Motion QuashCal. Super. - 6th Dist.February 1, 2021\OOO\10\ 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Alexis J. DaCosta (pro se) dacosta.alexis@gmail.com 1292 Kifer Road. Suite 802 I L E Sunnyvale. California 94086 Telephone: 858-736-7618 APR 2 1 2021 Plaintit‘t‘ALEXIs DaCOSTA Slum, k figflfitfigfla cm BY DEPUTY K. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ALEXIS DaCOSTA. an individual. Case N0. 21CH009837 Plaintiff. v. NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION T0 QUASH DEPOSITION SUBPOENA FOR KRZYSZTOF SYWULA. an individual. CONSUMER RECORDS OF PLAINTIFF ALEXIS DaCOSTA Date: 5'2 5'1, Time: QA-M Crtrm: Judge: Hon. Defendant. ERIK S. JOHNSON TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR RESPECTIVE ATTORNEYS OF RECORD; TO T-MOBILE USA, INC.; AND TO CHRISTOPHER L. WALTERS: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that 0n 52'25’ 2021. at fl. 0° _A_.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard in Department fl of the above-entitled court, located at 191 North First Street. San Jose. California 95] 13. Plaintiff ALEXIS DaCOSTA. Will move the coun for an order QUASHING the Deposition Subpoenas (Subpoenas Duces Tecum) served by Defendant KRZYSZTOF SYWULA 0n March 30, 2021 0n third pany T-MOBILE USA, INC. for consumer records/employment records pertaining t0 ALEXIS DaCOSTA, Plaintiff in this action. NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOIiNA FOR CONSUMER RECORDS Case N0. 21CH009837 Ix) This motion is bascd upon C.C.P. § 1985.3. C.C.P. § 1985.6. C.C.P. § 1987.1 and is predicated upon the grounds that. without limitation: a. The deposition subpoena for Ihc production 0f business records and things is not reasonably calculated l0 lead to lhc discovery ofadmissiblc evidence: b. The deposition subpoena for thc production 0f business records and things seeks DaCosIa‘s personal identitying infomlation and violates his Califomia constitutional right ot‘privacy (Cal. Code Civ. Proc. Section l987.l(b)); c. The deposition subpoena for the production 0f business records and things is objectionable under Cal. Code (‘iv. Proc. Section 1985.3(g). to the extent it seeks non-party consumer records: d. The deposition subpoena for the production of business records and things is procedurally improper and ineffective: e. The deposition subpoena for Ihc production of business records and things has not been properly served: and f. The deposition subpoena for the production ofbusiness records and things violates the Stored Communications Act ( l8 U.S.C. section 2701. cl seq). PLEASE TAKE FUR'I‘I HER NOTICE that plaintiffldefendant will seek monetary sanctions against Defendant SYWULA and/or his attorney. Christopher Walters. in the sum 0f $2066.36. pursuant 10 C.C.P. § 1987.2 and (ICP. § 2023.010. This motion is further based upon this notice: the attached Memorandum 0f Points and Authorities: the Declaration 0f Alexis DaCostu. filed herewith: upon the records and files in this action; and upon such further evidence and argument as may be presented prior to 0r at the time of hearing 0n the motion. Dated: April l9. 2021 Respectfully Submitted By: ./.s'/ Alexis Du( ‘osla ALEXIS DACOSTA. Plaintiff l N(H'ICI' ()I- MUI |()N AND MOI ION |( ) ()UASII SITBPUENA FOR L‘ONSUMLR RECORDS Case No. 2|(‘H009837