3. On November 1, 2021, I served a copy of the following documents: x ORDER ASSIGNING COORDINATION MOTION JUDGE ORDER ASSIGNING COORDINATION TRIAL JUDGE ORDER ASSIGNING COORDINATION MOTION JUDGE AND SETTING DATE FOR HEARING AMENDED ORDER ASSIGNING COORDINATION MOTION JUDGE AMENDED ORDER ASSIGNING COORDINATION TRIAL JUDGE OTHER on the interested parties listed on the attached mailing list by placing a true copy enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid in the outgoing mailbox in my office, in accordance with ordinary business practices for deposit with the United States Postal Service in San Francisco, California. | am readily familiar with my office's business practice for collection of and processing of correspondence for mailing, and under that practice the above document is being deposited with the United States Postal Service this date in San Francisco, California, in the ordinary course of business. 4. | declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Date: Monday, November 1, 2021 \ Bernadine M.[Adam MAILING LIST JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION PROCEEDING NO. 5193 Edwin Aiwazian Arby Aiwazian Ovsanna Takvoroyan LAWYERS FOR JUSTICE, PC 410 West Arden Avenue, Suite 203 Glendale, CA 91203 LAWYERS for JUSTICE, PC 410 West Arden Avenue, Suite 203 Glendale, California 91203 \DOONQUI-PWNt-k NNNNNNNNNt-th-tr-tt-th-tr-tt-th-tr-tt-t OONONUI$UJNHOKOOON©U14>UJNHO PROOF OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OFLOSANGELES I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State 0f California. I am over the age 0f 18 and not a party to the within action. My business address is 410 West Arden Avenue, Suite 203, Glendale, California 91203. On November 10, 2021, I served the foregoing document(s) described as: NOTICE OF ORDER ASSIGNING COORDINATION MOTION JUDGE 0n interested parties in this action as follows: Jonathan M. Lebe Zachary Gershman LEBE LAW, APLC 777 S. Alameda Street, Second Floor Los Angeles, CA 90021 Isam Khoury Michael D. Singer Kristina Alicia De La Rosa COHELAN KHOURY & SINGER 605 C Street, Suite 200 San Diego, CA 92101 Attorneysfor Plaintiff Tai Tran Shaun Setareh David Keledjian SETAREH LAW GROUP 9665 Wilshire B1Vd., Suite 430 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 Attorneysfor Plaintiff Daniel Llamas Norman B. Blumenthal Kyle R. Nordrehaug Aparajit Bhowmik Nicholas J. De Blouw BLUMENTHAL NORDREHAUG BHOWMIK DE BLOUW LLP 2255 Calle Clara La Jolla, CA 92037 Attorneysfor Plaintiff Ishan Basu-Kesselman /// /// /// PROOF OF SERVICE LAWYERSfor JUSTICE, PC 410 West Arden Avenue, Suite 203 Glendale, California 91203 \DOOQQUI-bWNr-t NNNNNNNNNt-tb-tr-tt-th-tr-xt-tr-xr-tt-t OONQUl-PUJNi-‘OKOOOQONU‘I-PUJNF-‘O Andrew M. Spurchise LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 900 3rd Avenue, 8th Floor New York, NY 10022-3298 Elisa Nadeau Linda Nguyen Bollinger LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 50 W. San Fernando, 7th Floor San Jose, CA 951 13 Attorneysfor Defendants Garuda Labs, Inc. DBA Instawork and Advantage Workforce Services, LLC [X] [X] BY GENERAL LOGISTICS SYSTEMS (GLS)/FEDEX EXPRESS I placed such documents in a General Logistics Systems (GLS)/FedEX Express Envelope addressed to the party 0r parties listed above with delivery fees fully pre-paid for overnight delivery by the close of the next business day and caused it to be delivered to a General Logistics Systems (GLS) drop-off box before 5:00 p.m./FedEX Express before 5:00 p.m. 0n the stated date. STATE I declare under penalty 0f perjury under the laws 0f the State 0f California that the above is true and correct. Executed 0n November 10, 2021, at Glendale, California. Valerie Palomo PROOF OF SERVICE