OrderCal. Super. - 6th Dist.April 2, 202110 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Envelope: 6902769 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA JASON AMYX, individually and 0n behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, V. BOARDWALK AUTO CENTER, INC.; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. Case No.: 2 1 CV379043 Assigned For A11 Purposes T0: Hon. Sunil R. Kulkarni Department 1 “[PROPQSEMORMR GRANTING REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL 0F INDIVIDUAL AND CLASS ACTION CLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE Complaint Filed: April 2, 2021 Trial Date: None set \ [PROfiQSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE FILED County of Santa Clara Superior Court of CA Clerk of The Court 21CV379043 By: rwalker July 23, 2021 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 FROPGSEM ORDER Having considered the Declaration 0f Kristy R. Connolly Pursuant t0 California Rules 0f Court, Rule 3.770, and In Support 0f Plaintiff” s Request for Dismissal 0f Action Without Prejudice (“Declaration”), the facts upon which the Declaration is based, and good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: (1) Pursuant t0 California Rule 0f Court 3.770(b), n0 hearing regarding Plaintiff’s request for dismissal is required; (2) Plaintiff shall file and serve the proposed First Amended Complaint, which dismisses his individual and class action claims Without prejudice (3) Pursuant t0 California Rule 0f Court 3.770(0), Plaintiff is not required t0 provide notice of dismissal to putative class members because the rights of putative class members are not prejudiced by this dismissal.WA Hon. Sunil R. Kulkarni Judge of the Superior Court IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 23, 2021 By: 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
